Here is the proposition:
Why send other people's children to do your fight? Why not fight yourself, two leaders, one on one, while the world watches.
I want to see Bush VS Osama, both assholes send other people's children to die for a useless battle which still hasn't ended and we still can't see
an end to it.
So why not find a new way of warfare. Do we have to stick to the same back-warded warfare, where it is all in all. Loose all or gain all? Why not
loose one? Why not send nethenyahoo to fight Khaled one on one. We all watch them two assholes rip each other to pieces.
One on one?
What do you think of the idea?
Share your thoughts.
Thanks for your time
ooz
|
Originally posted by oozyism
two leaders, one on one, while the world watches.
Hey ooz have you ever seen this before?
|
|
I am waiting for Tina Turner to officiate 
|
