It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by Matrix Rising
No I don't have to come up with any counter evidence to claim that people may have been mistaken or seen something that is NOT ET. I simply have to read and decide for myself.
Just like you do when you read these things.
I am not arguing the existance, I am arguing your stance of non logic with logic that you refuse to acknowledge.
~Keeper
Originally posted by Matrix Rising
reply to post by Arbitrageur
There's no divisive rhetoric, I'm just stating a fact. What did I say that's not true?
Originally posted by Matrix Rising
UFO skeptics don't use reason. ......
Again, there's zero evidence on the skeptics side. See the skeptic would have to show why it's less likely when it comes to every video, picture, radar report, eyewitness account, mass sighting, trace evidence, abduction case and more.
Originally posted by Matrix Rising
reply to post by Arbitrageur
These people are saying exactly what they saw and experienced.
Originally posted by stanlee
so we are either with you or against you? what sort of dichotomy is this? Are you the jesus of ufology or what?
Originally posted by EsSeeEye
Originally posted by Matrix Rising
reply to post by Arbitrageur
These people are saying exactly what they saw and experienced.
This is where you become divisive. None of us know that these people are saying exactly what they saw and experienced, because none of us are those people.
The fact that you're willing to use the spoken word of a witness as hard evidence to something as massive as alien visitation speaks volumes about your credibility as a researcher.