Yeah but since you cannot disprove god, because go is not really a scientific notion, its not quantifiable, how is that logical? can you really claim
the absence of proof to be anti-proof? I mean sure you can argue how accurate specific texts are or how practical certian rituals are but if god or
gods is intepreted broadly you cant quantify that. If you said, god created the universe two minutes before I wrote this post and created the entire
universe to appear to be much older than that, you cant disprove that statement, its not a, here is this word again, scientific statement. This
statement is not compatible with the scientific method, so you could not prove it, or disprove it for that matter. The concept of god functions on the
same principle. You cannot prove it anymore than you can disprove it. So where is the logic in that? Since so many atheists throw around the word
logic and reason we should take a look at those words.
A manuel of logic (Welton, James (1896). A manual of logic. University tutorial series. 1 (2nd ed.). W.B. Clive.) defines logic as the art of science
and reasoning, science being defined as the system of gaining knowledge based on the scientific method, reasoning defined as a cognitive process of
looking for reasons. Well we have already established that the scientific method cannot apply here because you can make statements that could be true
but are not testable. So that would leave reasoning. Looking for the reason, well this does not make sense to me as you can reason on both sides of
this arguement. So one definition does not seem for logic makes it seem strange to me because it is an irrelavent term god is not logical so how can
you say that logic says there is no god? Now lets look at another angle, math... and bad geometery puns. Lets go out here and say in order to be
Logical you have to have a proof. Now I am no math whiz so the actualy calculations are beyond me but I am sure there is a mathmatical proof against
god, if someone could help me and cite it that would be great. Now the one that some argue suggestest some sort of divine being is Bayes Theorem.
Again not a math guy but assumeing there is indeed a proof against god and a proof for god you cannot really use math in the god/no god arena either,
so no matter where you turn on the area of god Logic does not seem to come into play. Faith on the other hand is alittle simpler,lets define it as a
reasoned belief in something you cannot anwser, everyone seems to have it, faith in god or no god or maybe something completely different. The point I
am making is that by saying there is no god you are putting as much faith in your reasoned belief of no god or afterlife, as say someone who is
putting it in a god and afterlife. Now if someone attempts to belittle your beliefs of nothing, I think thats wrong, satire and good humor are one
thing, but sometimes people will do things to be spiteful because people do not believe what they do, take
www.blasphemyday.com... as an example,
yes some of their material has some satirical value (I like the image of jesus with the bubble that says BRB) but I cannot help but take away an
overall arogant and spiteful tone from it, they seem to say I do not believe in god and I think I am better than you because of it. Just seems, well,
mean and ignorant, and Im not even a follower of any clear religion and I dont believe in the divinity of christ. So basicly what I am saying is your
not that persecuted, get off your high horse. Atheism is not anymore of a logical anwser as Fly spaghetti monsterism is.
My first post on ATS, To long? or mean? maybe not the best first impression, oh the insecurities.