AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Breaking Alternative News discussion forum.  (rss)


Man Charged After Making Coffee Naked


<<  1    2    3    4  >>

Topic started on 21-10-2009 @ 04:37 PM by Jessicamsa


Man Charged After Making Coffee Naked


www.myfoxdc.com

SPRINGFIELD, Va. - A Springfield, Virginia man is facing an indecent exposure charge after a passerby spotted the man naked in his kitchen and reported it to police.

Eric Williamson, 29, is a commercial diver who grew up in Hawaii and rents home with several co-workers. Williamson told FOX 5's Will Thomas his roommates were not home and he walked into the kitchen to make coffee about 5:30 a.m. Monday.

"Yes, I wasn't wearing any clothes but I was alone, in my own home and just got out of bed. It was dark and I had no idea anyone was outside looking in at me," Williamson said.

(visit the link for the full news article)



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more Breaking Alternative News topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 21-10-2009 @ 04:37 PM by Jessicamsa
+2 more 

Okay, so now we cannot chose to walk around naked in our own home anymore?

I do not understand the insanity of this? If someone is in their own home, the person should have the right to walk around in the buff if he or she wants to do so.

If this person is convicted, will he have to register as a sex offender? How will his life be affected by a guilty verdict?

www.myfoxdc.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-10-2009 @ 04:40 PM by thisguyrighthere
+40 more 

I want to know what kind of person calls the cops for seeing somebody neud in their own home.

If anything the guy should have called the cops on the passerby for peeping.

I guess the law is like racism now? First one to call it wins.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-10-2009 @ 04:42 PM by underduck


This is silly. I just have to hope that this will inevitably be thrown out when and if this goes to trial. 1. Dont look in my house 2. what's wrong with a naked body (no matter how attractive or unattractive it is). There is no way this guy will be put on a sex offender list for this. We just have to have faith that there are still some decent human beings in places of small powers.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 21-10-2009 @ 04:43 PM by Miraj


reply to post by Jessicamsa



Is it illegal?

To be honest, I pretty regularly wander around my house naked when Im taking a shower and what not. (Assuming Im alone)

Seriously, maybe they shouldn't be staring in people's houses.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-10-2009 @ 04:45 PM by severdsoul


Thats some BS, technicaly they should be listed as a peeping tom, and he is the one in trouble.

What a messed up world we live in.


But be sure to catch the show later where they beat people and cut them apart , thats ok for everyone to watch, but someone naked... EEEEEEEeewwwww cant have that.. the shame , the horror...

man people just blow my mind some times.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-10-2009 @ 04:45 PM by severdsoul


Thats some BS, technicaly they should be listed as a peeping tom, and he is the one in trouble.

What a messed up world we live in.


But be sure to catch the show later where they beat people and cut them apart , thats ok for everyone to watch, but someone naked... EEEEEEEeewwwww cant have that.. the shame , the horror...

man people just blow my mind some times.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-10-2009 @ 04:45 PM by mythatsabigprobe


Hope he wasn't using a french press.

It's absurd that anyone would call the cops for something they wouldn't have seen if they weren't invading the guy's privacy in the first place.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-10-2009 @ 04:48 PM by jam321


Just plain wrong.

I could understand if the guy was posing in the window. But not for this.

I think a warning about making sure the curtains are closed would have been sufficient.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-10-2009 @ 04:49 PM by _Phoenix_


Well it seems likely that it was dark and he had the lights on for the woman to notice him inside, therefore it would be almost impossible for him to notice anyone out there because of the reflections on his window from the inside, let alone try and show her his private part on purpose.

Really stupid things going on these days.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 21-10-2009 @ 04:50 PM by MrSmith
+14 more 

You cant make coffee naked???

Yet you can make a music video that is basically a porno, have Shakira dress in a skin color bathing suit and then throw her leg over her head giving your young children the 'money shot' like she's a stripper. Not to mention that wickedly awesome black tight outfit... God I love that video.

Point is, Shakira's video is far more provocative than some smelly dude who just woke up making coffee scratching his balls & ass.

Some times I dont get the law.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-10-2009 @ 04:50 PM by MrSmith


Edit - Double post

[edit on 21-10-2009 by MrSmith]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-10-2009 @ 04:50 PM by Miraj


reply to post by jam321



Unless he shouted "Hey check it out!!!" Then did some pelvic thrusts at the window, they should have given him a warning.

I doubt this case will go far, but soccer moms can't stand the human body.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-10-2009 @ 04:51 PM by LadySkadi


reply to post by Jessicamsa


Crap!

*runs off to close the blinds*

O.k.

Just plain ludicrous... though the same thing did happen to [actor] Matthew McConaughey, something about playing the drums, naked in his own backyard...



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-10-2009 @ 04:56 PM by underduck


reply to post by LadySkadi



I remember that. I remember saying something like this was the best they could do to get "Matthew McConaughey" and "naked" in the headline to sell more tabloid magazines.

There is certainly something messed up when you can have a few violent scenes in a movie ... and keep it rated PG13. Once there is an exposed breast ... BAM! ... R ... unacceptable. Well I guess thats what you get when your country was founded by puritans.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-10-2009 @ 04:59 PM by marg6043


reply to post by thisguyrighthere



He should do a counter sue against the person that saw him naked inside his home, for trespassing and been a Peeping Tom.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 21-10-2009 @ 05:01 PM by Aggie Man


The accusing individual will have the IMPOSSIBLE task of proving that the man making the coffee was, in fact, naked. Word vs. word. Unless the naked coffee dude admitted it to police (if he admitted it, then he deserves whatever he gets for being stupid). Furthermore, if I were the coffee dude, I would file a cross complaint for the "peeping tom" invading his privacy.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-10-2009 @ 05:02 PM by PsykoOps


It's not long ago when I heard someone say that if you see a naked girl through her window you're a pervert peeping tom. If a girl sees you naked from the street you're a pervert flasher. No win situation.
This cant go to court, first of all you can charge someone for indicent exposure if they're naked in their own home. Any exposure resulting from that is from invasion of privacy by someone else. Just as well he could've been charged for being naked in the shower.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-10-2009 @ 05:02 PM by twitchy


You got guys on prime time television in a show called Jackass drinking horse semen and sticking toy cars in their rectum in front of tens of millions of people, and they are worried about a guy making coffee naked in his own home?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-10-2009 @ 05:04 PM by Jessicamsa


Originally posted by Aggie Man
The accusing individual will have the IMPOSSIBLE task of proving that the man making the coffee was, in fact, naked. Word vs. word. Unless the naked coffee dude admitted it to police (if he admitted it, then he deserves whatever he gets for being stupid). Furthermore, if I were the coffee dude, I would file a cross complaint for the "peeping tom" invading his privacy.


The man already admitted it at the time of his arrest.

Apparently he had went back to bed and the cops bust into his home and arresting him while calling him a pervert.



   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2    3    4  >>





























































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.005 seconds
Page processed in 0.095 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.