It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Chemtrail proof! 1990 US Air Force document!

page: 8
51
<< 5  6  7    9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 10:20 PM
link   
reply to post by exposethosesecrets
 


You're forgetting the barium laced dust particles could get picked up by the wind, therefore making it airborne.

Or it could evaporate out of the tailings dams.




posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 10:25 PM
link   
reply to post by OzWeatherman
 



Ok to reply to a couple of posts.

1-does anyone know how a turbine engine produces thrust? If talking about an axial flow turbine-the intake vanes increase the pressure of the intake air and directs it to an area that has combustion canisters that inject the fuel at a given ratio. Next that increased temp/pressure is directed across turbine blades that redirect that energy to the exhaust and also to the intake of air(almost the same concept of a rocket-except a rocket does not intake anything). You get thrust from the increase in energy from the intake to the outflow. Thrust equaling the difference of the intake energy to the outflow.

2-adding additives to fuel does not mean anything will be destroyed! C'mon if you think 100% of fuel is used during the detonation cycle of any type engine you are very much mistaken. In car engines for example, only 50-60% of fuel is actually used for combustion and another 20-25% is used for a cooling effect of the chamber. The recycling of vapors is a normal use of canisters in the engine compartment and the catalytic converter is used to supposedly capture the rest of the harmful vapors.

3-upper and lower air levels. At altitudes that normal large body jets fly the atmospheric conditions are all the same. Temp and humidity. At 35,000 ft the temperature is -50F and I have tryed to research the humidity but keep coming up empty. Maybe Oz can help.

4-cloud seeding has been done since the 1950's and the last 60 years their has been no advance in any science since than!!!!!!!!!! /s

5-in regards to debunking anything the government does, do you actually believe in anything that comes out of your own mouth. You have proven that the government has not tried to manipulate weather? C'mon have you investigated the moving of the jetstream by large amounts of aircraft? Or is this a fallacy on my part? I will give you numerous links to data from the AF myself if you deny this.

6-do not really care if you have 2,000,000 mechanics and infinite number of pilots because they have no idea of the chemical makeup of the fuel they burn. Because they look at the color of the FRACKING fuel they use does not mean they have any idea of whats in it! My God if you rationally think about your own excuses you will see that it is not a reputable response.

7-HAARP is not off subject-unless of course you can explain to all us idiots about the purpose behind it. Of course you can speculate like the rest of us and make educated guesses, but I guess that would be the same fracking # you are doing now!

edit for gramma

[edit on 10/19/2009 by endisnighe]



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 10:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by dragonridr
 


Don't forget that the town is smack bang in the middle of a widespread oil field and Barium a component in the drilling process.

I believe I've tried to point that fact out to Chembreather several times, I even went to the trouble of finding maps of the area showing all the wells.

www.abovetopsecret.com...


But nope, ignorance reigns supreme.



[edit on 19/10/09 by Chadwickus]


Well the air seems pretty good there if the Barium level was .0688 so even with the oil fields there well below EPA standards.What i cant believe is no one called the news station to explain how to convert ug/l to ppm.My god you think someone would have noticed instead they put some rube on the news who puts jars on his pickup truck!Then spends money to send it to a lab calls the news.The news caster is to stupid to know how to convert it says wow thats above EPA standards then airs a false report.

The other funny thing is people are using this as proof that chem trails have dangerous amounts of Barium all because an idiot with jars on a pickup and a stupid newscaster.I guess science is so dumbed down in schools that were in serious trouble.



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 10:28 PM
link   




Do you really believe the EPA?

These levels are dangerous to humans. Period.



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 10:47 PM
link   
reply to post by exposethosesecrets
 


Barium is surprisingly abundant in the Earth's crust, being the 14th most abundant element. High amounts of barium may only be found in soils and in food, such as nuts, seaweed, fish and certain plants.Barium is often used in barium-nickel alloys for spark-plug electrodes an in vacuum tubes as drying and oxygen-removing agent. It is also used in fluorescent lamps: impure barium sulfide phosphoresces after exposure to the light.
Barium compounds are used by the oil and gas industries to make drilling mud. Drilling mud simplifies drilling through rocks by lubricating the drill.
Barium compounds are also used to make paint, bricks, tiles, glass, and rubber. Barium nitrate and clorate give fireworks a green colour.

If its so dangerous my god the earths trying to kill us.That does it now I'm ticked i guess ill just go make more co2 to get her back!!!!


Sorry i really couldn't resist i tried oh how i tried.



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 10:55 PM
link   
The "global warming" theory that is popular amongst the politicians who control the world, was supposedly caused by the buildup of CO2 in the atmosphere. Which alledgedly traps the heat in. Maybe that is the cover story for the depletion of the ozone layer by repeated punctures by spacrcraft launches. I read that the final Saturn V booster was used to put Skylab into a very high orbit, which, reportedly, allowed the ozone to escape through the hole punched through the ozone layer. The ozone was gone, reportedly, for around 24 hours. The fears of ozone loss were not enough to keep the mad scientists from continuing the destruction of the Earth's atmosphere just ass fast as they could launch vehicles into space. An added byproduct is the millions of tons of deadly propellant exhausted into the atmosphere during every launch. So, ozone depletion equals severe radiation effects on human skin, causing epidemic of skin cancer. Cure, deposit chemicals "believed" to be able to block the radiation??? Zat is de qvestion!



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 11:03 PM
link   
reply to post by exposethosesecrets
 


debunker? You still have no proof (in hand) that could be used to show probable cause and to file a legal complaint for indictment. You have nothing but words. And there is a good reason for that....because chemtrails are not what you think. I posted this once here, and will try again to show you that it is darn near impossible (physically) to create a "halo" of contaminants that would cause adverse effects in humans.

Take 500 cities. Assume they are being "sprayed" with a chemical...say barium.
Now say they spray each city by 100 square miles. (I realize this is an under estimation based on the prevalence of these vapor trails seen across the world). Therefore, my estimate will be conservative, and not worst case.

OK...now assume the planes are flying at a height of 3 miles. That's 300 cubic miles of potentially affected air space (by your so-called toxic chemical) per city.

300 cubic miles times 500 cities equals 150,000 cubic miles.

150,000 cubic miles = 6.3E+14 cubic meters.

Assume the "toxic" long term exposure level to barium through the inhalation route is 1 mg/m3.

www.atsdr.cdc.gov...

1 mg/m3 x 6.3E+14 cubic meters = 6.3E+14 mg

6.3E+14 mg x 2.2E-06 lbs./mg = 1.4E+09 pounds

or 700,000 TONS of Barium

Annual production of barium is 6,000,000 tons/year
environmentalchemistry.com...

The chemical spraying of barium on 500 cities would utilize 10% of the annual production. That's a lot of barium folks. And when considering that chemtrails are seen around the world, you can incorporate at least 5000 major cities that are being "sprayed". If that were true, then there would be very little barium available for other uses, or we would see a phenomenally large increase in the price of barium (supply and demand).

Assuming 5000 cities, and 100 square miles...the total is 500,000 square miles. The total earth surface is 197,000,000 square miles. That's roughly 0.3% of the total surface area being sprayed. Not much at all.
www.blueplanetbiomes.org...

This is just a quick "back of the envelope" calculation to help those understand the magnitude of this operation if it exists. I doubt it seriously.

I do believe that it is largely water vapor that has crystallized. And I hypothesize that it is being done for a reason, above and beyond what is released from normal air travel. The skies are being made opaque for a reason. Maybe some form of weather control. Who knows. Who cares. Regardless of what they say...the truth will not set you free. Sorry.

I have provided more accurate calcs in other forums, but they are ignored because many in todays world cannot live without sensationalism.



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 11:23 PM
link   
I have a PDF file here called "Global warming and Ice ages-Prospects for Physics-Based Modulation of Global Change" written by Edward Teller and two other guys. Not sure of the site i originally got it. How do i post it? I tried copy and paste but the format is all ugly lookin....

[edit on 19-10-2009 by samh69]



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 11:26 PM
link   
reply to post by samh69
 


You can upload PDF's to your media page.

media.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 11:41 PM
link   
www.holmestead.ca...

pdf by teller down the bottom


en.wikipedia.org...

kinda lol that its all on wiki, there not chemtrails, dont be silly, there "Stratospheric sulfate aerosols " , there much friendlier name lol



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 11:48 PM
link   
orbisvitae.com...

tons of chemtrail info



posted on Oct, 19 2009 @ 11:58 PM
link   
reply to post by OzWeatherman
 


I took a few pictures end of 2008 in Los Angeles. One is attached here.
At that time these, what you call "contrails" only formed and were visible on Mondays and Wednesdays; rest of the week typical blue sky and sun. Now, that's a quite interesting weather phenomenon, don't you think? Or might it be that it has to do with a flight schedule?
You also mentioned that they don't form in the middle east because of the dry weather. Well, have you ever been in Southern California? The whole place burns twice a year because it's so dry there.
And believe me, chemtrails are not very rare in that area.

You deny chemtrails, fair enough, you are the weatherman and expert. However, I would like to know what kind of weather pattern that is that makes contrails only visible on the two same days of the week???




posted on Oct, 20 2009 @ 12:27 AM
link   
reply to post by allclear
 

Yada yada yada yada yada . . .

Those numbers are useless.

What if what IS in the chemtrails,
are experimental viruses/bacterias ???

You don't need tons of them to "get" the subjects, right ??
All clever people KNOW that ! !

And, OP and other chemtrails observers: F & S S S S S. . . B-)

Blue skies.



posted on Oct, 20 2009 @ 12:45 AM
link   
reply to post by thegreatobserver
 


To be honest, I would have to analyse the data. Next time you observe this phenomenen, either post in on my thread or let me know so I can examine the weather patterns


By the way nice image, as well as the donut on a rope contrail u also have a hole punch cloud in the cirrus formed by the plane flying through the layer

Edit to add.

Also the middle east and California are two completely different climates. California is a coastal state affected by cold fronts and moist air, while th middle east is part of a dryer, warmer climate

[edit on 20/10/2009 by OzWeatherman]



posted on Oct, 20 2009 @ 12:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by endisnighe
reply to post by OzWeatherman
 

Ok to reply to a couple of posts.
3-upper and lower air levels. At altitudes that normal large body jets fly the atmospheric conditions are all the same. Temp and humidity. At 35,000 ft the temperature is -50F and I have tryed to research the humidity but keep coming up empty. Maybe Oz can help.


Do you mean that the atmospheric conditions are completely the same across the globe at the same pressure levels? I can guarantee they arent...and if you doubt this I will provide the proof



4-cloud seeding has been done since the 1950's and the last 60 years their has been no advance in any science since than!!!!!!!!!!


Correct, but recently cloud seeding has been more succesful.



5-in regards to debunking anything the government does, do you actually believe in anything that comes out of your own mouth. You have proven that the government has not tried to manipulate weather? C'mon have you investigated the moving of the jetstream by large amounts of aircraft? Or is this a fallacy on my part? I will give you numerous links to data from the AF myself if you deny this.


Well we do forecast the jetstream so yeah....



6-do not really care if you have 2,000,000 mechanics and infinite number of pilots because they have no idea of the chemical makeup of the fuel they burn. Because they look at the color of the FRACKING fuel they use does not mean they have any idea of whats in it! My God if you rationally think about your own excuses you will see that it is not a reputable response.


But you do?



7-HAARP is not off subject-unless of course you can explain to all us idiots about the purpose behind it. Of course you can speculate like the rest of us and make educated guesses, but I guess that would be the same fracking # you are doing now!


Actually know, my research thread has proven...yes proven that contrails will form under the set condition, so its not speculation its data. Both sides of the argument have provided the data so its hardly unbiased to.

And if the topic of the thread was weather mod HAARP would be fine, but its about chemtrails and stuff.



posted on Oct, 20 2009 @ 01:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by ChemBreather
 


Then how come south america has less chemtrailing?

or why in the middle east there arent any chemtrails?



I dont know if there are more or less chemtrailing in s.america.
I know they spray alot here at times..

There are chemtrail youtubes from alot of contries around the world...



posted on Oct, 20 2009 @ 01:02 AM
link   
I appreciate your research Exposethosesecrets. I work in Santa Fe where the NM State Library is located and I would be happy to get hard copies of the micro fieche. I will likely have time to do it tomorrow the 20 th. To avoid confusion would you post again specifically what it is you want located and copied. Again, good work!



posted on Oct, 20 2009 @ 01:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by exposethosesecrets
 


ATS is not a place for what have already been shown to be naturally occuring contrails, it is shown over and over again here.

Continuing to post threads on subjects that have a "hoax" nature to them belongs either in a HOAX forum, or not at all.


(snip), dont act like you guys on ATS debunked chemtrails, ok. I see them spray all the time, so your boss may have told a small lie to keep you spreading mainstream teachings on clouds and warm and cold weather. I think we at ATS have learned that these people in science really dont know too much about any thing, right ??


[edit on 20/10/2009 by ChemBreather]

[edit on 20-10-2009 by asala]



posted on Oct, 20 2009 @ 01:54 AM
link   
In regards to the ecosystem weapon's well I am not surprised, recently with a trip to Beijing, China I was advised by a government official that on the 17th October which was fore casted to be foggy and unclear as it was witnessed on the 16th the government used exotic weapons by the air-force to clear the sky of the Beijing in order for the 60th Military parade to go on display.

The 60th military anniversary was an important date to Chinese in order to show the world their new military strength, yet I am not that surprised of their capabilities.

The weapons used by the air-force and other methods was not classified to me, all I could say is what I have heard and I sure was surprised to see an extremely bright day as opposed to an enormously foggy day 6-12 hours prior. My flight that landed on the 16th on the Beijing airport literally had 1-5% of vision, all the work was done by an auto-pilot and control center to align the aircraft landing through the fog.



posted on Oct, 20 2009 @ 02:04 AM
link   
I want to run something by you guys.

Remember after 911, they did not allow any planes in the sky?

Well I noticed that for the first time in my life I saw a clear sky and the air was so wonderful.

This is the first time I have ever seen this happen,
Anyone else notice this?



new topics

top topics



 
51
<< 5  6  7    9  10 >>

log in

join