It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Moon: 19 58 48.31 N 21 11 35.57 E

page: 5
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

+17 more 
posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 01:27 AM
I wasn't going to bother posting this but whatever i guess lol

That's starting at your location and using the ruler following a heading of about 104-105 degress every 21 miles or so.

That whole giant strip image across the moon is filled with similar anomolies that repeat over and over again and slightly differently each time. I was going to post a long time about such a thing along the top edge of the map until I noticed the repeating and then more all over the place doing the same thing. I figured it was just debris floating around in the satellite between the lens and a protective piece of glass.

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 01:42 AM
Well that about wraps it up.

Good work, Soboro!

I wish people weren't always in such a hurry to declare outlandish claims, like moon bases or soul catchers.

[edit on 10/22/2009 by pjslug]

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 01:59 AM
I'm no expert on moon bases, but we are assuming that NASA or tptb want to keep it secret.

If they have the technology to actually build a moon base, wouldn't they try to make it "blend in" with its surroundings a bit better? Sounds a little weird of them to build a huge square fort on the moon and then try to edit the photos so we can't see it.

Or is it alien???

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 02:06 AM
what interests me is the encircled letter "S" in the center of the object... it kind of looks like

a spaceship landing pad?

i don't think aliens would use latin letter S...

[edit on 22/10/2009 by ranswer]

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 02:18 AM
thanks i'm going to spend tonight looking at all of this...time to put on a pot of coffee.

but in all seriousness, always thought it was weird that we landed on the moon, played a few holes of golf, and then were we're done with it.

then hear people say things like "there is still so much we don't know"

i know we rushed the space race because a) had to get there before those darn reds did and b) to appease the kennedy promise of getting there before the 70's. but why just stop at some golf.

im willing to accept that these are either google tricks (if so shame on them, because people like us really are trying to figure the right answer and this hurts everything) or that its camera anomalies.

how do we get an official answer? one way or the other

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 02:28 AM

Originally posted by ranswer

i don't think aliens would use latin letter S...

[edit on 22/10/2009 by ranswer]

Yes I definitely got the S letter (or maybe a 5?)

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 02:40 AM
Goot post Soboro!

Regarding current topic.
Peoples make again an again the same mistake:

They look into fake images: i mean, images beyound the real resolution of the photography or original digital image, and while looking in this fake images, they think they see reality.

To explain: images are fake in the way that they are interpollated, filtered, sharpened, filtered again (remember anizotropic filtering from maybe any 3D video software driver for an example), scalled, false perspective added etc etc. It is what google earth do when overrzoom and add perspective.
Also, people zoom beyound that what original resolution is. way beyound. The software let them to do it, but the software doesn't tell you what is happening there..

I remember Internos said, and also Johhny Anonymous also: don't judge the image beyond their real will hunt NOTHING but IMAGINARY THINGS, regarding shapes, appearance, texture etc.

What people see: real image artifacts, like this dark patches here, which can be dirt on glass or in the scanner used or something like this, emanated from how technical solutions works.

What they also see: just software creation: compression and filtering artifacts (just like jpeg compression artifacts is) zoomed, sharpened and interpolated in something which looks like details to the eye

What else is adding here: a lot of pareidolia.

Final result: "they hide things from our eyes", conspiration. And a lot of interests regarding this cool issue ("moon mistery"). Show. And some people, knows this market potential, and feed the show about that documentary "moon rising" from Jose Escamilla (also the "rod" hunter).

Don't go beyond real resolution, or if you do, then don't let yourself be fooled by false information added there...inclusive pareidolia.

[edit on 22/10/09 by depthoffield]

[edit on 22/10/09 by depthoffield]

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 02:50 AM
Very interesting find..

It certainly looks like a structure.

I have been able to find it on my google moon and did a bit of a search of the areain question .. and not too far away is this beauty.. what appears to be a massive chasm into the moon.....

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 03:16 AM
And still they refuse to listen. Too busy caught up in their little theories for which they think are clever. This case was closed conclusively by Soboro and yet some of you are still debating over whether a piece of debris caught in a lens is actually a base on the moon. No wonder they don't take us seriously.

[edit on 22-10-2009 by boomadatigger]

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 03:40 AM

Originally posted by boomadatigger
And still they refuse to listen. Too busy caught up in their little theories for which they think are clever. This case was closed conclusively by Soboro and yet some of you are still debating over whether a piece of debris caught in a lens is actually a base on the moon. No wonder they don't take us seriously.

[edit on 22-10-2009 by boomadatigger]

Until the debunkers can explain how the object in the OP also has radar return data this thing is far from wrapped up. All the photo anomalies in the World don't cover that one. Some of the "black smudges"? Obviously but don't be so quick to accept the first explanation and slap it on everything.

The first object photo looks like a walled compound of some kind with at least one "skyscraper" shape building and what looks like a disc type UFO sitting on the ground.

I keep wondering why would they build up walls around these compounds on the moon? It gives the impression of a defensive perimeter of some sort which raises all kinds of interesting questions....

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 03:42 AM
reply to post by wakinup13

LMAO !!!

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 03:56 AM

Originally posted by Grayelf2009
I vote that the same group that sent a balloon up and took a picture from space of the earth redirect their camera to the moon this time.

Or what about one of those big telescopes that sets on top of a mountain, isin't their one in Arizona by Flagstaff somewhere?

Excellant find s&f

there is .. but ATS hasn't heard a Whisper seriously from any of them... seriously and I've always wondered why myself.. for YEARS now.. and we don't have ANY solid picture we can view either.. i'm sure they ops are either outright monitored or covertly.

anyways.. back on topic..

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 04:01 AM
reply to post by draknoir2

Ahhh...that teeny, tiny, weeny element of doubt..

Always a psychological winner.

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 04:07 AM

Originally posted by ranswer
hmm, just noticed something, not sure if anyone posted this in other threads as i dont have time to go through all of them but...

when you switch to the "lunar orbiter mosaic" imagery taken back in 1960's, the thing disappears, it's only visible in the "visible imagery" which, if i understand it correctly, was taken in 90's...

1960's picture
1990's picture

not sure if this is caused by lower resolution or because it was put there only recently... whatever it is.


posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 04:22 AM
Wow! So out of place. Looks like a compound of some sort, with a dome structure within it's walls. And if I was to build a compound, I'd do it on an open plane, so that I have clear vision in all directions. I hope there is someone who can confirm what I think I see, and perhaps reconstruct some more. Have a look at these:

[edit on 22-10-2009 by 2Faced]

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 04:40 AM
GREAT FIND OP!!! S&F w/out a doubt!!!

Can we trust .. ULCN 2005

Here's a little info of where the pics/data are coming from...

2. How accurate are the maps?
Because the Moon is so far away, it is hard to measure exactly where things on it are. The Visible and Elevation layers were created using images and data that were aligned to the

The Unified Lunar Control Network 2005, the most up-to-date understanding of exactly where things are on the Moon, created by the experts at the U.S. Geological Survey. These maps are designed for mission planning, but they will probably still need to be updated once the next generation of lunar mapping satellites arrive at the Moon. The Charts layer includes maps that were made before these updated coordinate systems existed, and so the positions of features in the charts are only approximate. The high-resolution maps used in the Apollo layer are similarly approximate.

3. Can I see the Moon data using the Google Earth client?
Not yet, but we're working on it.

4. Where did all this data come from?
The data used to create the Visible and Elevation layers, as well as some of the high-resolution maps used in the Apollo layers, are courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey.

Much of the rest of the material for the Apollo layer is derived from NASA's Apollo Lunar Surface Journal. The USGS Geologic Atlas of the Moon, the Lunar Chart (LAC) Series, and some Apollo imagery are provided by the Lunar and Planetary Institute, managed by USRA.
Google Moon ref info

Keeping this in mind, I would DEFINITELY like to see another source(s) to back up Google Moon data. Otherwise, I smell a BIG RAT and will toss this out the window for validity as any good researcher would.

Does it seem like there's only 1 source of info of moon pics ?? ok ok .. perhaps 2, NASA and Google Moon.. *grin*.. with the BILLIONS of ppl on the planet, not 1 has a telescope that can see the landings? *grin*.. hmmmm.. kinda makes you wounder ..

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 04:51 AM
Seems to me we had another thread about similar looking object, but I think we were using a different program to view the images. I can't seem to find the thread now but I think the consensus was that the objects were some kind of artifact from the software.

Here's some similar looking artifacts I captured Near the Lunar Mach crater. I don't mean to get off topic, but these images remind me of what we see in the OP's pics - just a bit different. The red outline is mine the rest is either the moon pictures or part of the viewing software.

[edit on 22-10-2009 by verylowfrequency]

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 05:23 AM
Great find!

There are LOADS of these geometric shaped structures in the nearby area.

There are two curious characteristics they all share:

They are all orientated along a North/South axis, that is the apparent cube and rectangular shapes are along a N/S axis, and they also appear to be situated on top of some of the weird black marks around the area.

I have found half a dozen in about 15 minutes of looking.

There is one in particular that is very interesting, in that it has a cubed shaped superstructure, and there is a circular 'battlement' type structure with a tower on top of the cube.

Another looks to be a 'twin' in terms of layout to the OP's find (5).

Very artificial looking.

Here are the co-ords:

1) 18°50'52.77"N 24°25'26.37"E (cube and tower)
2) 18°51'30.06"N 24°20'43.70"E (also appears to have a central tower)
3) 18°52'51.23"N 24° 8'38.40"E (cuboid)
4) 19° 2'27.50"N 24°30'20.74"E
5) 18°59'37.09"N 24°48'55.27"E ('layout' very similar to the OP's find)
6) 19°25'32.09"N 24°30'43.84"E (small buildings in semi-circle, with right angled pipe?
7) 19°33'40.06"N 24°16'21.97"E

If i had another 20 minutes to spare, i would probably find plenty more, the moon is literally covered with anomalies.

Happy trails.

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 08:58 AM

Originally posted by MOTT the HOOPLE
Dude! That's an end game pic there! For sure! AWESOME!
OMG Maybe Richard Hoagland was right after all

[edit on 21-10-2009 by MOTT the HOOPLE]

Hogland should be all over this as the base is located approximately at 19.5 degrees latitude. And anyone that knows Hogland know that he is very focused on this as it relates to hyperdimensional physics. Is there an intentional reason why this artifact (for lack of a better word) is located at that latitude?

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 09:18 AM

Originally posted by nomadros
This is on behalf of ocker, donkey86, mcmauro, probably others and now myself.

Google moon 19 58 48.31 N 21 11 35.57 E (on version 5.x) has been brought up in 3 previous posts about moon anomolies and whilst everyone has an opinion regarding some odd shaped moon rock that may or may not be say, a trans dimensional galactic battle cruiser, an old alien space base, space mining or for all I know Elvis' grave, everyone appears to body serve explaining this nearly 300m long do-da.

And if Nasa can point to a pixel or 2 and go "Lcross crash!" then this has to be well worth a look and discussion.

I'm not going to post a pic as it's already on ATS (do a search with the co-ords) , but I'd like you to look at this via Google and feel the WTF and FFS as you zoom in.

Another Grub post if you have something to Post post it.
I for one will not backtrack to work your thoughts OUT!


new topics

top topics

<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in