If he had a long standing job, or any idea of responsability, he would have had insurance from the git-go...
Unbelievable. First you blame the husband for not being responsible enough to hold down a job and maintain insurance coverage.
When that tactic was proven false, you then moved on to this wonderful little nugget of wisdom:
Yes there is minimal coverage, he only needs to keep the coverage that would include her!
Not his childeren"unless they also have pre-existing conditions"
So, by your logic he should only carry the bare minimum of coverage necessary to care for his wife, at the expense of excluding his children. That certainly sounds like the responsible thing to do. Nice try at your attempt to save face.
Its just to keep ppl from raping private small bussiness owners such as myself.
Ah, now we're getting somewhere. It seems your beef is with the issue of health care reform. Because as a small business owner, you're being "raped." (Nice move playing the victim card in the most visually and metaphorically reprehensible way.)
For some odd reason, I'm feeling zero sympathy for your plight.
On the other hand, this man has a gravely ill wife, and a child for which to provide. He's been laid off from his job and is being forced to take a route to provide health coverage for his family by joining the military.
Despite you're original assessment that this man has been less than responsible in meeting the needs of his family, he has proven himself to be nothing short of selfless, noble and honorable.
