It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Photos Of Nibiru From Across The World!!

page: 13
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in


posted on Oct, 24 2009 @ 01:45 PM
reply to post by erasedhistory

I barely know how to use my digital camera and I have used that as an excuse not to try and take a picture myself....and honestly...I don't think I really want to know for sure.

posted on Oct, 24 2009 @ 03:29 PM
As an amateur astronomer, also astrologer, and open to conspiracy theories, I have never seen any proof of Niribu, ever.

Yes, there are some cycle of disasters on Earth, that would happen again somewhere between now and 2200. But, that does not mean it is really a periodical event, or a companion star or rogue planet.
And yes there are some current anomalies with Earth changes, but again that does not mean it is a rogue planet.

I never seen any clear evidence of Niribu.
It's plain stupid to show photos of camera lens effect of the Sun, or orbs, or refraction effects in the sky at sunset, as Niribu.
Those are FAKES.

I remain open to the possibility of a yet too far Niribu that could arrive in the next decades. But, surely it's not observed yet with naked eye or small telescopes.

reply to post by Lichter daraus

posted on Oct, 24 2009 @ 04:50 PM
Whoever posted that link to orgonites or whatever is... well... lol. Have you looked at that scam website? ROFL - spend hundreds of dollars on scrap metal and smelt it into a rock... yay.

posted on Oct, 24 2009 @ 05:50 PM
reply to post by SolPower

It was me. That was one of Sherry Shriner's many websites. She has a way of seeing things and her websites can be quite entertaining.

posted on Oct, 25 2009 @ 03:19 AM
reply to post by MissSmartypants

you nailed it - she's indeed... interesting ;p

posted on Oct, 26 2009 @ 07:53 AM

Originally posted by djusdjus
Hate to be the party pooper but...

In each of those videos what we are seeing is:

a) Lens flares from pointing the camera at the sun

b) Internal lens reflection because of the way the lens was ground.

c) double glazed windows with offset reflection

People are seeing stuff, but it certainly isn't a large planet approaching us.
Or a nemesis star, or ...well anything for that matter.


Sitchin has been debunked for quite a while now, and thoroughly so. It behooves anyone to take a look at what language specialists are having to say about his "work" on cuneiform. You will be surprised at how little he actually does know. It hasn't stopped him from taking peoples money for his fictional works though.

there are literally thousands upon thousands of amateur astronomers who would be capable of seeing this, and yet, we are looking at youtube videos?

This is lazy minded people. And tiresome, but if you want to whip yourself into a frenzy of fear over something that isn't going to happen, by all means! It seems to be a trendy thing to do here. lol

Whoah there, Sparky.

I agree with most of your post.

Also to note, I am on the fence about all this Nibiru/Annunaki stuff, but also believe that all of these (particular) vids/pics are bogus.

But let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater, here - Rather than saying that Sitchin has been "thoroughly debunked", a more accurate statement might be 'many of Sitchin's claims have come under stark controversy, and some have even been outright disproven' - and, I could agree with that - Let's not belittle the contributions that have been made, even thru the debunking of his works. Not only that, but his work HAS been picked up by others who have made drastic departures from his original body(s) of work to continue the (re)search.

Also, when you consider the work that others (i.e. Von Daniken) have done, it does lend just a little credence to the 'periodic visits from extraterrestrials' theory.

Anyway, besides that, sound post.

[edit on 10/26/2009 for grammar spelling by SquirrelNutz]

[edit on 10/26/2009 by SquirrelNutz]

posted on Oct, 27 2009 @ 08:51 AM
why do these pictures have to be nibiru? why does anything unexplained have to be connected to 2012 or doomsday

posted on Oct, 27 2009 @ 09:37 AM
reply to post by Silicis n Volvo

A valid question.

Matter of fact, I think all these quick-to-claim-posts only weaken the argument (since most can be explained)

posted on Oct, 27 2009 @ 09:51 AM

Originally posted by segurelha
It's plain stupid to show photos of camera lens effect of the Sun, or orbs, or refraction effects in the sky at sunset, as Niribu.

Amen to that!

It's amazing that the thread survived for so long, while it has been based on typical artifacts in the camcoder lens.

I suggest everybody gets out at sunset and takes a few shots of the sun, you'll see crazy stuff -- be careful though to not damage the camera or your eyes!

posted on Oct, 27 2009 @ 10:11 AM
Threads like this last so long because one guy says something, and then 100 people rush in trying to sound intelligent and being sarcastic.

You can't complain about people making these threads when after they're made 20 people make posts about it being Sundogs. Just shut up and let it die if you don't like it.

posted on Oct, 27 2009 @ 04:27 PM
Wow, all I can say is sun spots? The last one is the best, it was taken with a cell phone...The idea that these clips prove anything ,except that people are out there taking really bad videos with their cell phones, is a bit farfetched. The truth is that these could be fake. They possibly are sun spots in the videos. Not to mention that there are other planets going around our sun, Mercury is between the Earth and the Sun and it can be argued that the other "object" seen is actually the planet Mercury and not at all the mysterious Niburu. Finally, if these were real, do we all really think that these clips would still be available online? Don't you think that the government would have taken them down by now? They certainly have the power to do so and the history of such actions. No I think that these are simply bad videos and are not at all real proof of Niburu. Just a quick note...there are plenty of observatory's out there that would be able to see these things and would be saying something, and it people are getting this with cell phone pics then they would certainly be seeing it too.

posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 10:34 AM
All the images you see of the object next to the sun are not of a planet. The object is actually a planet sized computer. The planets whole purpose is to save the memories and conscience of the people here on earth. It’s the secret to immortality. You see the earth is a storage bank for memories also. The difference is that the earth is like analog and the new planet is digital. Everyone here is actually up there. Many centuries ago a man saw that we would run out of room here on earth. So, he started working on plans to build a super computer.
He designed this super computer to hold the memories of all mankind. Without this supercomputer we would lose our memories every time we die. With the new computer, we will be able to keep going forever. Granted they are still having some trouble with the programming. For example: The earth would be like a mac, and the new supercomputer is like a pc. Windows has glitches. We have all been digitized for more than fifteen years this time. You see we are on an endless cycle. We go from flesh on the surface, to digital thoughts in the sky, to flesh inside the ground where we work our way to the surface again. All of this was created by one man.
He is not a GOD but rather a scientist working on a theory. You see the same thing is happening in his reality. He started this cycle to prove that man can exist forever and that there is a way to save his planet. His experiment was meant to prove that it’s not only possible for all of life to be nothing more than an experiment. But, also to prove that there is a way to continue life indefinitely. The problem is that in order for his experiment to work he had to get it, to the same point of time and technology as his. In order to do this he had to transfer his mind and memories into the analog computer. Now he is stuck in the same cycle unable to return.
This man has been here stuck in our cycle since its conception. He left his life to create life. Now he can’t return home. Even though he knows that it’s all just an experiment he is still stuck. He has grown tired. He did make it home once but realized that because man here has been taking his memories out of the storage banks on the analog earth they mad it so he could not retrieve them upon returning home to his life. He is unable to think. Unless man puts everything back where it belongs in precise order he will never return home. Now that man here has learned all of his technology he has been shunned.
You see he still walks the earth here today. Stuck and unable to think clearly, he lives a very poor life. When he tried to make noise, the Government shut him away. They have since let him out but he is still living as far below the poverty level as the Government can get him. They have been attempting to get him to take his own life. They do not want to take his life again like they did the last time.
He just wants to go home.


If you go to a quiet place you can hear the sound of the mainframe.

[edit on 28-10-2009 by erasedhistory]

posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 10:38 AM
reply to post by erasedhistory

i haven't laughed so hard in a very long time. be careful not to tell too many people or youll create another Scientology religion.

i am physically hurting from laughing. where do you come up with this?

posted on Oct, 29 2009 @ 08:55 PM
I mentioned earlier that I think these pics are bogus, but I will give you Nibiruers (term?) the following argument(s)...

1) Supression of information is a factor to be considered for sure - it is rumored that in one way or another, The Vatican, NSA or other secretive governing body is heavily involved in both the ownership and/or filtering of data from the majority of the major telescopes, regardless as to whether publicly or privately owned - and it's not just limited to Nibiru. There are other 'projects' that complain regularly that "the data IS there, but not being released" (moon base advocates, for example)

*Having said that, you can understand the desparation of Nibiru supporters to jump on any chance they can for pictures, since they are so hard to come by.

2) Last year, right about the time when (the numbers say) people shouldve been complaining that 'if Nibiru were coming, we would see it by now' there was a massive disinformation campaign launched against supporters who were supposedly providing solid evidence that it was in fact on the way. I'm still not sure I buy this whole theory anyway - only suspiscious thing I've ever read about this, [other than THIS bullet] is #3, below, but you have to ask the question: why would someone go to the trouble of disproving a theory considered too wild all by itself, to begin with?! And, the people who launched this campagin had a LOT of access, and a LOT of know-how - and likely had a team of hackers working in total concert as they took over accounts and shutdown others (?) - why all the effort?! I'll see if I can find the YouTube vid about it - I seem to remember the name Nibiru Shock(?) or something, if someone wants to help out.

3) The 1983 Washington Post article that was published and then immediately retracted (rumored under force/threat) - I WAS able to find that link:

For your convenience, I have posted an excerpt, below - I'm sure most have seen this before. Remember this was countered, vehemently and immediately...

By Thomas O'Toole, Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, December 30, 1983 ; Page A1

A heavenly body possibly as large as the giant planet Jupiter and possibly so close to Earth that it would be part of this solar system has been found in the direction of the constellation Orion by an orbiting telescope aboard the U.S. infrared astronomical satellite.

So mysterious is the object that astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a nearby "protostar" that never got hot enough to become a star, a distant galaxy so young that it is still in the process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so shrouded in dust that none of the light cast by its stars ever gets through.

"All I can tell you is that we don't know what it is," Dr. Gerry Neugebauer, IRAS chief scientist for California's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and director of the Palomar Observatory for the California Institute of Technology, said in an interview.

Yes, an awful lot of effort here - no, I'm no shill - I examine all theories, no matter how ridiculous.

[edited for grammar & spelling]

[edit on 10/29/2009 by SquirrelNutz]

posted on Oct, 29 2009 @ 09:16 PM
This may or may not be off the wall....wouldnt be the first time I bounced off it. About two years ago, I noticed that the chemtrails (spread routinely and seasonally here in the Atlanta area) all of a sudden, for a period of about 18 months, seemed to be targeted at blocking the sun. At first I thought it was to keep down the heat or maybe to prevent people who photograph the chemtrails from getting clear shots, but now I'm reconsidering these thoughts...maybe it was simply to keep us from seeing something. I noticed a map of the world with a shaded area in the newstory from, was it Italy (second or third video you posted) and it got me to thinking....

posted on Oct, 29 2009 @ 09:50 PM

Originally posted by badmedia
Do you guys even think about the things you say before you say them? This is "proof" from around the world? Why not ask if there is a valid explanation, or if it is possible, rather than relying on commonly known camera oddities?
Oh I see you wan't proof. You mean like the big daddy to tell you or "us". "NASA". It's not gonna happen. So get out and do something with your life. Get to know the world you live in. You will find plenty of truth. But since you don't believe it's no wonder your full of apathy. Or wait maybe apathy is suiting your profession

Get busy living or die trying.

It is lite up like the sun is. Why is that significant? In order for something to show up during the day like that would mean that it was either very bright on it's own, or it was reflecting light from the sun.

Oh yeah, something wrong with the "cam", so your gonna wait till it cause's the planet to stand still while the gravitational pull pulls the surface apart. Oh I'm sure the camera will still take funny pictures.

Now, if it is bright enough on it's own to make the picture, then it would be quite visible and atleast 100 times brighter than even the planets. Those are big light sources in the videos if we assume they aren't sundogs.

Why would it be a 100 times brighter? Can you back up that statement. I have this allergy to BS. I'm shaking it right off now, until you come back and start looking somewhat intellegent about this subject.

BTW Nibru is a dark red planet that orbits a dark star. Explain to me how it would be 100 times brighter than any planet in the sky? If it's smaller than Jupiter - is darker than Jupiter, and lacks sunlight reflection(which Jupiter has) Can you explain to me HOW NIBRU SHOULD BE A HUNDRED TIMES BRIGHTER.

Because the earth rotates around the sun. This means that it would only be visible in that 1 spot for a short period of time, and the the time behind the sun would be minimal of time.Which means the only way this object could stay hidden behind the sun and not show up so bright at night, is if it was on an orbit similar to that of earths. Otherwise, as the earth makes it rotation around, the object would come more and more into view, and go across the sky just as the galaxy itself does.

It's coming from the south directly up at an angle between Mars and Jupiter. What are you talking about again?

As if it orbits the sun as claimed, then it will be following keplers laws. So if it is a good distance away from the sun, it is traveling slower and so forth. Only if it was in sync with the earth in speed and such could it stay hidden behind the sun all year long.
It's travelling much faster than the planets orbiting our sun. Like our own sun travelling on the spiral disk in the Milky way. I did an analogy with an Astronomer to calculate how fast Nibru is going. And his test were bases if it were to arrive between 2012, 2020. If it arrived in those dates it would have to travel very fast. He's the mathmatician. So he would know the exact numbers. But it's coming from Canis major and Sirius. It is said to be "Sirius C" which is our dark star and it connnects as a bridge in our local star cluster. This is from my own perspective and channeling. Sirius C is where the Annunaki are from and there homeworlds is on this dark star system. When our dark star's planetoids come into fiiction with our own solar system, it creates havok. This havok is what I call nessecary evolution.

It's why it's sometimes called the pheonix or great red destroyer.

If Jupiter were to suddenly start heading directly towards the sun today, it would take over 3 years before it reached the sun? The distances being talked about are that big. This means if a planet X existed, it would have to already be as close as Jupiter to be here in 2012, or in that time frame.

But Nibru is not heading for the Sun, Infact it's not coming anywhere near the Sun. Our dark star outermost planet comes in contact between Jupiter and Mars. It's orbit is highly ecliptical. It has wretched havok in the past with our solar system. It is responsible for the present state of our planets orbits. Our relationship between our dark star is not a regular double star binary. It is a binary of course. But it's connected to other stars in our local cluster. It flungs through spacetime and passes through these stars such as Alpha centauri and Sirius etc. This proves how tightlipped NASA are on this. They just don't want you to know or be prepared for this. It's real and it's coming. It's like your darkness coming knocking on your door. You can face it or run away and perish. Face your fears as they say.
The speed of our dark star is going to be at least a few times faster than our planets orbit. If your an Astronomer you should know that.
But I guess your not.

Did you know that the stars and such that are near us change in distance all the time? And that over millions and millions of years, 1 comes "close" to us. Do you know what distance is considered close? Over 1 light year away.

Do you know the speed our Binary goes at? Or heck our own sun. All our stars are on a spiral disk. Which is called the milky way. We are going as gravity commands. So in other words all stars are going in a certain motion.

Are you a dis info agent, or trying to be this mis informed.?

And yet, a star coming even that close to us will have enough gravitational pull to upset our solar system and cause asteroids and comets to change paths and bombard the planets?now we are talking about an object that shows up that big and bright next to our sun and it's not causing any problems?
It has already begun.

And ya know, I can keep on going and keep on going. But this is stuff you should have learned in 8th grade general science.
School is for people who want their minds owned. You get what I mean

Being open minded is great However, in order to find out what is "true", then you must also be able to point out the things that are false. There is no reason or excuse for trying to push this stuff off like this. Even a tiny bit of research would show why these things are false

Open mindness is great. Helps you see past BS. Like knowing what your doing now.

[edit on 29-10-2009 by Mind1universe]

posted on Oct, 29 2009 @ 09:58 PM
reply to post by segurelha

Just because you didn't see evidence, does'nt mean it's not there!

It's like i have a blue teapot in my house. I'm not letting you see my teapot. So of course your gonna be this way. Sad way to be though!

Depending on others to prove reality. The reality you can't comprehend or understand. "yet"

posted on Oct, 29 2009 @ 10:06 PM
reply to post by SquirrelNutz

So where do you believe the object went between 1983 and now?

The reason I ask this because Jupiter can be seen on most nights quite clearly, and it is 591 million KM's away.

posted on Oct, 30 2009 @ 08:07 AM

Originally posted by Mind1universe
reply to post by segurelha

Just because you didn't see evidence, does'nt mean it's not there!

It's like i have a blue teapot in my house. I'm not letting you see my teapot. So of course your gonna be this way. Sad way to be though!

Depending on others to prove reality. The reality you can't comprehend or understand. "yet"

"The failure to observe an object only proves one thing: You have failed to observe the object."
- Dr. Brian Marseden, Director of the Minor Planet Center,
[Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics]

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by SquirrelNutz

So where do you believe the object went between 1983 and now?

The reason I ask this because Jupiter can be seen on most nights quite clearly, and it is 591 million KM's away.

- Per Nibiru advocates, this object is still (This day) 2-3x that distance - about 11AU, and...
- It is in the southern hemisphere, coming right up from the south pole (or, is this a convenient can-be-viewed-by-hardly-anyone tactic? who knows)

posted on Oct, 30 2009 @ 05:07 PM
reply to post by Lichter daraus

I am in the UK and before hearing of Nibiru, a few months ago seen this very same 'light' next to the sun and presumed it was Venus or something I should have heard about from our solar system being visible.

I search engined it to find out and it brings up mostly Nibiru.

I didn't take a picture of it though absolutely seen it, tried looking for it since though never got the right conditions whenever I remember to look.

However I took a picture of the moon a few weeks ago and there were 3 lights circling it, similar size as the Nibiru light and on the photo the light on the second picture moved southwards of the moon, 3 lights in triangular formation. The sky was before dusk and the moon extraordinarily bright.

I would post the picture if the media function was enabled.

[edit on 30-10-2009 by theabsolutetruth]

<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in