reply to post by Soloist
they either try to blast you as being in on it all, or they will make some new excuse up on why it cannot be correct.
Perhaps some might, however your analogy also applies to many debunkers, as we see demonstrated in this thread. I see very few truthers assuming their
“excuses” are the facts. Credible Truthers don’t have to assume, or create excuses, the facts stand on their own merit.
Or maybe even a totally new "hybrid fly-over but still crashed" theory that makes as much sense as all the others. Which is zero.
"hybrid fly-over but still crashed"? Truther don’t need to lie in supporting the truth. My opinion is only people, who have other agendas besides
supporting truth, will dream up the nonsense you speak of.
We live in such exciting times!
I wouldn’t call it exciting, perhaps more extraordinary times.
What I think is wonderful is the invention of the global internet, where we have the whole world at our finger tips, where the truth can be found and
backed by credible sources and science. This alone makes it hard for disinformation and propagandas to accomplish their goal, people are not as
stupid as some think.
My opinion is, the OP on this thread proved absolutely nothing in supporting the OS of flight 77 and lacked any credible sources into supporting the
OP claims.
edit on 9-1-2011 by impressme because: (no reason given)
