It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
G. Fuel Quantity Indicating and Measurement
(1) The fuel quantity indicating system (AMM 28-41-00/001) has tank
units, compensators, and densitometers that supply fuel volume and
density measurements to the FQIS processor. The FQIS processor uses
these measurements to compute the weight of the fuel in each fuel
tank.
Fuel quantity data, measured by probes in each tank, is fed to the fuel quantity processor where it is corrected for density then displayed on a Fuel Quantity Indicator for each tank. Total fuel quantity, from a separate calculation, is shown on the Total Fuel Quantity Indicator and is also provided to the FMC.
JFK, do you have the ability to see a list of the EICAS messages? If so, see if there is one associated with the Surge Tank and Density.
No there isn't Rob, But that signal gets combined with the main tank density and that is displayed.
So, an exclusive parameter can be recorded without an associated EICAS.
Pretty much what I thought.
(...)
Of course i never seen such a Density EICAS caution in flight and would have to refer to the QRH (Quick Reference Handbook)
Originally posted by turbofan
My guess is that they're trying to prove that FLT_DECK_DOOR was
connected and functioning by showing other parameters updating data
which do not show a physical connection to the FDAU.
Originally posted by 911files
Smoke and mirrors. I have already been alerted to the next 'smoke and mirrors' diversion and am already working on it. I may have it shut down through 'back channels' already, but we will see. The P4T crowd is desperately trying to discredit the Warren RO. I wonder why?
ETA: Check your U2U for details doc.
[edit on 9-12-2009 by 911files]
Originally posted by discombobulator
Originally posted by 767doctor
Now, JFK, are you any closer to finding a signal path from the door sensor to EICAS?
Of course he isn't.
He doesn't even know how to read the manual.
Originally posted by JFrickenK
I am looking for any path to the outputted file, That is why I stuck the "or" into "EICAS, FDAU, or FDR"
Also had you been keeping up, 5 or 6 pages ago I have admitted to misreading a label early in that circuit trace.
Originally posted by 767doctor
Tino,
My curiosity got the best of me as to why PfT was suddenly talking about this parameter, since it has absolutely nothing to do with the flight deck door....especially why JFK kept referring to EICAS, with regard to the S TANK DENSITY parameter.
Originally posted by JFrickenK
And I reply again. I AM NOT PFT.
Originally posted by trebor451
Originally posted by JFrickenK
And I reply again. I AM NOT PFT.
Of course not. You are an admin there. You post there. You are carrying Cap't Bob's water from there. You are arguing their story line.
If you do not want to be associated with PFT, then I would recommend you rescind your admin privileges there. As things stand right now, you are nothing but a toady for Balsamo, doing his bidding here while he works on his DVD and hat sales. Is LC a bit slow these days that you need to head elsewhere?
Of course. You are not PFT.
Originally posted by 767doctor
Aha! I see where they got confused. JFK found that there are tank probes and confused those with densitometers. After all, how much crap could there possibly be a fuel tank?
Originally posted by JFrickenK
reply to post by TrickoftheShade
This thread is about data, not witnesses.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
But all the witnesses who are at all credible say that the plane flew over the building. So obviously the FDR is fake. So any conclusions drawn from it are worthless.
That's what I been told anyway boss.