It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NORAD pulled fighters to Alaska and Canada

page: 1
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 17 2009 @ 08:03 PM
link   
Fighters that could have been used to help intercept the planes on 9/11were pulled away for an excercise.



www.norad.mil...

Sept. 9, 2001

CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN AFS, Colo. – The North American Aerospace Defense Command shall deploy fighter aircraft as necessary to Forward Operating Locations (FOLS) in Alaska and Northern Canada to monitor a Russian air force exercise in the Russian arctic and North Pacific ocean.

NORAD-allocated forces will remain in place until the end of the Russian exercise.



[edit on 17-10-2009 by PHIXER2]

Mod Edit: External Source Tags – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 17/10/2009 by Mirthful Me]




posted on Oct, 17 2009 @ 08:24 PM
link   
reply to post by PHIXER2
 


Interesting, I have posted about this numerous times it was the only exercises that was really going on 911 that we have proof of but remember we were only monitoring their exercises we where not participating in their exercises.

There were no reports of any war games scheduled for NYC on 911 that were reported before 911. Not one single report. Months and years later all these internet articles showed up about war games on 911 but these cannot be substantiated as fact. Any time there are war games to be exercised over a city the military always lets the local government know and there is always a Press release to the public as to not scare the local population.



posted on Oct, 17 2009 @ 08:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by impressme
Interesting, I have posted about this numerous times it was the only exercises that was really going on 911 that we have proof of but remember we were only monitoring their exercises we where not participating in their exercises.


Yes i know we were just montoring but the point was the fighters could have been used to help intercept the planes on 9/11.

There are listngs of other large exercises that are on a normal time frame, and yes there were others going on around 9/11.



posted on Oct, 17 2009 @ 08:40 PM
link   
reply to post by impressme
 




Always a press release?...Really? Like the press release for Air Force 1 flying over New York City with an escort F16!



posted on Oct, 17 2009 @ 08:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by Violater1
Always a press release?...Really? Like the press release for Air Force 1 flying over New York City with an escort F16!


So you think the NORAD press release is not good enough evidence?

What kind of evidence would it take for you to believe something, or are you one of those people who are closed minded and only want to believe what the media has told you?



posted on Oct, 17 2009 @ 09:37 PM
link   
Has anyone ever considered that if you can view this news story that was uploaded on 9th sept. 2001, then maybe the terrorists also read this!?


There were no reports of any war games scheduled for NYC on 911 that were reported before 911. Not one single report. Months and years later all these internet articles showed up about war games on 911 but these cannot be substantiated as fact.


Are you entirely sure about that?

These war games could just be a coincidence.

[edit on 17-10-2009 by john124]



posted on Oct, 17 2009 @ 10:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by PHIXER2
Fighters that could have been used to help intercept the planes on 9/11were pulled away for an excercise.


You couldn't be more wrong even if you tried!

Operation Northern Vigilance was an Operational Mission not an exercise.

www.historycommons.org...

No aircraft that would have otherwise been on alert were used for this mission. It was SOP to have 4 aircraft on alert for the East Coast and that's what was on alert on 9/11. Even if Northern Vigilance had not occurred, there still would have been 4 aircraft on alert.

It wouldn't have made any difference anyway as NORAD was not notified of the hijacked aircraft in enough time for a successful intercept.

Half assed research and a biased agenda lead to half assed allegations.

Misner, I see you haven't changed since you were banned from this Forum. Did you get permission to rejoin or is this a proxy sock? Are you mature enough to admit that you are a sock with the same user name that got you immediately banned at JREF for the second time?

[edit on 17-10-2009 by Reheat]



posted on Oct, 18 2009 @ 12:19 AM
link   
The OP's thread title is not accurate. No USAF fighters would have deployed to FOLs in Canada. NORAD, which is a joint US-Canada organization, would have sent Canadian fighters from Cold Lake AB and Bagotville QC to FOLs in Canada as required for the operation.

Reheat is correct in that this would have had no effect on numbers of A/C on alert status anywhere in the lower 48 or southern Canada.



posted on Oct, 21 2009 @ 09:32 PM
link   
reply to post by erwalker
 


Very weak argument. The fact that there were NUMEROUS exercises scheduled for the week of September 11th left most people that were at norad, neads and other agencies thinking "This is just an exercise" That is how 911 was allowed to happened unimpeded.

There were over 15 hijacked aircraft, numerous cruise missiles, simulated russian attacks, terrorist attacks, bio attacks, all occurring on 911.

These people that are loyal to the official story are on a very small sinking rubber dingy in frigid waters. It will be funny to see them drown and turn blue. .....Fishfood.

[edit on 21-10-2009 by CaptainAmerica2012]



posted on Oct, 21 2009 @ 09:35 PM
link   
Watch this video. These images were taken from a 'brochure' dated June 2001. Look who is on the cover. This proves that 911 was planned and covered by .... you know who.


[edit on 21-10-2009 by CaptainAmerica2012]



posted on Oct, 21 2009 @ 09:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by CaptainAmerica2012
Watch this video. These images were taken from a 'brochure' dated June 2001. Look who is on the cover. This proves that 911 was planned and covered by .... you know who.


The URL contained a malformed video ID.

...must be a conspiracy!!



posted on Oct, 21 2009 @ 10:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by CaptainAmerica2012
Watch this video. These images were taken from a 'brochure' dated June 2001. Look who is on the cover. This proves that 911 was planned and covered by .... you know who.


[edit on 21-10-2009 by CaptainAmerica2012]


Check again.



posted on Oct, 21 2009 @ 11:31 PM
link   
A few things I´d like to point out about the video.
1.- The first statement shown (from GWB) talks about nobody being able to predict an attack using commercial aircraft in such a “massive scale”.
Putting this statement at the beginning of the video is misleading, why?
Because:
1.- The exercises mentioned in it do not discuss the using of hijacked airliners to attack buildings at any time.
2.- The statements by the authorities in the video are about nuclear, biological or chemical attack expected to happen within 10 years.

And well... the final images are really insulting.

Why would you say the video never mentions the attack using hijacked commercial airliners being used as missiles to hit buildings?


[edit on 21-10-2009 by rush969]



posted on Oct, 21 2009 @ 11:50 PM
link   
reply to post by rush969
 


Are you glossing over the fact that Bin Laden was on the cover at 0:45 seconds of the video and that Saddam Hussein is also featured?

Did you really read the fine print? Did you miss "Hijack aircraft" "cruise missiles" and the child like pictures of planes and dotted lines aimed at major cities?

Sigh



posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 08:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by Reheat
You couldn't be more wrong even if you tried!

Operation Northern Vigilance was an Operational Mission not an exercise.



Problenm is that i was not talkign about Northern Vigilance, i was talking abou the excercise in which the planes were pulled away to Alaska and Canada.

remisne@hotmail.com

[edit on 22-10-2009 by REMISNE]



posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 08:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by erwalker
The OP's thread title is not accurate. No USAF fighters would have deployed to FOLs in Canada.


Thats not what the NORAD news relaes states.

remsine@hotmail.com



posted on Oct, 23 2009 @ 01:43 PM
link   
If you would bother to do any research you would find that the main Northern Vigilance is a excercise that pulls Americen and Candian fighters to Alaska and Northern Canada.



posted on Oct, 23 2009 @ 06:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by PHIXER2
Fighters that could have been used to help intercept the planes on 9/11were pulled away for an excercise.



Originally posted by REMISNE

Originally posted by Reheat
You couldn't be more wrong even if you tried!

Operation Northern Vigilance was an Operational Mission not an exercise.



Problenm is that i was not talkign about Northern Vigilance, i was talking abou the excercise in which the planes were pulled away to Alaska and Canada.


No the problem is PHIXER2 made the original statement, not RENISNE. You don't suppose.......?


Originally posted by REMISNE
If you would bother to do any research you would find that the main Northern Vigilance is a excercise that pulls Americen and Candian fighters to Alaska and Northern Canada.


Yep, it sure is and in character too!


Hi, Roger Misner, I thought you were banned a couple of days ago, but here you are again!!!!



posted on Oct, 24 2009 @ 12:59 AM
link   
reply to post by CaptainAmerica2012
 


No. And I only mentioned OBL at the end of the video because I think it an insult to show him wrapped in the U.S. flag.
As for the hijacks and missiles, 2 things.
The hijack mentioned in the video refers to a hijacking as they were before 9/11. Taking an airliner and it´s passengers to a different place than their original destination and making demands.
In fact, I believe the images shown are from a 70´s movie starring Charlton Heston where an airliner with it´s passengers and crew are hijacked by a crazy soldier to Russia with a stop in Alaska.
So, this example has NOTHING TO DO with what happened on 9/11.
Also, the “child like pictures of planes” you refer to are UAV. Unmanned aerial vehicles. (Drones.)
Nothing to do either with passenger airliners.
As far as missiles mentioned, yes I saw that, but don´t see what it has to do with anything. No missiles were used on 9/11.



posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 01:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by Reheat
Hi, Roger Misner, I thought you were banned a couple of days ago, but here you are again!!!!


I guess people are afraid of the truth.

I get suspened and banned from sites that do not like it when i can post facts and evidence (that would hold up in court) that shows reasonable doubt in the official story.



new topics

top topics



 
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join