Originally posted by Iamonlyhuman
Geesh... even the poster is a rip-off.
Not really. It still stands as a great piece of art.
That the photographer didn't get original recognition is a sin of omission, a simple mistake, rather that commission, a purposeful act of
cheating.
However when the actual source of the photo was discovered by the artist the cover-up became one of commission, and to no purpose what-so-ever, in my
view.
He's going to have to pay big time and his reputation will take a big hit, but the poster still stands a great piece of art and is already an iconic
American image.
I just wonder what this does to all the parodies?
|
