Originally posted by jthomas
This is how your spin works: we are supposed to accept your proposition that - magically - there was all of a sudden no traffic on the freeways, no people in the parking lots, no traffic on the bridges. How do you expect any rational person to accept that spin of yours, wholetruth?
That is the whole foundation of their argument, J, wouldn't you say? They *have* to claim that there was nobody in the parking lot, nobody on the roads, nobody up by the annex, nobody in Crystal City, nobody anywhere who saw the impact. The numbers of people who *could* have seen it are legion. Fervent and constant denial is CiT and PfT's only recourse.
They want to make everyone believe that the only people who saw what happened are the people *they* talked to. Anyone else? They are lying or holding back "da trooth" because they are either paid government shills or have had their hamster threatened at home.
Absolutely insane.
[edit on 23-10-2009 by trebor451]





