It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AnonymousMoose
A serious flaw in...your argument...
What I was always taught is that God is beyond our comprehension and beyond our human understanding, a day to God could be a hundred million years to us, who knows...or maybe they used word day to describe a period of time, since significant things happened during these periods, so they called them days...
The truth is nobody knows...does the Earth's creation affect my faith or my opinion of the Bible? Nope...and it shouldn't be of great concern to anybody in my opinion...
Originally posted by ooomonkeys
Since it seems that there are many Christians here I would like to ask a few honest questions that I have had for quite some time now.
With all of the strange laws littered within the Old Testament. Why did God ever find those laws to be acceptable? Since Jesus died on the cross we no longer have to follow them anymore? Did an all-knowing & all-powerful God change his mind on how he wants his children to act? What of the sexist laws that can be found in the New Testament, are we not supposed to follow those? Why not?
Originally posted by ooomonkeys
Why did an all-powerful all-knowing God change his laws?
Did he make a mistake?
So what laws are we supposed to follow now?
Since these passages are found in the New Testament, why are they not followed in present day churches?
Originally posted by Aoxoa
A lot of psychiatrists actually find god believers "Those who worship an invisible god who they will never even see, hear, touch or etc to be quite delusional."
Originally posted by Maslo
The polonium halos argument is questionable at best.
www.talkorigins.org...
www.talkorigins.org...
Originally posted by TarzanBeta
Originally posted by CHA0S
The bible says the Earth is around 6000 to 10,000 years old.
I request that the OP correct this erroneous statement.
Deny ignorance.
Originally posted by chiron613
In the beginning" is not specific. In the beginning of what?
Originally posted by Albastion
Originally posted by CHA0S
reply to post by undo
And we go back to square one..."In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth." It wasn't just the start of mankind...HE CREATED EARTH, IN THE BEGINNING, AS WELL AS THE HEAVENS, WHICH HE ALSO REFERRED TO AS THE SKIES. He did it in 6 days, and from my previous post, you can see your argument about the word "day" is now seriously flawed...
that's not the age of the earth. that's the beginning of the human dispensation. there's a difference.
[edit on 21/10/09 by CHA0S]
What makes you think a day for God is the same thing as a day for man? Do you really think that God and man would experience time in the same way?
Originally posted by Selahobed
You are under the assumption that the speed of light has always been constant, and if you do a quick google search you will see that there is evidence that the speed of light was faster in the past compared to the now.
Then you also have to factor in relativity, where space/time is proportional to to the amount of matter/energy in a specific place; the more matter/energy there is, the more "time" there is, and is the reason why the closer you get to the event horizon of a black hole the more time dialates.
So, time is not constant for all parts of the universe and is subjective to the observer. So with this in mind it is possible, factoring speed of light changes and relativity that the earth could still be a young earth.
As for carbon dating, puhhhlease! Most scientists with a modicum of integrity will tell you how incredibly inaccurate it is after 2000 years..
Originally posted by Jim Scott
Originally posted by Angus123
Originally posted by Jim Scott
reply to post by Angus123
Angus, are you a Christian?
second line
No... and I understand where you're headed. Jesus was both God and man. So I stand corrected. I have seen a more crystal clear example of two opposing ideas held at the same time.
Actually, that thought never entered my head. I was going to show you an illustration of how Jesus showed you and I that the creation was made in six days. However, as a non-Christian, it is unlikely that you would find it relevant.
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by Jim Scott
Yes, I know that polonium halos are put forward by an actual scientist and have some logic behind them, thats why I called them questionable (which they are) and not false.
But there are even more experts who disagree with Gentry.
en.wikipedia.org... - references