It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ArMaP
If we do not accept people that deny the possibility of extraterrestrial life, how do you expect to make them learn that they are approaching it in the wrong way?....
That's why I think that we should not limit any forum to a specific type of person and why I think that even some apparently off-topic posts may be left on a thread, sometimes the best way of solving a problem is by diverting out thought to a different thing for some time.
It was just a bear pit.
That's why we have the "Alert" button at the bottom of each post, for when people start to cross the barrier of what is admissible in a civilised discussion.
Originally posted by Malcram
I think having too many members posting with this unrestrained attitude of snarky, sneering, hostile denial of the very possibility of ET life and visitation seriously handicaps this forum and stalls discussion.
Anyone can learn, you just have to speak (write) to them in the right way to make them reach a point where they start doubting their own ideas, that's when the need for more knowledge appears in them.
And the latter are not learning anything, IMO, except that any discussion can be derailed with a few well chosen insults and that doing so endless fun LOL.
Originally posted by ArMaPThat's why we have the "Alert" button at the bottom of each post, for when people start to cross the barrier of what is admissible in a civilised discussion.
Anyone can learn, you just have to speak (write) to them in the right way to make them reach a point where they start doubting their own ideas, that's when the need for more knowledge appears in them. And I guarantee that it works, I have done it some times, about UFOs and other subjects. PS: but you have to be patient, people do not like to be rushed out of their comfort zone.
Originally posted by ziggystar60
But that does not mean that I will take any grainy photo, blurred YouTube video or tall tale as a proof of UFOs and aliens visiting us. I still have the right to question any material presented, and I also have every right to say so if I think there is a very mundane explanation for a strange light in the sky. Does that make me a skeptic?
That would be off-topic, so the staff should be alerted to them.
Originally posted by Malcram
For instance, if there was a member who in every thread simply replied: "You people need to wake up and give yourself to Jesus. He is the Lord and your interest in Aliens is just flirting with demonism.", then I doubt you'd be impressed. Their posts aren't abusive, but they have no real place here.
They may contribute, their posts may become noticeable as a disruption even to people that started out by agreeing with them, but their actions will show how they really are and the "extremists" may loose some of their "audience" because of that.
Similarly, if all a member contributes is closed minded denial of the very possibility of ET life and it's connection with UFO's then they aren't contributing anything either.
If things turn into a distraction from the real discussion, once more, the staff should be alerted, those actions are just like radiation, they accumulate, and when they reach their critic mass they may even enough for a post ban.
If such pointless posts are accompanied by snarky sarcasm and constant jibes (even if not quite 'alert' worthy) and there are enough members constantly posting them, then other members are required to have the patience of saints to put up with this and to try to continue a discussion despite it. And why should they have to put up with this?
Why didn't they phoned to Anne, it looks like the right way of communicating in this case.
I admire your desire for tolerance of such members who relish being disruptive and rude but I can't help but think of Dr Lawrence's endless tolerance for the antics of Anne, no matter how troublesome to those around her.
Yes, but don't expect to be treated in a different way just because your opinion is the same as the majority or not, all people should have the same rights, only when they start abusing them should they have some restrictions, a discussion forum (or anything else) that likes to see itself as being on the "right side" should never be based in restrictions of the membership.
Originally posted by Jazzyguy
Hence if you go to ATS, you might not believe the norm but don't attack the actual norm and ridicule it.
Originally posted by ArMaP
Why didn't they phoned to Anne, it looks like the right way of communicating in this case.
I think so.
Originally posted by Malcram
It seems like you are saying that all the solutions to this problem are already in place.
Yes, that's true, but what was proposed was the separation before they become disruptive, based on their opinions, and that, to me, it's not the right way of doing things.
Originally posted by Edward 1st
Think of it like a school classroom full of both disruptive children and children who want to learn. That class is always going to be held back by the disruptive children. If you separate that class then those children who want to learn will excel.
Originally posted by ArMaP
Yes, that's true, but what was proposed was the separation before they become disruptive, based on their opinions, and that, to me, it's not the right way of doing things.
Originally posted by Edward 1st
Think of it like a school classroom full of both disruptive children and children who want to learn. That class is always going to be held back by the disruptive children. If you separate that class then those children who want to learn will excel.
That would be punishing people for their opinions and not for their actions.
And that, for me, is punishment, seeing that we would be limiting their free movements on ATS.
Originally posted by Edward 1st
It's not about punishing people it's about separating people according to beliefs.
But in this case it would be like not allowing Muslims or the Christians on a neutral place, like a cinema, just because the Christians or Muslims didn't want them there.
Just like Muslims don’t go to church and Christians don’t go to mosques.
That is why I said that we (and in that "we" I mean we, ATS members) should "police" ourselves; if there is someone disrupting a discussion just send an alert.
This is a problem on many forums I visit. You’ve got to wonder what the people in charge want if they just continue to just to sit and watch their disruptive classroom. Their vote is obviously for no progress.
Originally posted by ArMaP
Yes, but don't expect to be treated in a different way just because your opinion is the same as the majority or not, all people should have the same rights, only when they start abusing them should they have some restrictions, a discussion forum (or anything else) that likes to see itself as being on the "right side" should never be based in restrictions of the membership.
Originally posted by ArMaP
Yes, that's true, but what was proposed was the separation before they become disruptive, based on their opinions, and that, to me, it's not the right way of doing things.
That would be punishing people for their opinions and not for their actions.