It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by adam_zapple
Very plain to see...however JFK has stated that he believes the FDR data to be faked, which would still invalidate any of PFT's claims which rely on the data.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by JFrickenK
JFK, are you in agreement with P4T member 'Obwon' and the ridiculous claims that the FDR found at the Pentagon was NOT from AAL 77?
That particualr member (who, BTW, admits he's NOT a pilot, and doesn't like to fly all that much as a passenger...hmm, perfect fodder for the P4T site, if indicative of their membership base) seems to think that Rob Balsamo is of the same opinion re: the FDR.
IF anyone truly believes that, and isn't just saying so in order to keep the $$$ rolling in for DVDs anf T-shirts...well, then I'd have to wonder about their mental stability and reasoning skills.
Point is, despite all of the foregoing about surge tank parameters, and FDR values for same...it is ludicrous to go off on that tangent in the vain hope of "proving" falsification!!!
42 hours of data!!! How?
Originally posted by trebor451
And I love the constant "I don't know where I am but we're making good time!" approach of the LC admin JFK.
Originally posted by JFrickenK
Originally posted by Pilgrum
Originally posted by JFrickenK
It would invalidate ANY research done using John Farmers release ( as a basis ) to the general public of an FOIA which he claims to have recieved from the NTSB.
We are literally talking about 10's of thousands of hours of research from both sides of the fence over the past few years.
This is why this question must be answered.
Edit to add - And that does include ALL of Warren Stutt's work as it is also based upon the .FDR file which was included within John Farmers release.
It's a possibility that occurred to me also very early in the piece (that eventually the integrity of the file would come into question) so I looked into it IE any possibility that the raw FDR file used by Warren was different to the earlier released file.
Warren obtained his via an individual FOIA request dated April 6, 2009 and it's in the ISO he made available for download of the entire CD he received. I also happened to have a copy of the original released raw FDR file used in the PFT readout2 that was obtained via a separate earlier FOIA request.
I've done a full binary comparison of the 2 raw files and they are absolutely identical in every respect. They also both work with Warren's decoder producing identical results.
Just wanted to clear that up for any doubters out there.
[edit on 8/12/2009 by Pilgrum]
Thank you for that Pilgrum...
I guess that lets Farmer off the hook so I now retract any and all statements I have made regarding Farmer faking that portion of the data.
Originally posted by JFrickenK
Originally posted by trebor451
And I love the constant "I don't know where I am but we're making good time!" approach of the LC admin JFK.
Please provide a reference to where I have ever said those words.
Thank you.
Originally posted by JFrickenK
As far as raking in money, have you had a look at Farmer's site recently ?
I wonder how his book sales are doing.
( I guess the donate button was not enough )
Originally posted by JFrickenK
Originally posted by trebor451
And I love the constant "I don't know where I am but we're making good time!" approach of the LC admin JFK.
Please provide a reference to where I have ever said those words.
Thank you.
Originally posted by 911files
Originally posted by JFrickenK
As far as raking in money, have you had a look at Farmer's site recently ?
I wonder how his book sales are doing.
( I guess the donate button was not enough )
Do you have any idea how much all of that stuff I have on that site cost me? Do you have any idea how much is cost to take the FBI, FAA, and NTSB to court? One person out there was kind enough to buy a second-hand cassette to mp3 unit so I could convert the cassettes sent by the CMH to mp3 for the site so you could access them for free. Do you know how much it costs to do field trips to interview witnesses and examine facilities?
Of course you don't, you just troll the net and criticize the efforts of others. I've raised less than a thousand dollars via the donate button in the two years it has been up. The filing fee, costs of service, etc ate up that money. The volumes of CMH interviews, I had to pay for those. FAA records beyond what was requested by the Court case ate up everything raised on the site and more.
And by the way, that is the 'not-so-good-looking' John Farmer's book, not mine. Mine does not come out until the end of next year. And I hope it does very well so that I can recoup some of the thousands I have already spent on the project.
Originally posted by JFrickenK
I guess he failed to read this post.
Originally posted by trebor451
Originally posted by JFrickenK
Originally posted by trebor451
And I love the constant "I don't know where I am but we're making good time!" approach of the LC admin JFK.
Please provide a reference to where I have ever said those words.
Thank you.
Please read up on "literary devices" and how they are used to convey ironical remarks such as sarcasm and satire.
Specifically, it could be an aphorism, which is a concise statement containing a subjective truth or observation cleverly and pithily written.
Or perhaps it was parody or epiphany. All of those could describe the phrase I used above.
In case you don't know this (and it is patently apparent you don't), you don't actually have to have *said* anything specific or precise when you are referenced via a literary device. Its a general reference. You are flailing around, confirming to all observers that the Boeing aircraft maintenance book in your hands is about as foreign to you as a cell phone is to a monkey, yet you still post comment after comment, thinking that you are contributing to the conversation but in reality are merely displaying only the illusion of intellectual progress.
But press on, in any event, JFK! Your rearward-orifice persona matches your monkey-cell phone discussion abilities.
Originally posted by 911files
Originally posted by JFrickenK
I guess he failed to read this post.
No, I read that post. But that does not get you off the hook for making the suggestion in the fiirst place without any evidence to back it up. It is a common theme from the CIT/P4T crowd and it gets old after awhile.
Originally posted by JFrickenK
I was referring to all the books which you have littered your site with after you reopened it in your name.
In any event this conversation is WAY off topic and perhaps an Admin here can split it into another thread ( which I will not be participating in ) or delete it.
Originally posted by 911files
Originally posted by JFrickenK
I was referring to all the books which you have littered your site with after you reopened it in your name.
In any event this conversation is WAY off topic and perhaps an Admin here can split it into another thread ( which I will not be participating in ) or delete it.
Yep, in the two years I've been using the Amazon associate program I have not had the first payout. Last I checked I have less than ten bucks earned in two years.
No sir, it is not off topic. You are questioning the data source(s) related to the topic and I am responding to those questions and accusations. People have a right to know. I certainly hope the moderator leaves these posts so that your accusations stand for all to see.
Originally posted by turbofan
reply to post by JFrickenK
I'm not certain 'how' the TANK DENSITY word is figured, it seems to take
information from the Fuel tank level sensors and possibly signals from the
densitometers in each wing to produce to value.
The output to the FDAU appears to come from bit lines shown in the upper right hand corner of the Fuel Quantity Processor. If you'd like I can spend
more time finding out 'how' the value is stored?
Originally posted by JFrickenK
Originally posted by 767doctor
Can anyone summarize what this latest claim is all about? I see JFK reference column 106 - that's not a parameter, so I guess my question is: what is the parameter in question. And why is PFT talking about it? Are they saying that since there's no connection from (whatever column 106 is) to EICAS, that the parameter is recorded magically?
Honestly, I don't understand what they are getting at, other than further highlighting their own incompetence.
S TANK DENSITY?
[edit on 8-12-2009 by 767doctor]
Correct, S Tank density in column 106 of AAL77_tabular.csv
It is recorded and that value does fluctuate.
How is that value generated when there appears to be no datapath from the sensors within the surge tanks to the EICAS, FDAU, or FDR ?
I was looking at 28-21-02 of the SSM and trying to find a path back toward the FDR... and have thus far failed.
Originally posted by 767doctor
Now, JFK, are you any closer to finding a signal path from the door sensor to EICAS?