It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Cross8712
So how do you know that "this planet/star is part of several major ancient civilizations and religions." You don't do you? You did not read the original texts did you? You have to trust someone like Sitchin to do the translations and readings for you.
So now you believe the "lying thieves" that write the garbage such as Velikovsky, Sitchin, Ickes, von Daniken, ...
You really have no idea about the veracity of the data that is "thousands of years old".
The caduceus is sometimes erroneously used as a symbol for medicine, especially in North America, due to confusion with the traditional medical symbol, the rod of Asclepius, which has only a single snake and no wings.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Cole Minor
The images shown that are supposed to be flying machines are repaired hieroglyphics, nothing more.
They have zero evidence that proves their opinion is true...
The glyphs are a result of both erosion of the stone surface (evident elsewhere in the temple) and the process of filling in and re-carving the stone to replace some of the original hieroglyphics. The technical term for such a surface that has been written on more than once is a palimpsest. The usurping and modifying of inscriptions was common in ancient Egypt throughout its history. The Abydos glyph was modified at least once in antiquity, and perhaps twice. Some of the filling has fallen out in places where the older and the newer inscriptions overlap, and the result is unique and odd-looking.
If the ancient Egyptians had vehicles such as helicopters, submarines, and jet airplanes, one would expect to find some evidence of this other than in a single inscription on the lintel of a single temple.
And when in the hell did wikipedia become a trusted source here on ATS or anywhere else for that matter?
Originally posted by stereologist
Actually here is very good evidence. It is the belief that these are modern looking devices that have zero evidence.
Originally posted by stereologist
If the ancient Egyptians had vehicles such as helicopters, submarines, and jet airplanes, one would expect to find some evidence of this other than in a single inscription on the lintel of a single temple.
Originally posted by stereologist
I see you don't point to a particular problem. I see you offered no supporting information little bunny.
But according to you, only your opinions are the right ones… to you, there are no other answers and anyone who suggests such a thing are stupid, liars, and whatever else you have called people within this thread