Should Morbidly Obese Kids Be Taken from Their Parents?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 19-10-2009 @ 12:59 PM by tothetenthpower
reply to post by Wertdagf



Why is that people are always advocating death for people?

I mean come on folks, so the parents are dropping the ball and I would say that is something which is detrimental to society. But it's not worth them being killed over now is it?

In any case, thanks for all the great responses, it seems like Education and oversight is the appropriate way forward.

~Keeper



reply posted on 19-10-2009 @ 02:22 PM by concernedcitizan
reply to post by Witness2008



The "wealthy and pampered" can afford to eat healthy. With my income bracket I can afford to shop at Whole Foods and other higher end shops. The poor do not have that luxury. In the days of Diamond Jim Brady being was asign of wealth. It's flipped the other way now. And just who is going to be the "Obesity General"?


reply posted on 20-10-2009 @ 08:52 PM by Unity_99
Unfortunately this entire thing is obscene. Do you really think the government may tell you or your family what to eat? Do you want to know what makes some people overweight, and there are many health issues, but its the kind of poisons and low graded nutrients put in the foods that are affordable to many familes, and in an economic situation where rent is more than 1/3rd your income, possibley as much as 2/3rd so people are overworked, junk food and fast food is all that is possible, and many kids are home stuffing their faces while parents work.

But beyond that, the idea that they may try to force someone on a diet against their will is beyond sickening. This is just another drama and human rights issue. As a parent, I wouldnt have tolerated it, and would have either sued or started a revolution to end NWO.
I mean it too. This injustice would never go down with my living eyes seeing it. Just so you know.

The question is, how far do you intend to let NWO go. These dramas are extremely abusive.

Earth changes are coming, thats why they've built those bases. And the attempt to sully everyones hands for not standing up for their brothers and sisters across the planet, and for mother earth makes a bad situation, kind a negative harvest is what the leaders are going for.

Surely something will make you guys get it. People's weights, are absolutely none of your business or any nazi doctors either. They have such massive egos and think they can dominate others legally. Stand up for everyone, tall, thin, short ,fat , bald, green, purple, black, white and inbetweens. Treat everyone as you would wish to be treated and with the greatest respect for their dignity. Diet is something that can only be encouraged, not dictated. But stand up to fascism.

[edit on 20-10-2009 by Unity_99]


reply posted on 20-10-2009 @ 08:53 PM by A Fortiori
reply to post by tothetenthpower



In a short answer, no. Emotional health is important, too, and kids love their parents.

If the kid was on drugs they would invite the whole family into a rehab program. If it was a pregnant thirteen year old they wouldn't take the child away, either. They would insist the entire family get help together.

Families have always had issues since the dawn of time. Books, poems, movies all tell the tale of the Family Dinner where all the issues come out. I am not sure that families have to be perfect in order to be "healthy".

Yes, morbidly obese is a terribly unhealthy condition, but they could probably spend the same amount of money in counseling as fostering. Also, considering that the FDA does NOTHING to warn people about processed foods and pushed that breads and pasta pyramid the government has little room to talk about "health".


reply posted on 20-10-2009 @ 09:49 PM by NoJoker13
reply to post by tothetenthpower



I believe it clearly shows poor supervision by the adults if a child is able to consume such an amount of food to become "morbidly" obese. I mean lets be logical here, how would one gain so much weight? Especaiily when they are so young, I can tell you except for the fact of school I know 98% of what my child consumes. So in all actuality I would see this as some form of neglect.


reply posted on 20-10-2009 @ 10:01 PM by DevolutionEvolvd
Originally posted by NoJoker13
reply to
post by tothetenthpower



I believe it clearly shows poor supervision by the adults if a child is able to consume such an amount of food to become "morbidly" obese. I mean lets be logical here, how would one gain so much weight? Especaiily when they are so young, I can tell you except for the fact of school I know 98% of what my child consumes. So in all actuality I would see this as some form of neglect.


You're assuming that obesity is simply caused by overeating and gluttony. This is not the case. You ask the question, how can they gain so much weight?

If the mother ate a poor diet while carrying the child, the child be predisposed to becoming obese. Couple the predisposition with a poor diet and you have a recipe for severe obesity.


reply posted on 20-10-2009 @ 10:16 PM by KrazyJethro
Originally posted by DevolutionEvolvd
And do you think that those living at or close to poverty have the access or even the time to properly research the subject, especially when all they need is a food pyramid?


I'm at or close to poverty, yet my standard of living is much higher than people with fewer children and bigger salaries. I make use of the resources I can find, like I expect others to do.

Do I live in a tech-savvy area? Yes, but that just means it's 10x more expensive to live so I'd call it a draw. Even if one just watched TV (which I rarely do) or simply read nutritional information they would glean enough information to not be a total wreck.

Unfortunately, your ideology on government education is not shared by the populous. Why would the average American take the time to read several books, with the hope of properly comprehending them, when government recommendations are illustrated and very short.

-Dev


I disagree. Americans are still working on an outdated model of wages/productivity/standard of living. My generation will not fair as well as my parents did, and my children will have a harder time of it.

The money coming out of their pockets is seen but experienced much less then, say, your electric bill. You actually have to write a check for that, so when energy prices are bad, people respond.

Education isn't like that because few people pay directly. My point is that they only look at the result rather than the whole process when determining a problem/solution. The normal solution is more money. How many of that same populous is game to give that money?

Quite a bit fewer I'd imagine.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



First Heartless Man - You Don\'t Really Need A Heart or A Pulse
  Posted 7 days ago with 51 member flags
Doctor Uses Coconut Oil to Reverse Husband\'s Alzheimer\'s Disease
  Posted 12 days ago with 28 member flags
A brief look at water fluoridation and the insanity of it
  Posted 10 days ago with 28 member flags
Brains of Addicts Are Inherently Abnormal
  Posted 6 days ago with 20 member flags
FDA say body is a drug and has the right to regulate it!
  Posted 9 days ago with 18 member flags
MPD/DID and Quantum Psychiatry
  Posted 13 days ago with 12 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 13 hours ago, 107 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 9 hours ago, 88 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 7 hours ago, 61 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 11 hours ago, 48 replies