It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lillydale
I know this has been addressed from both sides but nothing definitive that I have seen so far. I am really confused by one thing. Does the FDR show that the door was never opened or just during that flight? I am a little concerned as to how the pilots, no matter who they were, got into the cockpit to begin with. I am sure this is a stupid question but I have seen too many answers to know which is supposed to be the real one. I mean the FDR has one set of data right? So is it supposed to be showing it was NEVER opened or just not on the flight?
Originally posted by Michal
Originally posted by iSunTzu... The FDR shows 2.2 maximum G force and if you calculate the G force required using reality and physics you get about 1.7 Gs needed. And the last few seconds average out to 1.6 to 1.7 G. Real science beats Balsamo's waving hands make up numbers. Even the DNA proves p4t math is a complete failure.
does the flight path confirms the numbers given? I mean do the 1.7 Gs corresponds with the flight path recorded on the FDR ?
were the plane parts found near Pentagon ever officially identified as flight 77 parts?
Originally posted by cesura
were the plane parts found near Pentagon ever officially identified as flight 77 parts?
I cannot improve on trebor451's answer to this.Will
Originally posted by Michal
were the plane parts found near Pentagon ever officially identified as flight 77 parts?
Originally posted by Lillydale
Originally posted by Michal
were the plane parts found near Pentagon ever officially identified as flight 77 parts?
When you parse your way through all the BS about the FDR, the answer is NO. The parts were never identified as belonging to AA77 but I am sure this is off topic.
Originally posted by Lillydale
When you parse your way through all the BS about the FDR, the answer is NO. The parts were never identified as belonging to AA77 but I am sure this is off topic.
Originally posted by 911files
Originally posted by Lillydale
When you parse your way through all the BS about the FDR, the answer is NO. The parts were never identified as belonging to AA77 but I am sure this is off topic.
And you know this how?
Originally posted by Lillydale
Originally posted by 911files
Originally posted by Lillydale
When you parse your way through all the BS about the FDR, the answer is NO. The parts were never identified as belonging to AA77 but I am sure this is off topic.
And you know this how?
I would be happy to respond to this as well as the tripe underneath it but I have already had you OSers whine about me going off topic so....
Originally posted by 911files
In other words you don't know.
identified by literally hundreds of military and law enforcement officers (including NCIS agents)
Originally posted by iSunTzu
If for some reason you need more proof of 77 impacting the Pentagon besides all the witnesses, the FDR, RADAR, and DNA; you need to ask yourself why you fail to acknowledge the evidence and why no one can refute it.
Originally posted by Lillydale
Basically, your argument that I am wrong is this 'I have a friend that says they know some stuff but I cannot get ahold of them now but you just wait, I have proof, I just need to go get it and that might take a while.' Cute try.
[edit on 12/20/09 by Lillydale]
You are just bringing it back up again because you are hoping that you can spread your BS and then call my response off topic and have it removed. You will not go to that thread because you might have to produce proof. It is completely dishonest to claim you will not go there because you do not want to discuss it...AS YOU CONTINUE TO DISCUSS IT. You will not get another response from me here about this. If you actually have some proof, come show it and shut my thread down before it even gets a whole page. Why not go to some "no proof" thread if you have all the proof? Wouldnt that be neat to just shut me up so quickly? Instead, you will respond to this, knowing I am not coming back and somehow consider that a victory. I will go wait in my thread for anyone with some proof. You stay here and talk about it and how you dont want to talk about it.
No, I'm not going to a thread and get involved in fruitless 'no evidence' to support it thread. I am on ATS to discuss the FDR decode.
Originally posted by iSunTzu
reply to post by Lillydale
It did not take 8 years to decode the FDR. It was decoded in January 2002. The it was not Flight 77 was proved false on 911, and in January 2002 it was backed up as false with the first decode by the NTSB.