It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Iran threatens to invade Pakistan, "crushing response" for US, UK

page: 1
4
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 05:17 PM
link   
SOURCE

Ok things are really starting to heat up... is it just me or does it seem like the stage is being set for a false flag terror event to occur, and then be blamed on Iran?

Now that Iran is coming out making these threats, TPTB could decide to stage another 9/11 type event in the US or UK and then point the finger at Iran, which would then justify attacking their nuclear facilities, and wiping out the revolutionary guards... I'm not saying this is definitly the case, but the timing seems very suspicious.



[edit on 19-10-2009 by Eye On War]




posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 05:21 PM
link   
Or Iran could overstep itself and get nuked by Pakistan. Not everything on this earth is controlled by tptb. Sometimes a idiot has to learn the hard way....



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 05:23 PM
link   
Hmm I'm sceptical of this source. And I doubt Iran would invade Pakistan anyway.

The regime doesn't trust the army, otherwise why would they have instated a 2nd army - the revolutionary guards. And the revolutionary guards are needed for future protests. So no war here!


[edit on 19-10-2009 by john124]



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 05:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by hangedman13
Or Iran could overstep itself and get nuked by Pakistan. Not everything on this earth is controlled by tptb. Sometimes a idiot has to learn the hard way....


you could be right, either way this has the potential to get ugly very quickly...

This is from the end of the article:

'Past Iranian reprisals were usually carried against the US or Britain indirectly in the Persian Gulf or by local Islamic surrogates like Hizballah in Iraq. Jafari's words point to a more direct showdown this time by the IRGC or its terrorist arm al Qods.'



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 05:25 PM
link   
Iran is controlled by england ..

England installed that regime .



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 05:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by john124
Hmm I'm sceptical of this source. And I doubt Iran would invade Pakistan anyway.


Yes well I have heard that Debkafile is run by the Mossad so their is the possibility this is just propaganda for Israel, but on the other hand there have been many stories that they have broken, that have later been confirmed by other mainstream sources.

[edit on 19-10-2009 by Eye On War]



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 05:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by 2kni3
Iran is controlled by england ..

England installed that regime .


Well that would make sense if the puppet masters in the UK want war, and have told Iranian regime to come out openly making threats, so that it would look ok in the public eye when the US/Israel attacks



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 05:30 PM
link   
Your source

Iranian sources report that Tehran will have to make good on its threats without too much delay or lose face among the political and ethnic minority dissidents plaguing on the regime, especially those who rose up in protest against the tainted June 20 presidential election. Hesitation will be seen as weakness.


So if they admit there are dissidents in their ranks then why are they so quick to blame outside agitation? Shouldn't they possibly start by looking in the mirror for the cause?

Just a thought.


[edit on 19-10-2009 by SLAYER69]



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 05:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Eye On War
 


I must be confused. So you think England could control Iran and so they tell them to make threats against the US, Pakistan, and the UK so that if Israel attacks Iran's nuclear facilities it will be better supported.

So why wouldn't the UK cut to the chase and tell Iran to shut down its nuclear facilities if they actually controlled them?

This is nuts!



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 05:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by KissMyBass
reply to post by Eye On War
 


I must be confused. So you think England could control Iran and so they tell them to make threats against the US, Pakistan, and the UK so that if Israel attacks Iran's nuclear facilities it will be better supported.

So why wouldn't the UK cut to the chase and tell Iran to shut down its nuclear facilities if they actually controlled them?

This is nuts!


I didn't say that is the case.... i said 'if'



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 05:45 PM
link   
reply to post by Eye On War
 



Debkafile is run by the Mossad so their is the possibility this is just propaganda for Israel,


Yeah it's probably Israel's wishful thinking then. I doubt Israel seriously think this would happen.



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 06:17 PM
link   
This is it people, the catalyst for the long time coming war with Iran.
Time is up



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 06:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by 2kni3
Iran is controlled by england ..

England installed that regime .


You got it all wrong. England use to control Iran before the revolution when they had the Shah installed.



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 06:31 PM
link   
Threatening to invade Pakistan?

They couldn't even whip Iraq. I just know the Paki's are shaking in their boots. Beside, Pakistan just may nuke their Persian butts if pushed.

Iran supports Hizballah, and other nations support anti-Iranians groups.

Why the animosity?



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 06:32 PM
link   
England does not control Iran, although they have had agents in Iran for a long time.

I personally think Pakistan and Israel are the biggest threats to the world at the moment, I don't care if this rattles a few cages - allow me to explain.

Israel is itching for a war with Iran. They hate each other and both have shown antagonism to the other, yet it's Iran who have been labelled as the 'bad guys' just because they questioned the holocaust yet the US blindly follow Israel in what ever they wish to achieve (except thankfully for the moment the US has given Israel the no-no in regards to bombing Iran). Which up to now can be seen as a step towards maturity.

Pakistan has been distabilised by Al-Queda (or engineered to be as such) and now the Pakistan Military is striving to regain control of key areas. Also western Al-Queda (home grown westerners) are training in Pakistan and returning to their places of residence.

My guessing is:

A terrorist attack is commited in the western world and it will be identified with either Pakistan or Iran (with Israeli involvement) and we will attack one of them.

Sad really, i rather like my life at the moment.



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 06:33 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 07:05 PM
link   
Actually, militarily, Dooper has a real point. Pakistan has some crack troops. They've been used by the UN many, many times. They are well prepared. Iran did have more than a lot of trouble with the Iraqis and if Saddam was a better military strategist the Iranians may very well have lost.



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 07:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by really
Actually, militarily, Dooper has a real point. Pakistan has some crack troops. They've been used by the UN many, many times. They are well prepared. Iran did have more than a lot of trouble with the Iraqis and if Saddam was a better military strategist the Iranians may very well have lost.


I was of course referring to his childish language and attitude and not of the content of his post.

Pakistan does have some crack troops, but so does Iran, so does anywhere....

That's an irrelevant point to be honest.

The Uk has THE BEST soldiers on the planet in regards to the SBS and SAS. But that's irrelevant.

Iraq didn't really engage in a war with Iran, instead they used chemical weapons on the fringe or Iran. BIG DIFFERENCE.

[edit on 19-10-2009 by mr-lizard]



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 07:14 PM
link   
reply to post by Echelon117
 


Time is up, great quote that from my fav movie.

All I can say is about bloody time too, it's been in the making for years, just get on with it, I've just paid extra on my SKY TV to get Fox News, yeah!



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 07:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by mr-lizard

Iraq didn't really engage in a war with Iran, instead they used chemical weapons on the fringe or Iran. BIG DIFFERENCE.

[edit on 19-10-2009 by mr-lizard]

Actually, Iraq invaded Iran. Iran's soldiers weren't cutting it and the Ayatollah started using children, sending them in droves to the front lines, to overwhelm the Iraqis. I forget the name they gave to the children.
There is now a fountain in Tehran (I believe Tehran, might be another part of Iran) to commemorate these children. The water comes out red so as to look like blood.

www.matthiaskuentzel.de...

[edit on 19-10-2009 by really]



new topics

top topics



 
4
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join