It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by McGinty
reply to post by manmaidslave
I guess you didn't really watch the vids, then?!
There's plenty of flare and reflection going on, but there's also a dark spot beside the sun that certainly isn't a reflection etc.
It may well be Venus, or some other known body or phenomena, but flare & reflection it ain't.
Amazing how many people visit this site apparently looking for answers, yet can't wait to give their own answers without, it seems, thinking about it. Reflection and lens flare moves, or changes when the lens moves. If it stays put, then it's not merely a 'light-illusion', it's an object.
Originally posted by Cole DeSteele
reply to post by erasedhistory
I'll be sure to add you to this rediculous list of 'I told you so" emails/ texts I will be sending out beginning 12/13/2012- I've already scheduled that day off from work.
Originally posted by DaWhiz
Originally posted by notreallyalive
Originally posted by arcnaver
Don't you think that if it were really there and that close to the sun back then as well, that after 5 or so years and five Earth Orbits, we would have seen a different perspective? Nope, it always seems to be right around the same spot.
See this is science - take logic, science, and rational thought and totally disprove this (again)! Good job.
I'm gonna bring this one step more obvious.
Say there's a big beachball in front of your house. If you walk 'round back, you're NOT going to be able to see it!
Our Earth "walked around back" of the Sun. If you still believe it's Niburu you are a fool.
Thank you Arcnaver for bringing some common sense and provable, obvious facts to this argument.
[edit on 19-10-2009 by notreallyalive]
Oh and I guess this explains why that pesky North Star is always in the same position in the sky or the constellations for that matter? Or why they are only seen in their locations on certain parts of the earth like The Southern Cross?
Sorry, but the beach ball theory does not wash. Go back to the basics on these and other phenomena that you've missed.
Originally posted by djusdjus
Originally posted by McGinty
reply to post by manmaidslave
I guess you didn't really watch the vids, then?!
There's plenty of flare and reflection going on, but there's also a dark spot beside the sun that certainly isn't a reflection etc.
It may well be Venus, or some other known body or phenomena, but flare & reflection it ain't.
Amazing how many people visit this site apparently looking for answers, yet can't wait to give their own answers without, it seems, thinking about it. Reflection and lens flare moves, or changes when the lens moves. If it stays put, then it's not merely a 'light-illusion', it's an object.
what's even more amazing is how many people flock to this site to let their brain flop onto the floor they've left their mind so open! lol
don't post stuff that is easily trashed if you don't want it to be trashed..
people like a mystery, but it is wrong to assume they are idiots and will fall for such nonsense as this hoax of bad astronomy, bad interpretation and Sitchinesque lies generated to take money from brains on floors.
The following quote comes from a Unicus Magazine article “Crop Circle Astral Symbology” by Steve Repetti:
“A planet at least four times larger than Tiamat approached from deep space, and was called Nibiru, or Marduk in Babylon. Nibiru was gravitationally attracted into our solar system and began passing the outer planets so closely that they exchanged moons …Tiamat was cleaved in two, nearly half of which was scattered out and spread into what is now called the asteroid belt, just beyond Mars. The surving “head” of Tiamat moved closer to the Sun, took up its new orbit ahead of Mars and was renamed Eridu/Earth…The symmetry in some of the most complex pictograms are repeating a message…The Earth appears to be circled by way of a straight path to a larger solid body. There are two broken paths resembling equation marks on either side of the main connecting pathway. As a broken path, it would appear to represent a transitional object or event in the transformation or exchange of the two connected spheres on its sides. This represents the role Nibiru played between Earth and Mars…The areas in position 4, 5, 6 are the most confusing, because this is where Nibiru collided with Tiamat and released Earth to a new position, replacing the position of Mars. It is important to note: Tiamat existed long before the collision with Nibiru which generated Earth and the asteroid belt.
Originally posted by fetidchimp
reply to post by InfaRedMan
It's worse than you think..........i was just going through microsoft telescope again and found something rather disturbing.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/6ac78136fd62.jpg[/atsimg]
I for one welcome our new ant overlords.....
Originally posted by Paroxysm
Originally posted by MissSmartypants
There certainly is a lot of conflicting information about Nibiru. It has been described as having what appear to be wings
There was also this SOHO (LASCO C3) image from March of this year (which showed some anomaly which appeared to have "wings". If I remember correctly debunkers/skeptics were claiming that it was a 'Sungrazing Comet':
sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov...
There is a picture posted at www.cyberspaceorbit.com... which is called the "Ra" image because there is a feature that looks like the symbol for the Egyptian god Ra. This is a perfect example of a bright object blooming. If you go through the SOHO archive, you'll see this happening whenever a bright object is in the image. Venus is the brightest thing you'll see, and it blooms quite a bit. I don't know what was in the SOHO field in the Ra image, but it was bright and it bloomed (it may have been a very energetic CR). Those "wings" are not real. They are simply electrons that overflowed inside the CCD itself.
You can see several examples on this page: www.iwonderproductions.com... In fact, the explanation given by Joe Gurman on that page is correct, and the webpage author didn't believe him. The cosmic rays and bright objects give the same shape every time because what's happening is inside the CCD, not on the sky.