Originally posted by Skyfloating
Part 3 of a 3 Part Series. Read Parts 1 and 2 before reading this.
I hope you have enjoyed this three part series on Ancient Extraterrestrials from a China-centric perspective.
I enjoyed writing it and publishing it for free in the Internet. My motive in doing so is the hope that it will inspire others to invest research time
into similar mysteries...
Skyfloating, I just want let you know that I finished reading the three part series, and must say that as you enjoyed writing it all I absolutely
enjoyed reading them all.
What a marvelous piece of information that is, I sorely realize how much work you must have done to put it all together.
Then your own thoughts about the meaning of those pieces of text are in my opinion really well thought out and very solid. There is little room for
something else so to speak.
As you said here.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Ancient accounts around the world speak – almost without exception – of “Sky People” and “Sky Gods” descending to planet earth, flying
through the skies, coming from and returning to the stars.
It is from such worldwide concordance that the “Ancient Astronaut Theory” arose.
The theory is still rejected by large parts of global society because it puts most of our belief-systems to question.
And here.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
The list of Serpents from every culture and country goes into the thousands, yet conventional “wisdom” maintains that they are unrelated and
fictitious. Carl Sagan for example, one of the most popular advocates of natural sciences in the 20th Century had this to say in his book “Dragons
of Eden” (1977):
“The Myth of Dragons arose from the innate fear of reptiles that we share with other mammals”
This sentence displays a certain amount of arrogance in that it wipes thousands and thousands of pages of ancient tradition away as meaningless.
People like Carl Sagan and those that belong to as you call it to the large parts of global society, the global scientific community if I am correct,
are mostly if not all intelligent people, therefore I don’t understand in any way such statements as they’re so far unbending point of view about
it.
It looks very strong like some sort of Forbidden Mythology, just as we already have Forbidden Archeology, Forbidden Egyptology and don't forget
Forbidden Ufology as well.
There must be some major reason for that all.
Here is for instance Forbidden archeology at work.
Here is for instance Forbidden Ufology at work.
Master Sgt. Dan Morris: US Air Force, NRO Operative
"I became part of a group that would investigate, gather the information, and in the beginning it was still under the Blue Book, Snowbird and
different covert programs.
I would go interview people who claimed they had seen something and try to convince them they hadn’t seen something or that they were hallucinating.
Well, if that didn’t work, another team would come in and give all the threats. And threaten them and their family and so on and so forth.
And they would be in charge of discrediting them, making them look foolish and so on and so forth.
Now if that didn’t work, then there was another team that put an end to that problem, one way or another."
From the DISCLOSURE PROJECT BRIEFING DOCUMENT of Dr. Steven Greer.
So obvious, in Ufology when people came out with sensitive information or a dissent opinion about it they where and are still today victim of
ridicule, victim of losing their jobs and even worse.
I wonder, could it be that that also counts for Mythology?
Just some thoughts.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
But why do ancient cultures universally use reptilian creatures to describe what they saw? Is it because the flying craft were built to look
reptilian? Is it because the pilots were of a reptilian race?
I think that that is the only logical explanation for it all and what is back upped by provided information due which I believe are very credible
people.
Well Skyfloating, I must stop now because this reply costed me already some hours to write now, and I hope I doesn’t made to many writing errors and
such.
[edit on 3/11/09 by spacevisitor]
[edit on 3/11/09 by spacevisitor]
[edit on 3/11/09 by spacevisitor]
[edit on 3/11/09 by spacevisitor]
]
read. 
)
