Nibiru/Planet X/Wormwood picture gone from Google Earth Sky, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 88 times


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 01:00 PM by Copernicus
reply to post by Isis_Is_I


Also binary star systems are extremely common in the universe, so why would it be impossible in our solar system? Even NASA says 2/3 of all star systems are binary. This is probably not a lie.

Originally posted by Isis_Is_I
I am very open to the possibility of another body entering our solar system. In fact, hasn't science already admitted that something very large is having an effect on all our planets in the solar system?


Yes they have. I posted this earlier but Im posting it again because its interesting..

Some good links to read:

Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...


My interest got caught by this in particular:


So not only are satellites being affected by this "something", but comets are also affected, and now an unexpected secular increase in the astronomical unit, or the distance between the planets and the Sun has been found to have increased.




[edit on 18-10-2009 by Copernicus]


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 01:03 PM by SharkBait
reply to post by cosmicstorm


CosmicStorm. Your Yowusa video has some interesting issues in it. But i have to still come back to my point i made earlier in the discussion.

As you can see in the 'leaked' video footage, it shows a Shinning object in the sky, almost like a Sun. If this object was Nibiru and was going to be close enough to Earth to impact our Magnetic field etc by 2012. We would be able to see it with the most basic of Telescopes by now.? We even have the co-ordinates of where to look.

If its still too far off for telescopes that we can get our hands on,(then it has to be SO far off) then i doubt its a 2012 threat, if it ever was one. Because an object of that size cannot travel that far in 3 years.








reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 01:18 PM by Isis_Is_I
reply to post by Copernicus


And let's not forget this man- www.rumormillnews.com...

My own research into this guy brings me to conclude he was desperate to share his findings with the world, and then he....you guessed it, died.

I actually think the campaign against Planet x is so big, that people are actually afraid to admit they see this theory as possible. Not Astronomers and such like, but just normal folk, even on here at ATS, no one ever wants to talk about it...

Yet I would say that ancient history provides us with enough to take it very seriously.

In fact, planet x and pole shifts make absolute perfect sense to me. When looking through eyes that see the Universe as cyclic. Cycles within cycles.

I don't think anyone can deny that something major is happening, not just to us, but to our celestial neighbours, and I don't think the elite or NWO have anything to do with it or have any power over it (they are however, perfect distractions to keep us from looking outside our Earthly bubble!)



reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 01:35 PM by Pauligirl
Originally posted by Copernicus
reply to post by Pauligirl


That was just a variation of your previous response. Its still claimed to be a missing picture. A glitch.

And that is what I would expect them to say if they were hiding information. Wouldnt you?


Well, that's the thing. I don't think they are hiding anything. I don't think they could hide it-whoever "they" maybe.

This is the part (and it's in both articles) that gets my attention:
Here’s the problem with that claim: Melbourne, Austrailia sits at about 37 degrees South. The location of the South Africa Large Telescope sits at about 34 degrees South. There are observatories in Argentina and Chile as far south as 35 degrees. There is no point in the southern sky that is not covered by one or more telescopes! In order to ‘hide’ from these telescopes, this object would have to travel in an impossible spiral shaped path to stay close to the sun! Even that would not help, because we have telescopes that watch the sun ( SOHO and STEREO ) and which have detected near sun objects such as comets!



reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 01:36 PM by MissSmartypants
reply to post by tothetenthpower


It is being seen and it is being photographed. It's so close to the sun in the sky that you simply can't see it with the naked eye....but you can photgraph it.


[edit on 10/18/2009 by MissSmartypants]


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 01:36 PM by BuffaloJoe
reply to post by cosmicstorm


Never saw that video. Very interesting indeed. How was someone so on top of Nibiru videos that they compiled all that information from 1-hour of a youtube user's existence? That alone seems suspect. If that user was "censored" within one hour, how come the new video alleging the coverup has remained? One would think that this video would receive the same interest.



reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 01:46 PM by Jim Scott
reply to post by SharkBait

I debunk N also. Never gonna happen. However, there are those who want a Savior to save the Earth because they can't see mankind doing it. I understand that point of view. Maybe it's time for us to get away from the computer screen and go out to plant a tree.

As far as a pole shift, due to crossing the equator of the Milky Way, that doesn't happen for over 2 million years. That was cited elsewhere on ATS.

Relax.

Have a cup of coffee.

Let's start working on the Save the Earth program.




[edit on 18-10-2009 by Jim Scott]


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 01:50 PM by Spooky Fox Mulder
Alright, this is indeed spooky.

Go to Google Sky and put coordinates -6.01931, -91.5903 and see the big fat black rectangle that covers the place where Nibiru/Planet X would have been.

What is going on?




Peace,
Mulder


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 01:54 PM by tothetenthpower
reply to post by MissSmartypants


That's impossible.

We go AROUND the sun.

Which means that at one point it would not be "beside" it, it would show up somehwere else in the sky.

So saying it's "too close to the sun" is not a good answer.

~Keeper


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 02:08 PM by Pauligirl
Originally posted by MissSmartypants
reply to post by tothetenthpower


It is being seen and it is being photographed. It's so close to the sun in the sky that you simply can't see it with the naked eye....but you can photgraph it.


[edit on 10/18/2009 by MissSmartypants]


If that's the case, wouldn't it show up on SOHO?
sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov...


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 02:13 PM by -Thom-
reply to post by Pauligirl


Exactly.
IMO, Nibiru is a hoax.



reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 02:13 PM by Copernicus
Originally posted by Spooky Fox Mulder
Alright, this is indeed spooky.

Go to Google Sky and put coordinates -6.01931, -91.5903 and see the big fat black rectangle that covers the place where Nibiru/Planet X would have been.

What is going on?




Peace,
Mulder



Apparently the sceptics think its a natural glitch in the system that just happens to be where Nibiru would have been.

The governments and the disinfo guys will deny this until its no longer possible to deny.

Originally posted by Pauligirl
Well, that's the thing. I don't think they are hiding anything. I don't think they could hide it-whoever "they" maybe.


So you dont think they could (A) hide it but you think they could get away with (B) saying there is a glitch in the system? Has it occured to you that they can can away with A by doing B?

No? Ok, carry on.


[edit on 18-10-2009 by Copernicus]


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 02:20 PM by -Thom-
reply to post by Copernicus


The rectangle as a proof for Planet X? No, too far fetched, AND too simple for me. You should do better.


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 02:29 PM by Isis_Is_I
reply to post by -Thom-


A hoax that is thousands and thousands of years old, that in itself is impressive!


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 02:42 PM by -Thom-
reply to post by Isis_Is_I


You trust ancient scrolls etc. more than logic?
I am not an astronomer, but if FSL exists, then it would be visible with the naked eye. Simple as that. What proof do you have to trust your info more than mine? Or better: how can you disprove the fact that it must be visible by now?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russians know, We assume, NASA is silent ...
  Posted 12 days ago with 35 member flags
Sun flares affect our pineal gland, causing mass awakening?
  Posted 4 days ago with 34 member flags
Are we paying attention enough? Strange Sounds in the sky
  Posted 19 days ago with 33 member flags
Bring Your Toothbrush? A Journey To The Stars...
  Posted 10 days ago with 23 member flags
2012 Believers are the Definition of Sheeple
  Posted 16 days ago with 14 member flags
Tell me to stop
  Posted 9 days ago with 11 member flags
The Chevy Silverado 2012 Mayan Apocalpse Commercial
  Posted 9 days ago with 10 member flags