It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Fromabove
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
I could care less what congress attempts to do, I am saying the internet is not theirs to play with it belongs to us and market forces, not them. Every time government involves themselves in the lives and property and freedom of people they screw it up, every single time.
Originally posted by jimmyx
Every time government involves themselves in the lives and property and freedom of people they screw it up, every single time.
COMMISSION SEEKS PUBLIC INPUT ON DRAFT RULES TO PRESERVE THE FREE AND OPEN INTERNET
[...]
Under the draft proposed rules, subject to reasonable network management, a provider of broadband Internet access service:
1. would not be allowed to prevent any of its users from sending or receiving the lawful content of the user’s choice over the Internet;
2. would not be allowed to prevent any of its users from running the lawful applications or using the lawful services of the user’s choice;
3. would not be allowed to prevent any of its users from connecting to and using on its network the user’s choice of lawful devices that do not harm the network;
4. would not be allowed to deprive any of its users of the user’s entitlement to competition among network providers, application providers, service providers, and content providers;
5. would be required to treat lawful content, applications, and services in a nondiscriminatory manner; and
6. would be required to disclose such information concerning network management and other practices as is reasonably required for users and content, application, and service providers to enjoy the protections specified in this rulemaking.
Originally posted by desertdreamer
I put up a post about net neutrality a while back, and no one seemed very interested.
Originally posted by Fromabove
I could care less what congress attempts to do,
Originally posted by jimmyx
Originally posted by Fromabove
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
I could care less what congress attempts to do, I am saying the internet is not theirs to play with it belongs to us and market forces, not them. Every time government involves themselves in the lives and property and freedom of people they screw it up, every single time.
c'mon...every single time? really? tell me about all the freedoms you've lost.
In a way the Internet has become the world's collective concsious and is doing through a science that we can all agree is real what spiritually and metaphysically many people feel is impossible.
Plus I thought the buy off he took to run the worst campaign ever from the Rothschilds through IG Beverage to his wife was really just TOO Obvious.
I think it's misleading to as the best form of control ultimately is a free internet that everyone voluntarily attaches them selves grid like too.
source
Network neutrality (also net neutrality, Internet neutrality) is a principle proposed for residential broadband networks and potentially for all networks. A neutral broadband network is one that is free of restrictions on content, sites, or platforms, on the kinds of equipment that may be attached, and on the modes of communication allowed, as well as one where communication is not unreasonably degraded by other communication streams.[1][2][3]
The principle states that if a given user pays for a certain level of internet access, and another user pays for a given level of access, that the two users should be able to connect to each other at that given rate of access.
Because at the time, it had not yet been politicized by blatant lies from the conservative madmen hell-bent on resisting anything and everything that appears to come from this administration -- even though the Network Neutrality proposals began as far back as 2005.
Originally posted by Fromabove
Freedom is in jeopardy. But if they can block free speech they can then do as they please. They don't call them czars for nothing. And yes, every single time.
Originally posted by Fromabove
Freedom is in jeopardy.
Originally posted by vkey08
There was a lot of talk about the term Lawful Content that was being brought up on other places that I belong to (not normally politically related) that this could be twisted in the end to also allow the government to deem what is lawful...
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Originally posted by vkey08
There was a lot of talk about the term Lawful Content that was being brought up on other places that I belong to (not normally politically related) that this could be twisted in the end to also allow the government to deem what is lawful...
If you spend the time to actually read the FCC information on the matter, "lawful" refers to copyright-infringing content... not the nature of the content. The anti-administration spin-machine is what is twisting the reality beyond the actual truth of the matter.
Originally posted by Fromabove
Originally posted by jimmyx
Originally posted by Fromabove
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
I could care less what congress attempts to do, I am saying the internet is not theirs to play with it belongs to us and market forces, not them. Every time government involves themselves in the lives and property and freedom of people they screw it up, every single time.
c'mon...every single time? really? tell me about all the freedoms you've lost.
Freedom is in jeopardy. But if they can block free speech they can then do as they please. They don't call them czars for nothing. And yes, every single time.
[edit on 24-10-2009 by Fromabove]
Originally posted by whatukno
I can't believe John (Pro Gang Rape) McCain is for this bill.
((snip))