It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We can get into a circular argument about who started the fight, but in the end the US is no more right than the terrorists, they are just more powerful so what they says is automatically (supoosedly) legitimate.
Originally posted by curme
[What part did Hussein have in 9/11? Didn't Bush say Husssein had nothing to do with it?
Curme, if Bush said Hussein had nothing to do with it, I didn't hear it. Were he to have said that I am quite sure I would have had some problems with him being included in the war on terror.
Here are a couple things I do remember:
Sometime last year they found papers in the Iraqi intelligence building connecting Hussein to Al Quada. Something about an aide to Osama meeting with Hussein or his representatives for several days, and leaving after having built a good relationship. This, by the way, was sometime in 1998 that they got together.
A couple of foreign intelligence agencies clued us in on the fact that Hussein and Osama were linked, that Iraqi intelligence had met with one of the terrorists that was personally involved in the plane attacks. They met in a city in Europe, although I don't remember which.
As far as weapons, biological weapons samples were found at a scientist's house, equipment for making and testing biological/chemical weapons as well as research on an hemorrhagic (sp?) fever was also found, according to David Kay, and this was noted in his report.
There have been more things than this come out, but I can't remember everything, now can I? Still, this is more than enough.
Originally posted by specialasianX
There is no evidence that any terror groups have any WMD's and there is little to no chance they will take over the world.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Bad intelligence? We all know for a fact that Hussein had chemical/biological weapons (Why do you call them WMD's, because they are not.). We also know that he played cat and mouse games with inspectors for months, making a mockery of the inspection process. And we also know that Bush made no secret what his intentions were, giving the enemies plenty of time to relocate the special weapons.
The amazing thing is not the "RW organs", but the "LW denials".
Originally posted by Variable
Now that Bush and Company have been proven right on WMD in Iraq why are we not hearing more apologies? The whole drum beat of the left has been "The war was a lie! There were no WMD!" Now that you lefties are wiping the egg off your faces can you see the truth yet? Do you still believe that there is no WMD? Is thy head still stuck in the sand?
A massive chunk of your argument is now gone **poof**
Come now Colonel, where is the "mea culpa, mea culpa?"