Intriguing Phobos Anomaly!!!, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 29 times


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 05:21 AM by dashar
reply to post by Misfit



i dont bite when skeptics throw a view point over .
they are the people you meet in the pub you wouldnt normally talk to.
they love to argue and are arogant and blind to any other possibility and wont even spend time to study stuff.because in my opinion it dont fall in there comfort zone.

they remind me of pit ponys

very interesting photo

[edit on 18-10-2009 by dashar]


reply posted on 18-10-2009 @ 10:25 AM by azzllin
reply to post by Outlawstar



I found an image of the Phobos Spacecraft.




Not sure of the dimensions of the Probe will keep looking, it had 28 thrusters so must have been pretty big.

Here is a link to the Wiki page about the Probe, still cant see any size information.




Don't even have to stretch the imagination much, the shape does have some similarities, one of the anomalies you pointed out does look like the so called Monolith, but the second does look like a debris field, and if it did hit Phobos (Phobos II ) it does not have to have been completely destroyed, that was proven when they crashed a recent probe into an asteroid, and it was never their intention to do so, it kind of just bounced a little on impact.

If it does turn out to be Phobos II, then there will be a little excitement about it, you cant discover a 20 year old missing probe and it not be, especially when these Images have been looked at thousands of times and nobody noticed?

It does not fit in with the surrounding terrain, but size is everything where this is concerned, and that surely can be figured out, because we know the scale of the image I should imagine, and will find the probe dimensions, maybe all 3 anomalies, because there is a third to the lower right are the Probe and the two landers, but I'm reaching there, as for it being the Monolith, the location of that is well documented, so can be ruled out pretty quick. or confirmed either way.

Again great find.



reply posted on 19-10-2009 @ 04:46 PM by DaMod
reply to post by azzllin



I agree, this is very important even if it turns out to be our long lost Phobos II. That's pretty important news in itself!

Shouldn't we tell someone about this possible Phobos II sighting? I'm sure there are folks that would want to know.

[edit on 19-10-2009 by DaMod]


reply posted on 20-10-2009 @ 08:30 PM by Outlawstar
Hey guys, thanks for the support, Id also love to see some more input here, in the meantime, Id like to draw your attention to a couple more intruiging anomolies Ive come across in this image, first is these two little fellows which are directly SE of the previous "DebrisShip" anomaly, immediatly the similarity between these and the afformentioned anomaly becomes apparent, and dare I liken the furthest left anomaly to the "bitten dougnut" UFOs that NASAs STS videos have made so infamous.

Heres the first view.



And now further zoomed and picked out, I dare say very intriguing, Id love to hear some opinions on these.

And here we are even closer, note the scattered "debris" here too and how they are very similar to the anomaly, hmm.



Right now thats interesting enough, however unless Im mistaken and what Im about to show is a simply expainable phenomenon, in which case Id love it to be explained, but it seems Phobos is literally littered with "MiniMonoliths" almost like standing stones, discernible by their long shadows, Id really like to know what these are as even if the sun is at a low angle, perhaps hence the shadow length, these "objects" stick out like a sore thumb and are intriguingly aligned in some cases, I genuinly dont know what to make of these and would like some input.

Ive marked the seperate areas of interest here.



1.I found the GIZA-like alignment between these three "standing stones" particularly striking.

2.Here again we find another GIZA-like setup, mere coincidence? Note again the long shadows.


3.Heres a tantalizing trio, seemingly in Pyramid Formation, again if these are some sort of well known geological feature, Id love to know.


4. Heres another trio of "standing stones", this time in a more elongated triangle.


5.The differing shadow lengths on theses is quite intersting, hmm.

6.Hmm, am I clutching at straws with this one, its more contentious, however previous images really leave us no option other than to conlude that these are also "standing stones"


7.And finally(for now) this little guy all alone on the incline of a moon floating pecefully in the plenum of space.....hehe, shadow on this one is quite large too.




So to conclude.
If these really are artificial structures as the evidence I dare say seems to suggest, than it throws a new interesting light on the reason for a mission there perhaps, and the reason maybe for phobos 2's "accident".
Speculation I know, but we gotta start somewhere.

Id love to hear some thoughts on this captivating space rock!!!

Lay it on me.

Regards, Dan.

[edit on 20-10-2009 by Outlawstar]


Mod Note: IMPORTANT: New Policy Regarding Images On ATS – Review This Link.

[edit on Sat Oct 31 2009 by Jbird]



reply posted on 20-10-2009 @ 09:53 PM by sligtlyskeptical
reply to post by amari



Could you post a picture of what you came up with? This is pretty interesting. Almost look like communication towers to me. Is this where they film the show "Earth"?


reply posted on 21-10-2009 @ 10:29 PM by amari
Originally posted by sligtlyskeptical
reply to
post by amari



Could you post a picture of what you came up with? This is pretty interesting. Almost look like communication towers to me. Is this where they film the show "Earth"?


The Beings of Phobos filming Earth would be like a rerun of a closed loop bad

movie over and over again. Because this same bad movie has been played

over and over again through out the history of the Universes. ^Y^


reply posted on 23-10-2009 @ 02:28 AM by Titus7
Originally posted by dashar
reply to
post by Misfit



i dont bite when skeptics throw a view point over .
they are the people you meet in the pub you wouldnt normally talk to.
they love to argue and are arogant and blind to any other possibility and wont even spend time to study stuff.because in my opinion it dont fall in there comfort zone.

they remind me of pit ponys

very interesting photo

[edit on 18-10-2009 by dashar]


I completely agree.
The stories often include "a guy they know" who is "a whiz" in the field anyone is talking about.
They then are rather vague about things, or make bold claims and then attempt to impress upon you that if you do not listen to them and believe what they say, they might get offended and angry, and they'll yell at you. With words. It may even escalate to a fight.

e_e

I actually know a guy (lol) just like this. And his dad, too. e_e
It's just nothing but "I know a guy who is the foremost in his field." and then "/BOLD CLAIM FROM LEFT FIELD" although it's also usually some really old thing like "THERE WAS A GUY WHO MADE A CAR THAT RAN ON WATER. HE WAS A GENIUS. THE OIL COMPANIES WOULD HAVE NONE OF IT BECAUSE HE WAS SMARTER THAN THEM. THEY KILLED HIM. OOOOOOH. I'M IN THE KNOW. LOOK AT ME. REVERE ME. RAAAR."

Ugh.


reply posted on 16-11-2009 @ 09:20 PM by Aliensun
reply to post by Lichter daraus



Too bad we don't know the scale of the terrain. From the depressions that seem spread out to one end of the supposed object, I would guess--if pushed to guess--that the object is a crashed something--which could well be one of our triangle craft and that the depressions are where it tumbled as it came down. (Hence, no ETs involved and why we don't need rockets to fly to the Moon anymore [or want to] or even Mars!)

The regolith (dirt) on Phobos is assumed to be about 100 feet thick (or was that 100 meters?). Anyway, deep! Plus, the gravity is so small that a spacesuited human weights less than an ounce. (I'll look it up if pressed.) But you can throw a baseball into orbit, Sagan said!

But it would have been a very slow crash into the fluffy regolith.for it to be that. Any object of any speed would have bounced off unless it was a tens of thousands-miles-hour meteor with enough immense kinetic energy to burn itself a hole. Whatever, the holes near the object must be connected in some way to it because they are what the author Ivan Sanderson called in his ancient book OOPAs, Out Of Place Artifacts.



reply posted on 16-11-2009 @ 09:43 PM by Aliensun
reply to post by 2Faced



Actually, in looking at your blowup, the top image appears to me like a roundish nosecone-like structure protruding from one of the larger holes. That is a good trick to rotate an image of a space body to find the light angle that suits your brain's concept of light and shadow.

For the best sense of a scene, the light should be coming from above right, if possible, but above for sure. Many times I've been looking at Moon craters with the light wrong and my brain sees Hoagland's domes rather than craters. You don't think....Naw. He's smarter than that.


reply posted on 16-11-2009 @ 09:52 PM by Aliensun
reply to post by Outlawstar



You evidently have download the images of the seemingly "crash" scenes, and have mentioned changing contrasts, etc. Have you tried a trick that the astrophotographers use? They take multiple images of an astronomical object and then layer them one on top of the other. They do this to bring out diffeent details that the different camera settings allow. They they stack them and get great results that they could never get with any single image.

I'm not trying to just keep the thread running. Phobos is my ancesteral home. (joke!)
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Newfound "super-Earth"
  Posted 11 days ago with 56 member flags
Enceladus Backlit by Saturn
  Posted 5 days ago with 50 member flags
Toronto teens send Lego man into space: video
  Posted 19 days ago with 28 member flags
Current Potential Habitable Worlds - Update February 2012
  Posted 3 days ago with 26 member flags
Amazing new photo of Earth. The Blue Marble 2012
  Posted 15 days ago with 22 member flags
Stunning close view of Mercury
  Posted 3 days ago with 20 member flags
NASA Probe Captures 1st Video of Moon\'s Far Side
  Posted 12 days ago with 19 member flags