It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JFrickenK
reply to post by 767doctor
FFS, I didn't mean you as "you". I meant you as in "your company".
Nevertheless you did answer my question by in essence saying you don't give a f***.
I shall assume that is also your company's take on the question since you are their representative here.
Originally posted by JFrickenK
reply to post by 767doctor
No, Rob is saying that the AoA angle displayed is based on that -15 degree figure.
I disagree because if that were the case there would be notes stating such in the generic Boeing DFL and there are none, and indeed the calibration units in the custom DFL are degrees.
It was taken from an aircraft...
...and/or flight simulator...
I'm more interested in things like:
- Why the time/date stamp does not agree with the official story...
- Why the altimeter descending through 18,000 feet does not snap back, yet the ascending values are corrected ...
- Why there are no signs of engine damage, pole strikes, origin of white smoke, etc.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
No, that is completely incorrect. There is simply no way for an FDR to interface in the same way with a full-motion airliner simulator in the way you imply.
First I've heard of this issue with AA 77.
I think I've told you before. It depends greatly on the actual rate of descent at the time, and how fast the Baro set knob is turned. Go flying to see for yourself.
"white smoke" (if it actually existed) could simply have been a severed fuel or hydraulic line.
Hey WW, let me clarify this part of my post. I don't mean the FDR as a physical device; I meant the flight data file may have been created using a flight sim.
I may be confusing you. The time/date I'm referring to is the file creation date of the .fdr file. The FOIA CD-ROM contains the information when looking at the file details.
This file is created before the report of recovering the FDR in the Pentagon.
Originally posted by trebor451
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
I could almost understand if it was just on one plane. But it was on ALL the FDRs provided, making that an extremely unlikely possibility that all serial numbers everywhere were destroyed because of the impacts. Now if that doesn't spell coverup, I don't know what does. There is more on that in the thread I posted.
Why would the serial numbers be destroyed because of the impacts?
You people just can't get over the fact that you are not important enough to be given those serial numbers by the FBI. To risk a tad bit of moral equivalency here, who are YOU (and/or PfT and/or Cit and/or etc) to demand such information? You are nothing more than fodder for online entertainment in forums such as this, so why SHOULD the FBI or anyone, for that matter, give you anything?.
To simply say "To prove the aircraft were real" would really be one of the most absurd reasons for wanting those serial numbers, so I can see why your huffy indignation and making up stories and lies about why you can't get that information is your best tactic.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by turbofan
Hey WW, let me clarify this part of my post. I don't mean the FDR as a physical device; I meant the flight data file may have been created using a flight sim.
But, you see, ALL the other parameters aren't recorded, for the simulator, in the same way as on the real airplane.
What I mean is, on the real airframe there are physical switches, sensors, devices to supply the input --- in the computer of the simulator those actual devices don't exist, they are 'simulated'. (or, more correctly, their behaviour is simulated, but only when it's pertinent to what is displayed for the flight crew).
Example:
The proximity switches that determine the landing gear posiiton. In the simulator no such actual switches exist, the computer is merely programmed to show, visually, what would be seen on the real airplane --- same time for the gear to cycle, same light indications, etc. Also, the hydraulic guages can be programmed to "show" the effects, as the gear is operated, by simulating the 'bumps' in the pressure readings. There is no actual hydraulic system on the simulator, of course... (it has its own hydraulics, but that's different).
So, no....highly unlikely that the simulator could be used to somehow "fake" the FDR data. I suppose one could contact Sundstrand or Honeywell to ask them for clarification on this...
Originally posted by weedwhacker
But, you see, ALL the other parameters aren't recorded, for the simulator, in the same way as on the real airplane...
The proximity switches that determine the landing gear posiiton. In the simulator no such actual switches exist, the computer is merely programmed to show, visually, what would be seen on the real airplane ---
Is this, could this, merely be a case of when the file was created??? I mean, if the date stamp for the file creation was based on whatever system's internal clock settings at that time??
Your example of landing gear is one of the most basic to emulate ...