It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JFrickenK
What I do know is that there is no way Hanni Hanjour could have brought that plane not only around the 270 degree spiral, but over either the antenna mast or over the Navy annex and had it fly so low and near level as was depected by the security cameras.
Burlingame, Maybe... Hanjour, No.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
I'm scratching my head, but I still can't work out what you're hoping to achieve here.
Originally posted by ImAPepper
We all have a strong feeling as to who and why it was allegedly hacked.
Originally posted by JFrickenK
Originally posted by Gamolon
Was the FAA animation based on the FDR?
I can only assume that it was as I don't believe I have downloaded that FOIA release.
< checks >
Nope, not in the slot I have assigned for it.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by JFrickenK
Oh, here we go again...and yes, this is the topic, since it relates to the FDR.
The final lat/long in the final subframe decoded by Warren Stutt is north of the downed lightpoles.
For about the umpteenth time, the Lat/Long accuracy of the IRS is not that precise. THAT is the only thing the FDR has to use...
Is there other flight information out there that people can look at to see similar inaccuracies for comparison?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by JFrickenK
JFK, are you "JohndoeXLC" over on YouTube???
Cool. Then by extension of that reasoning it could have easily been North of the Citgo and no one would be the wiser.
Originally posted by JFrickenK
reply to post by thomk
Off topic but what I said is true.
I am not Rob.
Do I need to provide you with my Admin logs from there ?
Originally posted by JFrickenK
You are very close to joining Farmer and the other idiots in my ignore list here.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by JFrickenK
Cool. Then by extension of that reasoning it could have easily been North of the Citgo and no one would be the wiser.
False. Illogical.
Originally posted by thomk
Hey Pepper,
Oh do share. For those of us who are out of the loop...
[Here or U2U. Your choice.]
LoL.
tom
Originally posted by Gamolon
With all the "North of the Citgo" eyewitnesses placing the plane "North of the Citgo", can anyone please tell me which of those eyewitness are incorrect about the flight path up to the "North of the Citgo" point the jet was supposedly visually seen at by all of them?
I have looked at the top down picture of the Pentagon with the flight paths of the witnesses drawn in yellow. How come the incoming flight path for most of them do not match?
Originally posted by JFrickenK
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by JFrickenK
Oh, here we go again...and yes, this is the topic, since it relates to the FDR.
The final lat/long in the final subframe decoded by Warren Stutt is north of the downed lightpoles.
For about the umpteenth time, the Lat/Long accuracy of the IRS is not that precise. THAT is the only thing the FDR has to use...
Cool. Then by extension of that reasoning it could have easily been North of the Citgo and no one would be the wiser.
Thanks.