reply to post by dragonridr
You are funny my friend. Perhaps you don’t understand it is not illegal to ship arms. You perhaps don’t understand it is not illegal for a
government to ship arms. Perhaps you think when the United States of America Ships arms we label the ship’s manifest as Mangos or something?
Arms are a commodity and the only thing that makes arms shipments to Hamas illegal is nations who have declared its illegal for their citizens or
businesses to do so.
If Iran has not declared it illegal then there would be no reason to hide what’s being shipped, just like when the United States ships arms all over
the world. They are itemized on the ship’s manifest otherwise the shippers could steal the arms and give the people who are expecting the arms
mangos, see how that works?
The fact that you are suffering from a deliberately distorted world view instilled in you by propaganda press sources does not mean other people such
as myself are not fully aware of logistics and the law and how things are really done versus how you imagine they are done.
Further I do not know whether Iran is or isn’t shipping arms to Hamas as I have seen no proof that says they are.
Obviously there is no such thing as proof someone hasn’t done anything, there can only be proof that someone has done something as doing something
creates a paper trail of facts and truth and not doing something creates nothing.
You are presenting nothing so therefore it is wise to assume innocence on the Iranians part until proved guilty of this offence which is only an
offence under some nation’s laws not all nation’s laws.
However having said that here in the United States if a man buys a gun from Wal-Mart and shoots his wife with that gun, Wal-Mart is not guilty of a
crime.
Guns don’t kill people, people kill people. Gun makers, retailers, wholesalers and shippers don’t kill people, people kill people.
Your argument is devoid any facts, it is all mere supposition garnered from media sources with a bias and a propaganda bent, no rational person whose
mind wasn’t filled with hate and a predisposed agenda would consider those media reports to be evidence of fact.
Once again it is precisely because I am not naïve that I need concrete hard facts to formulate opinions regarding culpability.
If you have any actual facts beyond why you simply imagine there are no facts please feel free to post them, but truly I don’t think you are doing
your argument any good by trying to establish it as fact when you have no facts to establish it as facts.
Intelligent, discerning and wise people want fact not suppositional emotional dogma and rhetoric.
Thanks.
[edit on 18/10/09 by ProtoplasmicTraveler]



