White House admits: We 'control' news media, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 14 times
Topic started on 18-10-2009 @ 08:40 PM by Stormdancer777
www.wnd.com...

Anita Dunn disclosed to the Dominican government at a videotaped conference.

"Very rarely did we communicate
through the press anything that we didn't absolutely control," said Dunn,


"One of the reasons we did so many of the David Plouffe videos was not just for our supporters, but also because it was a way for us to get our message out without having to actually talk to reporters," said Dunn, referring to Plouffe, who was Obama's chief campaign manager.


Continued Dunn: "Whether it was a David Plouffe video or an Obama speech, a huge part of our press strategy was focused on making the media cover what Obama was actually saying as opposed to why the campaign was saying it, what the tactic was. … Making the press cover what we were saying."


Who now seems to be in control of her involuntary tongue movements.

And that's the truth,


www.youtube.com...






[edit on 083131p://bSunday2009 by Stormdancer777]

[edit on 093131p://bSunday2009 by Stormdancer777]


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 08:42 PM by tothetenthpower
reply to post by Stormdancer777



This is from world news daily...you've been hoaxed.


Anybody who writes.." reptilian", come on now..

Edit: I HAVE BEEN DUPPED!! See Below .

~Keeper

[edit on 10/18/2009 by tothetenthpower]


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 08:44 PM by Stormdancer777
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to
post by Stormdancer777



This is from world news daily...you've been hoaxed.


Anybody who writes.." reptilian", come on now..

~Keeper


I added that LOLOLOL

Keeping you guys on your toes.

NOw watch the video, she said it.



reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 08:46 PM by tothetenthpower
reply to post by Stormdancer777



My apologies, I looked at the site and it is credible. I was thinking about the more ridiculous one, but I can't remember the name right now.

Yeah so this story is a little scary.

~Keeper


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 08:48 PM by Stormdancer777
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to
post by Stormdancer777



My apologies, I looked at the site and it is credible. I was thinking about the more ridiculous one, but I can't remember the name right now.

Yeah so this story is a little scary.

~Keeper


That's OK, perhaps, I should not have added it, the topic is important.

Gotta have a little fun around here, I guess.


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 09:00 PM by clay2 baraka
This has been going on for years from Democratic to Republican administrations:

Controlling the message

"The Bush administration has perfected the art of tightly controlling information. And it has paid no price for its disciplined, on-message, my-way-or-the-highway approach. The press might want to get used to it--this may be the template for future presidencies," Lori Robertson wrote in the March/April 2005 American Journalism Review.

"This White House has gone beyond mastering damage control to making pre-emptive strikes that distort unfavorable information or keep it hidden from public view."—Editorial, Roanoke Times, August 9, 2003.
The Technique

Controlling the message can be accomplished through various means, including setting the agenda: "telling the truth and answering questions before they were asked, prepared statements and designated subject matter experts as spokespersons, and getting key messages out early to gain the media's trust."

The "public relations professional is in charge of controlling the message," according to Ingrid Cummings of Rubicon Communications. "It is critical to develop a set of key message points: simple declarations of fact relevant to the fact pattern. Once they have developed key message points, professionals practice them and keep delivering them succinctly and repeatedly in response to media inquiries."


The fact is that any group in politics that is unable to get ahead of an issue before throwing out there for the media wolves will not be a group with relevance for very long.

Nice alarmist article though. .
www.sourcewatch.org...


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 09:03 PM by Stormdancer777
reply to post by clay2 baraka





Nice alarmist article though


Your welcome,


The sad thing is I would be willing to bet most people don't realize it, the amount of media control, that is.


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 09:05 PM by clay2 baraka
reply to post by Stormdancer777



I absolutely agree with you there!
Unfortunately our media and political systems mirror our dysfunctional society.



reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 09:08 PM by Stormdancer777
Originally posted by clay2 baraka
reply to
post by Stormdancer777



I absolutely agree with you there!
Unfortunately our media and political systems mirror our dysfunctional society.


Yes, I am always surprised how little my friends want to hear.


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 09:17 PM by Stormdancer777
reply to post by Aziroth


People "proved" that youtube was yanking articles off pertaining to certain recent political or social events.

Not only youtube.


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 09:30 PM by Aziroth
reply to post by Stormdancer777



Right, its every website, I have read articles about webmasters yanking articles off this website that were too controversial. The whole system is slanted, its all controlled, they allow things that draw the attention of the public towards sketchy subversive things just to ensure that they stay occupied on something that has no bearing on their plans, the plans themselves are subverted in trickery just to send off the masses. The only way to ever stop the cycle is to leave the comforts of home and physically stop these people, but there's no recruiting people for that cause specially not on here...hmm I wonder why that rule exists...im sure something like to keep ATS nonpartisan, to protect the viewers from discrimination, what silly reasons reminds me of the government saying we dont want you watching or seeing what we dont want you to see or watch so you cant conform to a single group and stop us...sorry im just going deeper and deeper into this, what a tumble hole you can get yourself into, its not like this article started by declaring absolute media control or anything...


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 09:36 PM by Stormdancer777
www.chron.com...

Perhaps the WH,is now going to try and pacify Fox, with honey.

White House vows to play nice with Fox News

WASHINGTON — White House advisers pledged on Sunday to book administration officials on Fox News despite claims by the president's inner circle that the cable network is a GOP mouthpiece whose programming “is geared toward making money.”

Last week, White House communications director Anita Dunn said Fox News operates “almost as either the research arm or the communications arm of the Republican Party.” On Sunday, Rahm Emanuel, President Barack Obama's chief of staff, said, “It is not a news organization so much as it has a perspective.”

In response to the criticism, Fox News executive Michael Clemente on Sunday accused the White House of continuing to “declare war on a news organization” rather than focusing on issues such as jobs and health care.

“The door remains open and we welcome a discussion about the facts behind the issues,” Clemente, senior vice president of news, said in a written statement.


Will they be able to buy off FOX?
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Alaska: Samantha Koenig Kidnapped last week.
  Posted 2 days ago with 111 member flags
Blue Spheres Fall from the Sky in the UK
  Posted 15 days ago with 81 member flags
The Chinese have seen the dragon in the sky !!
  Posted 2 days ago with 68 member flags
Strange Sounds in Sky Explained by Scientists
  Posted 11 days ago with 59 member flags
She Dialed 911. The Cop Who Came to Help Raped Her.
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags
Anonymous: Revealing The Arcane Legal Trick Behind ACTA
  Posted 12 days ago with 42 member flags
Anonymous reveals Haditha massacre emails | RT
  Posted 7 days ago with 33 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 16 hours ago, 68 replies
Official Maine Caucus Results Thread!!
  2012 US Elections, Posted 6 hours ago, 55 replies