Grey aliens are taking some humans to Pleiades

It seems like Grey Aliens are taking some humans to Pleiades. The proof is Chapter 12 in this book:
www.courtneybrown.com...



[edit on 22-10-2009 by sphinx551]

Well if it is in a book then it must be true. Furthermore it is on the web which makes it double true. Well I hope they treat folks nice on Pleadise or wherever it is.

There is no "proof" of "grey aliens" taking humans anywhere. Proof is irrefutable evidence. There is none in the book. "Scientific Remote Viewing" is not real science and its supporters do not require evidence, just a good tale which the author, a political "scientist"(!) provides. What the author in the book claims cannot be substantiated, therefore it's all in his mind!. The book is 13 years old!

And when you have Whitley Strieber and John Mack endorsing it, that is its death knell.

Yeah... just like the bible. No way that's just a group of stories made up by some people who polly had nothing better to do. That stuff is all true. Yup, it's all true I tell ya. True.

Aliens aren't taking people anywhere. Why would they? If they view us, like we view "animals in a zoo", do we feel the need to snatch a monkey in the middle of the night while it's sleeping, drive it to Chicopee Massachusetts, and then return it to the zoo just to do it? NO. Then why would they?

Edit for spacing.

[edit on 22-10-2009 by BrnBdry]

I briefly skimmed through the book, looks interesting, I will have to read a few pages tonight.
I have not heard much about the author, do have any other info?
Thanks.

reply to post by sphinx551

---

Here's a snippet from a very interesting article written by Scott O. Lilienfeld, a colleague of Brown's at Emory University:




www.emory.edu...

do you have any pictures you can show us of these aliens taking humans? that would be conisidered proof I think.

reply to post by BrnBdry

---

Maybe not..

But don't we capture monkeys in the wild then take them to said zoo??

While I agree that the OP's source is ridiculous, I don't believe they view us like "animals in a zoo." We are intelligent, capable of forming complex thoughts and performing complex tasks. We are probably closer in intelligence to them than chimps are to us.

Yes, but that doesn't mean aliens are doing it.

Hey peeps, I just got back WHEW!! What a trip! Pleiades is amazing! Will post pics soon, gotta unpack first.

I'm gonna be honest with you; I read this book like I read any other science-fiction book or story. To me, this is entertainment. Nothing more.

I wasn't saying they are..
Just pointing out the logic..

I think they do. Aliens are probably laughing at how "uncivilized, ignorant and creeps" humans are compared to them.

Thanks for the link....it looks like a very interesting read. I'll let you know what I think.

Cheers

To be fair, why would they view us as "animals in a zoo"? Wouldn't they view us as "animals in the wild"? And yes, we do snatch animals out of the wild and then return them...all the time.

Does your "bum" hurt? Can you sit down? Is diarrhea easier to deal with?

Preservation

Well a few hundred years ago Captain James Cook, took with consent, a native (I believe from Vanuatu) back to London. Cook kept his word and returned him to his homeland a few years later. This wasn't for research, slavery, anything like that - it was purely because both parties agreed and it would be cool to do so.

reply to post by BrnBdry

---

Funny how quickly and apparently unknowingly people can become so hypocritical on here. Where is YOUR proof that aliens are not taking people anywhere? Keep in mind absence of evidence is NOT proof of anything either way.

Your argument has as much evidence as the other does at this time. Just because there is no "absolute proof" of aliens abducting people does not make it not true. Alternatively, just because someone is claiming in a book that aliens are taking people to another star system does not mean that is true either.

There is simply not enough information either way to make such a confident judgement as you did.

---

reply to post by sphinx551

Well thanks for sharing, but unless you were giving us a advertising-like description of the book you shouldn't state that "the proof is in the book on chapter 12", that is erroneous and can be misleading.

Additionally, it is usually better if you might give us some of your OWN insights into what you think about this "proof", because honestly myself or many others are not going to sit down and waste our time reading this lengthy book just because it is yet another out of 1 MILLION plus that claim to "have the truth" in there.

While I do not doubt that based on the available evidence it is possible that alien abductions do exist, I feel that such claims as these that lack any type of even semi-solid evidence to back them up should remain considered in the HIGHLY SPECULATIVE parts of ufology, this type of thing is NOT what is needed right now in regards to getting more respectable mainstream attention.

While it might be prudent for any ufologist to have a read through this book and others, it should always be regarded as exactly what it is-super speculative with MUCH more evidence needed before such things can even be taken to another level besides conjecture in my humble opinion.

Thanks for sharing however.

[edit on 10/23/2009 by jkrog08]