It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
acknowledge that there is an indiginous British people who have rights.
Originally posted by stumason
Ironically, the main parties attack on the BNP use of WW2 iconography and Winston Churchill is unfounded. Winston Churchill would probably have supported the BNP over the other parties and would certainly have not supported the push for EU federalisation, so Griffin is correct on that point.
Any romanticising over WW2 being fought for "freedom" doesn't change the fact that Churchill would be sat firmly in the right-wing if he was alive today.
Originally posted by suziwong
These are just a very few of the hundreds of headlines that we are faced with.......If we complain then we are dubbed racist or un-pc
UNNAMED MET officials who have now banned armed cops at Heathrow Airport from wearing the tiny union jack flag badge on their clothing
Hospital banned from serving hot cross buns at easter (a long standing tradition for the British –whether they are Christians or not) – in case it offends non-christians….MADNESS – unfair to British Christians and those who are non-religious who enjoy this long standing British tradition
Attempts to stop the Red arrows from performing at the 2012 olympic games – because they were considered “too British”
Historical British pub to change its name in case it offends Muslims
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
I think this has all been set up to make it seem that the light shines out of the other political party's asses. First 17 mins is just attacking BNP. Not really discussing politics as a whole, just attacking BNP.
Great move. Really makes me want to vote for those other parties. Childish.
He also claimed the audience was not representative of the UK as a whole as levels of immigration in London meant it was "no longer a British city".