It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Amagnon
Originally posted by xelamental
Originally posted by finnegan
Conspiracists, I think some of you may be taking the Op to personally, although I do think it may have been better if any particular cases were left out of the discussion. Another problem lies with people who are just utterly deniable of anything no matter what information is presented to them. But I don't think it's too much to ask to provide solid evidence and to look at it logically.
Here is a video I posted in another thread which is also very applicable here
video by QualiaSoup
That's the best video on this topic I have ever seen.
I would love to see some "believers" takes on this.
This video represents in my view - the 'normal' approach to thinking. I wish I could make a small video to show how ludicrously limited and biased the style of thinking it advocates really is - however, it is largely how people think.
The problem occurs when you 'accept' something as true. So your skeptical - but finally evidence piles up - and you say, ok ET's really do exist. That decision of yours, did not pop aliens into existence - they either existed, or did not exist before you made that choice, and the same state of the universe continued smoothly along after you made that choice.
However, what has happened now is that you have biased your mind. Any evidence that aliens cannot exist can now safely be discounted. Even further than that, if you see a book titled "The Impossibility of the ET Presence" - you will not glance at it, nor read it. Reading it would be a waste of your time - because you already 'know' that ET's exist.
Any evidence that they do exist, no matter how flawed can safely be assumed to be true. With a little bit of mental tweaking from yourself - you can convince yourself the most tenuous evidence becomes 'solid' evidence.
My conclusion then - if you wish to retain a critical mind, and truly be able to assess data in an unbiased way - then you must suspend belief - all belief.
My model of thought goes like this.
Everything goes in - all data, all evidence - it doesn't matter how ridiculous it is. It is then assembled into groups - perhaps it is assembled underneath a statement of possibility. Such as Do aliens exist. Then you just pour all the evidence into that space. Then you have a good understanding of how the question might be answered both in the affirmative - and in the negative. Now you can also start to assign a probability to the likely hood that the possibility is real (true), or unreal (false).
For myself - the evidence I have indicates that intelligent aliens exist somewhere (lets say over 99%), that they have visited earth in the past (around 70%), that they are visiting today (maybe 60%).
The correct mental exercise here is to look for ways to reduce those percentages - because a high percentage is likely to create bias - such my 99% for aliens existing somewhere. To reduce that number I would be looking for info that tells me there are less stars than originally estimated, that the plants so far located are errors - that perhaps the earth and liquid water are freakishly improbable and so forth.
[edit on 18-10-2009 by Amagnon]
Originally posted by nightmare_david
Where's Eddie at now?
I'm anxious to see his replies to a lot of the posts in here. This is the most attention he's ever gotten and he's actually nowhere to be seen. That's pretty amazing. Any other time he'd be on here soaking it all up.
Originally posted by ByteChanger
Originally posted by nightmare_david
Where's Eddie at now?
I'm anxious to see his replies to a lot of the posts in here. This is the most attention he's ever gotten and he's actually nowhere to be seen. That's pretty amazing. Any other time he'd be on here soaking it all up.
lol... Yeah I was wondering where he was too... He started this thread, but doesn't care to refute anything posed to him.
Sounds like he has the "don't-show-me-no-irrefutable-evidence-I-don't-need-it" attitude.
Personally, I don't mind skeptics. Being skeptical is part of life. I just have an issue if the skeptic becomes a a-hole.
The Original Post is full of insults and attacks. That is not a skeptic, its a septic. It is a ignorant, generalized attack on 'believers' with a call for help from true intelligent skeptics. Notice not many skeptics came to his rescue and most see the OP for what it is... A immature attack on a group of people.
He is full of prejudice & hate, as he applies his judgments to an entire group of people without even knowing them and then starts a thread with a post full of insults and attacks.
Originally posted by Skeptical Ed
Take advantage of the great tool being offered to you, our logical, reasoning minds!
Originally posted by nightmare_david
The few things that really bothered me about Eddie is when he would jump on people for talking about books they've read. He would talk about books being hearsay and how they offer nothing. He would then turn around and use certain books he read as solid evidence for something he believes.
He would attack others who couldn't provide photos of their sightings. Then go on to say he has photos and videos of his sightings, yet never showed any of it because he "didn't know how to upload the stuff" when he was told how numerous times.
I could go on and on, but he's not worth it. I've been calling him out on his BS for a few weeks now trying to get more and more to see him for what he really was and in the end he did it all himself
Good job, Eddie
Originally posted by finnegan
Conspiracists, I think some of you may be taking the Op to personally, although I do think it may have been better if any particular cases were left out of the discussion. Another problem lies with people who are just utterly deniable of anything no matter what information is presented to them. But I don't think it's too much to ask to provide solid evidence and to look at it logically.
Here is a video I posted in another thread which is also very applicable here
video by QualiaSoup