Moon: 19 58 48.31 N 21 11 35.57 E

reply to post by ranswer


A couple of possible things.
1. It was brushed out of the 60's version as a cover and missed latter.
2. The structure was constructed between early picture date and the 90s version.
3. Google is playing a game with the public.





[edit on 21-10-2009 by donkey86]

Pluto Nash's home?

reply to post by donkey86


1. It was brushed out of the 60's version as a cover and missed latter.
doesn't seem very likely, i would think that if they censored objects from the 60's imagery than they would keep some kind of database of what and where they deleted, forgetting to delete them again in newer imagery is very improbable

2. The structure was constructed between early picture date and the 90s version.
aye, that's what i think

3. Google is playing a game with the public.
may be... it would be worth trying to find official images from NASA... if they are publicly available on the net... i'll try if i have time

S&F

superb finding...... com'on google spill the beans.....

OP, good catch!

Wouldn't it be funny if John Lear was 100% right about all the "nonsense" he kept telling here on ATS? The latest NASA mission was such a strange event that I'm open to a lot more possibilities ...

If you guys notice, there are several craters surrounding this "base" of comparable size which are seen in both images. The "base" has a great deal more contrast so I do not believe that it was in the original 60's image. This seems pretty small and subtle to be a Google Easter Egg IMHO.

[edit on 21-10-2009 by wanderingwaldo]

Why are all the moon pictures that are released to the public always grainy, blurry, smudged, black and white and not close up?

We should all pitch in and buy NASA some color film...

If I didn't know any better I'd think they are trying to hide something ...

PEACE and LOVE...

this reminds me of a fort of some sort but why build a fort on the moon ???

[edit on 10/21/2009 by dashar]

great find! definatlely the best annomoly pic of the moon ive seen...looks man made to me, maybe john lear aint so crazy after all....

Look at the large X in the square that isn't natural.

I'm glad the truth is slowly coming out. I have written for years that life is within the Planets and Moons.

Maybe it's a vent.

Excellant find. Starred and flagged.
How does one go about finding something like that? The moon is an awfully big place.

[edit on 10/21/2009 by MissSmartypants]

reply to post by MissSmartypants


There would be a few people with lots of time on their hands to study each pixel. I have no doubt.

Alternatively, they might be tipped off by an inside, quiet source.

paging Zorgon ... paging Zorgon...

please report to this thread for analysis of moon anomaly.

There is no doubt in my mind the structure is of intelligent design,and anyone who knows anything about geometry,or even a good artist could tell you that just from the lines. The question is,who built it?

can a large ground based telescope with 50megapixel camera not get a better look at this? Just curious what it would take to get decent resolution shots from Earth if money were no object..

This pic immediately reminds me and is, in fact, very similar to an oil rig platform.

Could this have been spoofed?

Found a youtube video (or 2)of the anomaly..










[edit on 21/10/09 by blupblup]

The image looks a little different on google earth for linux... maybe even clearer. Here:

Is that a #5 or a letter "S" on some kind of landing pad?

Is that a tower on the left? This thing looks almost like a missile launch pad.

[edit on 21-10-2009 by jaktenstid]

reply to post by jaktenstid


It sure does look like a 5 in that pic

Looks like a Simcity Helicopter pad or something.