It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sirnex
reply to post by Conclusion
First off who said it is not being taught? People are learning about it everyday.
Sure, they are learning that there *might* be a spiritual solution, but what is not being is a viable mechanism for spirituality.
The viable mechanism for spirituality is the spirit. In order to learn about something first you have to take part in studying it. Meditation, prayer, ect...these are the books with which to learn from to understand spirituality.
You could say the same thing about quantum physics just because someone doesn't get it.
The difference here being that QM has testable theories in which some have been proven valid whereas spiritualism's testable theories have not been adequately proven nor observable. With the spiritualist solution we see way to many descriptions on what it is and how it works with none in agreement, it follows nothing like science.
The testable theories that are proven valid, are valid only to the one that understands them. There are a lot of scientist who believe in God that understand them. Since they believe in God they are not taken seriously. Think about it. Who would know the truth. One who studies both and knows both, or the one's that just study one side of the equation, disputing the other without ever studying and learning about it.
For the people learning about it, they do not show the work, the work is shown to them.
I would assume that is a 'personal experience' statement. That being the case, exclaiming personal experience that a faith is valid because your chosen God has told you so is immediately invalidated when taking in account the various other hundred faiths who have hundreds of thousands to millions of followers who also claim personal experience for their faith which goes against what your faith teaches.
If we look for a logical solution to everything, then wouldn't you surmise that the logical solution would be agreed upon as true by all of humanity, in the same light that we all agree gravity exists?
One way to look at it is, with all of the personal spiritual experiences in the world, as you said happening to millions of people should be enough proof. As far as other religions being invalidated, that is a matter you have to decide for yourself. Nothing anyone can state with truth goes against what he truly believes.
Yes I agree that a logical solution should be agreed upon as true by all humanity. But we do not need to know how gravity works to know its real.
Logical thought is what the ancients used to come up with spirituality, because they didn't know science to know how it worked.
At this stage of the argument we have to learn to be truly honest to ourselves. Spirituality would include any specific deities, concepts of a soul or supernatural creation of the universe or causation of natural occurrences.
I agree to a point. Anything that happens in this universe can, and will someday, be understood with the help of science. What you call supernatural creation would have to follow the Laws of this universe. Now getting to the Honesty to ourselves. You know as well as I do that science cannot figure out the Unified Field Theory as of today. So there in we do not know all the Laws of the universe. I believe there to be many more. As pertaining to specific deities I believe there can only be one from which everything else came. Even Evolution would support that.
Let's start with the creation of the universe, none agree on how it happened or how many God(s) were required in order to create it. What about the soul? Well, each culture and religion has their own views on what a soul is how it forms and where it goes upon death. Man has used primitive logic to even prove the existence of rain God(s), if we dance or pray for rain and we receive rain, then logic dictates that there should be a rain God answering that request for rain. Yet, that is faulty logic and not true logic.
Your statement is very true, and as you have pointed out logic does not always dictate truth. Science even shows us this. You see with spirituality, as with science, we have to take what we know as true for ourselves and go from there. As far as the many religions, well once again just as there are different theories on evolution the same holds true for spirituality. You have to study and pick which one rings true to your soul. As for faulty logic as both of us have learned in this debate, it is easy to refute faulty logic.
They just knew it worked. You know common sense.
Claiming something exists because you alone personally experienced it and convinced a mass of people to accept it is not inherently common sense or proof of something. Not saying you personally, but more to the point of people who came up with these various beliefs initially. Look at Scientology, a new religion concocted by a science fiction author and yet most if not all of it's followers proclaim personal experience that it's teachings are true. Or ... common sense.
That is true. Now I do not know much about Scientology so I cannot debate that. As we have shown above logic has its faults or faulty logic. That is one reason it is hard to use logic with spirituality and it usually happens on a personal level. But there have been mass visualizations of the spiritual nature. So that is evidence that not all spiritual experiences are personal ones, but I am sure they were also felt on a personal level.
Do you really believe that? If your answer was yes, then I would believe that you believe it. I would disagree and ask you to debate it. If you can debate it and make me believe then to me I would have gained wisdom.
If it stands to reason that my solution is debatable, then shouldn't any other belief devoid of physical proof be equally debatable and questioned?
The viable mechanism for spirituality is the spirit. In order to learn about something first you have to take part in studying it. Meditation, prayer, ect...these are the books with which to learn from to understand spirituality.
The testable theories that are proven valid, are valid only to the one that understands them. There are a lot of scientist who believe in God that understand them. Since they believe in God they are not taken seriously. Think about it. Who would know the truth. One who studies both and knows both, or the one's that just study one side of the equation, disputing the other without ever studying and learning about it.
One way to look at it is, with all of the personal spiritual experiences in the world, as you said happening to millions of people should be enough proof. As far as other religions being invalidated, that is a matter you have to decide for yourself. Nothing anyone can state with truth goes against what he truly believes.
Yes I agree that a logical solution should be agreed upon as true by all humanity. But we do not need to know how gravity works to know its real.
I agree to a point. Anything that happens in this universe can, and will someday, be understood with the help of science. What you call supernatural creation would have to follow the Laws of this universe. Now getting to the Honesty to ourselves. You know as well as I do that science cannot figure out the Unified Field Theory as of today. So there in we do not know all the Laws of the universe. I believe there to be many more. As pertaining to specific deities I believe there can only be one from which everything else came. Even Evolution would support that.
I apologize for not being clear about how evolution would agree with it. I assumed you would understand. Evolution believes that life started out from a singularity in the primal ooze. That is what I meant. Everything came from one thing.
While I understand all of your points and they are very good points, I fear you do not understand mine. The only way you can understand is experience it for yourself. If that happens you will be reflecting on your innermost thoughts. And with the knowledge that you have with science, and I admit dwarfs my knowledge of it, you may be the one to bring the two together. Spirituality is just like living, you have to experience it before you can come anywhere near explaining it.
Your statement is very true, and as you have pointed out logic does not always dictate truth. Science even shows us this. You see with spirituality, as with science, we have to take what we know as true for ourselves and go from there. As far as the many religions, well once again just as there are different theories on evolution the same holds true for spirituality. You have to study and pick which one rings true to your soul. As for faulty logic as both of us have learned in this debate, it is easy to refute faulty logic.
That is true. Now I do not know much about Scientology so I cannot debate that. As we have shown above logic has its faults or faulty logic. That is one reason it is hard to use logic with spirituality and it usually happens on a personal level. But there have been mass visualizations of the spiritual nature. So that is evidence that not all spiritual experiences are personal ones, but I am sure they were also felt on a personal level.
Yes. Through reasoning with each other common ground becomes the wisdom both seeks.
.....
Most fear comes from not understanding
Originally posted by Conclusion
reply to post by Xtraeme
Hmm. Well thought out. But since I am almost quiet positive that very few percentage of the world are educated enough to understand the 3rd law of thermodynamics, based on that alone cannot be man's greatest fear. But that was a nice approach. If your educated enough to know about the law then I know your brain is working. Very nice.
Originally posted by Sarunas Pranevicius
The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.
Originally posted by blupblup
"Man's greatest fear"
Loneliness.
Originally posted by Xtraeme
Originally posted by Conclusion
reply to post by Xtraeme
Hmm. Well thought out. But since I am almost quiet positive that very few percentage of the world are educated enough to understand the 3rd law of thermodynamics, based on that alone cannot be man's greatest fear. But that was a nice approach. If your educated enough to know about the law then I know your brain is working. Very nice.
If you re-read my previous comment you'll see that I said "creations greatest fear" not mans. Mans greatest fear, as I mentioned in the last post, changes over time with his environment and these fears center on absolutes as represented by:
- choice (having no capability to affect the world around us / choice without consequence)
- concepts of self / group
- a borg-like society developing
- the possibility that nothing exists outside of yourself - you're it - alone for all of time & space
- the notion of "every man for himself" where group cooperation completely breaks down & we all kill each other
- or a world where we realize we have no true identity we're just the sum of the parts of information that our brains have absorbed (metaphysical nihilism)
- and nature (that nature will eventually destroy all things through entropy; or that if nature can be overcome man will eventually have nothing left to see or do).
For the people here saying that they most fear never being loved. Consider that this is simply a concept of someone else never choosing you. (IE/ a combination of choice and self not being picked by another from the group.)
Another conceptual axis is the idea of "consequence," which can be broken up in to two parts (positive and negative experience).
Which is to say the expectation is that being chosen by someone else from the group reflects a positive result. It's also the one thing no person can buy, demand, or expect to have provided to them naturally as just a product of being alive. So it's perhaps one of the most tenuous and valuable in the sense that nothing the person can do affects the outcome if the other person chooses otherwise.
Originally posted by Confused and Dazed!
Erectile Dysfunction and a Hotty wife!
What would you say is man's greatest fear?