It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lichter daraus
one question. What is the white dot on the building just in front of the airplane?
www.freedomdomain.com...
Originally posted by Lichter daraus
I also read a post with the theory that it was a laser guided plane/missile whatever you wanna call it. It had a video posted with it showing the dot moving along the building right up til the plane hit. I don't know though.
[edit on 07/16/2009 by Lichter daraus]
Originally posted by grrrrt
I'm not saying he is wrong or anything, but he is trying to prove his point with his mouse cursor.
Originally posted by nwodeath
A while back someone posted a thread on here asking people to debunk this page, but I never saw any responses to it, and then it disappeared from the site.
I found this page recently and I was wondering if the No Plane debunkers could try to rip this apart piece by piece.
If you don't believe the No Planer campaign, then do everyone a favor, and instead of arguing, just take each piece mentioned and break it down and expose it for the truth, if you can.
www.freedomdomain.com...
Originally posted by jprophet420
Originally posted by nwodeath
Dude, let me break it to you easy. I watched the news live on 911. There was no cgi. theres no cgi on the news archives on the top of the page. So if theres any cgi done its post 911. September clues videos are edited. Deal with it.
Dude, you are wrong! Deal with it! - What you saw "live" not NOT live. It was made beforehand and shown to us like a TV show. How hard is that to comprehend?
Look at the evidence on the page cited. If you cannot refute it, then take a walk!
[edit on 19-10-2009 by nwodeath]
Originally posted by nwodeath
A while back someone posted a thread on here asking people to debunk this page...
Also, aluminum, does not penetrate steel. No matter what anyone says to mislead you. It's a lie. Steel would deflect aluminum upon impact no matter how fast the plane is traveling...Aluminum will not and cannot penetrate steel like it was shown to on the videos, and the government and 911 truthers claim. The law of the universe cannot be bent to suite this one occasion in history.
Originally posted by trebor451
Originally posted by nwodeath
A while back someone posted a thread on here asking people to debunk this page...
Debunk what? Right off the bat the guy who did that page is up idiot creek without a paddle.
Take his comment:
Also, aluminum, does not penetrate steel. No matter what anyone says to mislead you. It's a lie. Steel would deflect aluminum upon impact no matter how fast the plane is traveling...Aluminum will not and cannot penetrate steel like it was shown to on the videos, and the government and 911 truthers claim. The law of the universe cannot be bent to suite this one occasion in history.
What did the plane have to penetrate? Well, first off, glass. A bunch of it. What was holding that glass? A bunch of steel spandrels that were linked together to form the outer support structure of the building. How big or thick were these spandrels? Approximately 3/8” with a box depth of approximately 1’ 2” - forming a 14” square box. These outer wall spandrels were connected together with 4 bolts and welding. (both this data comes from FEMA’s WTC Steel Data Collection, page D-5).
What was slamming into those 14" square boxes and windows? A Boeing 767 weighing in at over 100 tons traveling at around 750 feet per second.
Anyone who says that a 14" square box-beam support structure with a 36" wide strengthened-glass window will stop - no, will deflect - a 100 ton body moving at 750 feet per second is without a brain.
The aforementioned facts render *anything* else in that webpage null and void...and debunked.
[edit on 19-10-2009 by trebor451]
Originally posted by nwodeath
You wasted a lot of space. Nothing more, and your post was worthless.
Originally posted by Lichter daraus
one question. What is the white dot on the building just in front of the airplane?
Originally posted by jprophet420
I already have refuted it. I said that I watched it live and there was no cgi then.
No plane impact reaction on the face of the building......besides the aluminum penetrating steel, which is impossible.
Originally posted by thedman
Seems back in WWII - 60 years before Sept 11 aluminium airplanes could penetrate side of steel ships