No Planers Do Dig Up Some Interesting Stuff, Gotta Admit, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 12:56 AM by nwodeath
reply to post by TrueAmerican


Have you seen this yet? I found this s few weeks ago while browsing ATS. This is what gave me the idea to do something similar.

www.freedomdomain.com...

I had to read the page like 3 or 4 times, because each time I did I found new info that made me think even more. I have been convinced about all this for some time, but very few people are actively doing any research on it in any new or groundbreaking way. This site breaks down some things from September Clues, but also did their own independent research it seems.

I would recommend reading it a few times and then please do post your thoughts on specific issues and points. The site makes very good points and has picture comparisons.



[edit on 18-10-2009 by nwodeath]


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 01:05 AM by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Originally posted by nwodeath
Just because you say it's so, does not make it so.
BTW, who is cointelpro? I thought it was people who cover up the no plane theories, like the planehuggers always do. I always thought these were the real cointelpro.


Let me try this again, below, but first I must explain what COINTELPRO is / was. COINTELPRO was much more than spreading disinfo to get people to spread misinfo. It was about total disruption of movement(s). One of its targets was the Black Panthers. In hindisght, the BP didnt whither away from lack of neccesity, instead it rotted from the inside out. Agents were placed inside to to influence it in violent directions. Another facet had the FBI mail fake death 'hit' letters on behalf of the leadership of the BP & local crime gang in that city, which resulted in actual deaths and blood on the streets. Others facets included actual assassinations (ie Fred Hampton).

Divide and conquer. The 9/11 movement was divided and conquered, via No Planes. And their agents along with unwitting minions engage in character assassination against the down to earth leaders in the now fabled movement.

As I argue et al, you dont even need WTC demolition examples to rally an unstappaoble true 911 lynching movement. Demo's hurt the movement, No Planes KILLS it.

And now to the PROOF I linked in above that is being ignored:

Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
I'd like to make it even more perilous:

In addition to Robz examples, I'd like to add to that:

1] How did they manage to 'spit' the monster fireballs out the other side with perfect timing?




2] And launch the 'engine' and related debris out with perfect momentum and angles coinciding with the planes speed and impact angles?
Note the smoketrail from the engine:

CLICK THIS ONE:
www.erichufschmid.net...
It shows the shooting engine in high-res!


When you add those in with my other argument, which I've posted in multiple threads yet not one single person has been able to answer it (be sure to click the first link):
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
In the first video of interest the cameraman was on W. Broadway, which was right in line with where the the plane debris was ejected from the opposite side of WTC2. At around time 7:00 the impact occurs. You can hear pandemonium and loud noises as if large things are crashing down around him. Then, as he turns back, you can see plane debris that had apparently landed and killed a pedestrian.
911blogger.com...


www.lib.utexas.edu...
As we've all been covering inother recent threads, other large bits of plane debris were found including a 'still smoking' engine that landed on a street corner not too far from our above cameraman.


While I haven't done an advanced analysis on the raw source video presented above, it does seem to debunk the "MIB Flashy Thing" Theory for how they placed the plane debris on the streets, once and for all.

www.abovetopsecret.com...[/im]

It's case closed. But, if you insist...

For those of you claiming only 4 parts were found, here's some more tidbits from none other than Killtown's website, all WTC related:
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...
killtown.911review.org...


Originally posted by Wizard_In_The_Woods
Nothing you’re saying is weakening the hologram theory. It is my understanding that none of the 9-11 films show holograms. Yes, that’s right, the holograms weren’t caught on camera. The images we see are all CGI inserted fakery.


I see nothing can shake your faith in No Planes.

But since you're obviously right, tell me, how in the world could they prevent every 'rogue' citizen with a video camera from capturing it?

Ok, say you're a conspirator: You have to assess how to ensure getting away with your crime: You consider that you might be able to get away with these mumbo jumbo technologies... But there is one problem: If one single civilian just so happened to get a recording showing no plane whatsoever, you're busted. Even a 10 year old would be clever enough to realize that's not the way to go.

You're suggesting that every camera and tape produced from that day is faked. Sinc etey're faking all of these tapes, why not fake the tapes of the video cameras at the Pentagon to "show" a plane, thus "proving" that one hit there? Why release tapes that look more like a missile than a Boeing? And, again to the 50th time, why not also produce some fake NTSB/ec reports to put the icing on their fabricated event?

No Planes is about as real as Aesop Fables.

Ok, I'll be fair, I won't say that it's impossible, however, considering the difficulty in producing the observed effects to 'near' perfection, in conjunction with the decisions they'd have to go thru in consideration of my statement to you above, and so on, I'd say there's a about a 0.002% chance of "No Planes" being what happened.



reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 01:06 AM by waypastvne
reply to post by nwodeath


No, Simon definitely posted that video at Killtowns fourm:

911movement.org

I'd post you a link but it wouldn't do any good .That web site got Axed about a week ago.



[edit on 18-10-2009 by waypastvne]


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 01:18 AM by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Argh. A few image links at the beginning of my self-quote are now down. The main one is the one that shows the hi-res image of the engines flying out of the building with smoke trails. The high-res video and photographic evidence shows engines shooting out of the building. FACT!

From that we have the conclussion that planes in fact hit the towers. You might dabble over what planes hit the towers, but not the idea that planes didnt hit the towers.

Or you could go for the stretch of imagination that planes didnt hit the towers, and the explosions with resulting fireballs and jet engines ejected to be photographed on the street were engineered and fabricated. But you still have to leap over the idea that instead of just smash actual planes into the buildings theyd make their operation many times more complicated than needed.

I seen a recent post allege that the engines found on the street werent the right ones, so even if that were true why would they send fake ones ejecting from the building? I'm far from convinced that the wrong ones were in fact there, and I'd place a thousands times more potential on the theory that some planes did hit the towers, just not the ones we were told.

You still have to deal with teh 'fake' people who ere supposed to be on the planes and died. I'm still waiting for proof of fake people dying. Or we could say that they hid the real planes and machine gunned the real passengers, and then went to the added lengths of the rest of it all that the No Planers spew. To that I say the idea of that idea making so much noise HAS to be COINTELPRO. These sorts of claims are like a wet dream to the social group known as the "Skeptics", and are a laughable joke to the masses at large.

[edit on 18-10-2009 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss]


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 02:03 AM by titorite
reply to post by IgnoranceIsntBlisss


Ok I will address your statement when YOU ADDRESS MINE FIRST! . I mine.

The engines that hit the pavement... they did not scrape the pavement.

Hmmmm Explain that?!?!


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 03:01 AM by nwodeath
CNN Rector Street Video Comparison
Building Vs. No Building - What do you see? Or what do you NOT see?

Look MA, No Building!!!



[edit on 18-10-2009 by nwodeath]

[edit on 18-10-2009 by nwodeath]

[edit on 18-10-2009 by nwodeath]

[edit on 18-10-2009 by nwodeath]


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 03:46 AM by JPhish
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
C'mon people, the No Plane religion has been smashed to WTC pieces for at least a year on this site. It's sad that to this day the childish COINTELPRO antics of the founders of the No Planers still has the old "this forum is now under close scrutiny" status here at ATS.

For physical PROOF that planes hit the towers see here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

And beyond that read that entire thread.

There is no longer any verifiable "9/11 Truth Movement" thanks to the damaged caused by the No Planes (COINTELPRO) 'movement' in particular.

[edit on 18-10-2009 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss]


do you seriously believe a plane crashed into the pentagon?

do you seriously believe a plane crashed in shanks-ville?

seriously?

reply to post by nwodeath


those two pictures seem like very different points of view nwod

[edit on 10/18/2009 by JPhish]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 15 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 8 days ago with 13 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 19 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
you must try this youre self ????
  Posted 15 days ago with 4 member flags