Originally posted by Orion7911
you still have yet to answer Tezz's post
[snip]
and the rest of reweys questions/challenges to you
Such as?
He has an opinion that the roughly horizontal slash in the OP photo was because the plane was traveling left to right, and, if I understand him
correctly, the fuselage/nose was the part of the plane responsible for making that gouge. He provides zero logical reasoning behind his opinion - he
doesn't base it on anything other than his opinion that he is right. Just like he did in the first thread when he went on for several posts arguing
that the crater was 50' wide. There's a pattern there of delusional thinking.
My opinion is that the wings made it, since there are no other wing marks there.
So what is there to discuss? In order to make an argument against the fuselage making the gouge, I'd have to search through the entire NTSB database
to try and find the report. I'm not interested in that.
It's not worth the time arguing against someone's opinion when they don't provide any reason behind it that can be viewed unbiasedly.
The rational realize this.
Troofers will not be moved by it.
The heroes on Fl 93 figured out what was going on in minutes. 9/11 dolts have had 8 yrs and still can't figure it out. The sad thing is, in 8 yrs, a
troofer could have gone to college, gotten a degree in aeronautical engineering, moved into flight crash investigations, built up personal experience
on the subject matter, and then written a paper that refutes the "os" by now.
That just proves what kind of losers are in the TM.
Personal attack removed
[edit on 20/10/09 by masqua]
