Man Charged After Making Coffee Naked: UPDATED

reply to post by blood0fheroes


It's fine to walk around your own home naked. As long as you're not parading in front of the windows for anyone on the street to see. People on the street don't have to be gazing into the house to notice a naked person. But this is why curtains were invented, to stop problems just like this.

I bet KoKo has been embarrassed at least a few times in her life, so I'm sure she understands the concept well enough. It would be interesting to hear her opinions on things like human clothes, being ashamed of nudity, the human anatomy being indecent etc.

I find this whole issue to be completely absurd, and I would take it to the point that people should be allowed to dance naked in their window if they so choose, it is after all their body, and their house.

The coffee! Won't somebody please think of the coffee?

Originally posted by Majic
The coffee! Won't somebody please think of the coffee?

Why would someone care about the coffee? It's possibly the most action it's had in a long time. The coffee should be doing quite well.

My understanding is the woman was on HIS property when it happened so she was tresspassing. And it wasn't the first time not to mention her husband is a cop. My opinion the guy was set up and she should be in jail for several things. Tresspassing and contributing to the delenquincy of a minor to start with

Originally posted by xxshadowfaxx
But this is why curtains were invented, to stop problems just like this.

That'd be fine if it wern't for the fact that closed curtains now make you a terrorist suspect.

I hope he wins his appeal; and files counter claims for trespassing, and her peeping tomfoolery contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

[edit on 3/29/10 by redmage]

OH SON! that means I can go to prison when I bush hog my pasture oh me.

What a joke I would file stalking or peeping charges against the lady. I had a neighbor one time he was cityfied and didnt know our ways and every time we started our stump hole water machine he would run on our property to see what we were doing. One day he just discapeared?

I hate nosy neighbors.

Update: Not Guilty as per verdict by jury on appeal..

A JURY took less than 20 minutes today to acquit a Virginia man accused of indecent exposure while walking naked around his own house. The Washington Post said Erick Williamson, 29 - dubbed "the naked guy" - was spotted wandering around his house in the nude by a passerby who was walking her seven-year-old son to school. Prosecutors said he made no effort to cover himself and was intentionally exposing himself, but jurors at Fairfax County Circuit Court found him not guilty of indecent exposure.

www.news.com.au...


I wonder if he can and will take this further after being aquitted...?


[edit on 7-4-2010 by cams]

As i didnt read the last post my rant is now without purpose...three cheers for common sense..hip hip etc etc etc

Now to sue the bitch for being on his property, wrongful arrest etc etc etc.




[edit on 8-4-2010 by andy1972]

reply to post by Finn1916


You shoulda gave her a porn flick and desentized her and then banged her....sheesh...in college and hasnt seen a penis....looks like shes not the one to talk to all liquored up eh...

Originally posted by cams
Update: Not Guilty as per verdict by jury on appeal..

A JURY took less than 20 minutes today to acquit a Virginia man accused of indecent exposure while walking naked around his own house. The Washington Post said Erick Williamson, 29 - dubbed "the naked guy" - was spotted wandering around his house in the nude by a passerby who was walking her seven-year-old son to school. Prosecutors said he made no effort to cover himself and was intentionally exposing himself, but jurors at Fairfax County Circuit Court found him not guilty of indecent exposure.

www.news.com.au...


I wonder if he can and will take this further after being aquitted...?

Wow, I'm glad for this turn of events.

He should have never been charged in the first place though. But it's still good that he was finally cleared of this insanity.

“It’s great to be not guilty but I still have a lot of wreckage to deal with. A lot of things that were torn apart because of what happened,” said Williamson.

By the time the jury found him not guilty, six months had passed and Williamson had been laid off, lost visitation rights with his young daughter and racked up $15,000 in legal bills.

The "naked man" is still having to recover from this ordeal. In this economy jobs are hard to come by. With that kind of publicity, many places might not even want to give him a chance.

I don't understand how any mother could keep the little girl from her father. It was obvious to anyone with any lick of sense that he should not have even been charged with anything. In some areas though CPS may take your child(ren) away if you let them visit because the government says you're failing to protect them.

Even when you go through the court system and are finally found not guilty, the damage the process can do can sometimes be unrepairable.

He should counter-sue them for spying through his windows. Look, walking around naked outside, fine, that's indecent exposure, but when you're walking around naked in your own home, there should be only one rule that applies; Don't like it? Don't f*cking look!!!

reply to post by xxshadowfaxx


Doesn't it make you wonder how several people happened upon him standing in his kitchen window naked? Passing the window to make coffee and being seen is one thing. Standing in front of the window naked in order to be seen by multiple passersby is indecent exposure. This is a wierd case.

My husband likes to swim naked in our pool. We have a privacy fence but someone could go out of their way to see him and then call the police on him. He goes out of his way not to be seen by neighbors but that does not mean some nosey neighbor might not see him if they spy long enough.

reply to post by Jessicamsa


Since multiple people saw this guy, I think the judge decided he was posing in the widow to be seen by passersby. It would be indecent exposure if he did that. What a wierd case! How do you tell his intent for sure.

It's people like that lady who pressed charges that are ruining America. This guy, in the end, did not violate the law. But because of that (derogatory term for female dog), his life is completely screwed up now.

Honestly, why are so many people part of the problem, and NOT the solution?