Ignore It or Deal With It? Sharia Law In The Uk!!, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 25-10-2009 @ 04:47 PM by Udo Hohnekamp Lux.
As I already said in another thread here, this march should be subjected to
authorization (probably will be) for checking on the constitutionality of the
aim propagated.
I would doubt it very much that the UK´s supreme court would rule in favor
of permitting the march, given the fact that the elements within the Sharia
are unconstitutional.
I am assuming that, like many other European countries, the UK has a strict
separation of the Church from the State.
Now this matter is a religious one, which makes this affair ridiculous and
nonsensical at the same time. You cannot seize your constitutional
authorities with something non-constitutional like religion, the freedom of
which is guaranteed anyway.
On the other hand you have to take their intentions seriously and put a stop
to their calling for criminal acts via Sharia.
In my country of residence (Luxembourg) Islam does not even have the
status of a religion. They have in vain applied for it as yet.
The UK should have awarded this status only after a thorough research
on Islam and Sharia, if at all.
If anybody wants to change the constitution, he would need the maximum
of all possible majorities in Parliament.
They will not patiently wait for the day, when they will have outbred the
indigenous people by that required majority.
You could call Gert Wilders from the Netherlands for help.
Unlike any other citizens, Muslims are first followers of Allah and second
only nationals of the country of residence.
I am still waiting for someone to tell me what all this indiscriminate
bombing by (unbelieving) Islamic fundamentalists all over the world is to achieve.
You Brits have an expert on the matter in your country :

Nobel-prize-winning Naipaul, whose book "Among the Believers : An
Islamic Journey" would set your mind right on the matter.


reply posted on 25-10-2009 @ 04:51 PM by phoenix103
Originally posted by Udo Hohnekamp Lux.
As I already said in another thread here, this march should be subjected to
authorization (probably will be) for checking on the constitutionality of the
aim propagated.
I would doubt it very much that the UK´s supreme court would rule in favor
of permitting the march, given the fact that the elements within the Sharia
are unconstitutional.
I am assuming that, like many other European countries, the UK has a strict
separation of the Church from the State.
Now this matter is a religious one, which makes this affair ridiculous and
nonsensical at the same time. You cannot seize your constitutional
authorities with something non-constitutional like religion, the freedom of
which is guaranteed anyway.
On the other hand you have to take their intentions seriously and put a stop
to their calling for criminal acts via Sharia.
In my country of residence (Luxembourg) Islam does not even have the
status of a religion. They have in vain applied for it as yet.
The UK should have awarded this status only after a thorough research
on Islam and Sharia, if at all.
If anybody wants to change the constitution, he would need the maximum
of all possible majorities in Parliament.
They will not patiently wait for the day, when they will have outbred the
indigenous people by that required majority.
You could call Gert Wilders from the Netherlands for help.
Unlike any other citizens, Muslims are first followers of Allah and second
only nationals of the country of residence.
I am still waiting for someone to tell me what all this indiscriminate
bombing by (unbelieving) Islamic fundamentalists all over the world is to achieve.
You Brits have an expert on the matter in your country :

Nobel-prize-winning Naipaul, whose book "Among the Believers : An
Islamic Journey" would set your mind right on the matter.


The aim is irrelevant, providing it will be peaceful, people have a right to protest. Are you really suggesting people should only be allowed to protest if the state approves of the aims?

Never heard anything so ludicrous in all my life.


reply posted on 25-10-2009 @ 04:57 PM by TruthxIsxInxThexMist
reply to post by Britguy



I totally agree with what you are saying and in this case it's the New Labour Party who are to be held responsible....



reply posted on 25-10-2009 @ 06:07 PM by thoughtsfull
reply to post by purplemer



Even if their intention was to simply was to enforce Sharia on Muslims only (which it is not, it is to enforce Sharia on everyone on these Isles) Are you really suggesting we stand by while some young girl is stoned to death for falling in love someone she shouldn't or be seen holding hands with someone without a male relative present? should we allow someone to be beheaded for leaving the Muslim faith? So because I wouldn't want that to happen to anyone on these Islands that makes me a racist?


reply posted on 25-10-2009 @ 06:22 PM by purplemer
Originally posted by thoughtsfull
reply to
post by purplemer



Even if their intention was to simply was to enforce Sharia on Muslims only (which it is not, it is to enforce Sharia on everyone on these Isles) Are you really suggesting we stand by while some young girl is stoned to death for falling in love someone she shouldn't or be seen holding hands with someone without a male relative present? should we allow someone to be beheaded for leaving the Muslim faith? So because I wouldn't want that to happen to anyone on these Islands that makes me a racist?



yes it makes you a racist assuming that all muslims want to stone girls to death 4 falling in love with someone

kx


reply posted on 25-10-2009 @ 06:37 PM by jimmyx
Originally posted by Dermo
reply to
post by TruthxIsxInxThexMist



I never understood the mindset regarding the whole "Sharia Law for the UK" thing until a few weeks ago when I called out a friend of my sister about it - he is a pro Sharia English Muslim. My question was, why are you after moving to such a powerful old country and trying to change their system of governance to suit yourselves, why cant you just live and let live.

He answered: When cant they stop trying to spread the western system in our Muslim countries through force, ill stop my peaceful efforts of trying to spread my system in theirs.

Its fair enough IMO. There's nothing else I could really say to him tbh.



tell him because sharia law is a 1500 year old barbaric way to treat your fellow human. because a law that allows a man to kill a women because the woman is his property is not allowed...period. his corrollary is intellectually dishonest in the comparison. islamic fundementalists have used force in many countries where they try and change the government over to islamic rule...he sounds like an arrogant pr#ck. and if he feels that way, you better keep an eye on him...one day he might not like what your sister says to him, and he might use a little sharia law on her.


reply posted on 25-10-2009 @ 07:05 PM by thoughtsfull
Originally posted by purplemer
Originally posted by thoughtsfull
reply to
post by purplemer




yes it makes you a racist assuming that all muslims want to stone girls to death 4 falling in love with someone

kx


reply to post by purplemer



Where did I say assume that all of Muslims? why are you putting words down that I've not written..

This thread is about this particular march, this particular march is run by Islam4UK..

Islam4UK want to impose full sharia laws in the UK on all inhabitants, including forcing all women in the UK behind the veil and the examples I gave.

This march has been roundly condemned by most if not almost all Muslims groups in the UK..

The demonstration, involving a march from Parliament to Trafalgar Square on 31 October, is organised by the fringe group Islam4UK, who support “the full implementation of sharia law in the UK” and say that they "have had enough of freedom".

However, the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), an umbrella body for Muslim organisations, said that they deplored the march and expressed their firm support for “the value of free speech in Britain”.

Meanwhile, a spokesperson for the Islamic Society of Britain told the Daily Telegraph that “99.999 per cent of Muslims despise these people. This only serves to fuel racial tensions.”

The Muslim Public Affairs Committee (MPAC) accused the march's leader Anjem Choudary of giving “anti-Muslim groups the propaganda coup to demonise Muslims”.


So for agreeing with those Muslims against this march including the MCB you are branding me a racist?

Please could you explain why you are doing that!



[edit on 25/10/09 by thoughtsfull]



reply posted on 25-10-2009 @ 07:46 PM by deathpoet69
Originally posted by thoughtsfull
reply to
post by purplemer



Even if their intention was to simply was to enforce Sharia on Muslims only (which it is not, it is to enforce Sharia on everyone on these Isles) Are you really suggesting we stand by while some young girl is stoned to death for falling in love someone she shouldn't or be seen holding hands with someone without a male relative present? should we allow someone to be beheaded for leaving the Muslim faith? So because I wouldn't want that to happen to anyone on these Islands that makes me a racist?




absoulte bravo to that! i dint know about the holding hands in front of a male relative?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
  Posted 17 days ago with 21 member flags
Study says racists and conservatives are dumb
  Posted 7 days ago with 16 member flags
Is ‘anti-Canadianism’ the new ‘anti-Americanism?’
  Posted 16 days ago with 8 member flags
Clarification on the definition of "natural born citizen"
  Posted 14 days ago with 7 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 16 hours ago, 188 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 11 hours ago, 105 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 7 hours ago, 75 replies