Plate Tectonics theory busted; Earth Expansion Theory shakes out better., page 1
privacy
Topic started on 16-10-2009 @ 09:16 PM by Historical-Mozart
The recent quaking activity going on in Yellowstone and down in Indonesia has gotten the attention of us at ATS. One of the Yellowstone threads is
the biggest thread in ATS' history, so the movements of our Earth certainly do get our attention, but our understandings of why/ how those movements
happen are outdated, for the most part.
It is widely accepted that the long-held Global Plate Tectonics Theory is what causes the plates to move, causes the earthquakes and shapes our continents as we know them. This theory is now debunked with the new and not-so-new scientific evidence that now shows that are beloved planet has nearly doubled in size in only about 250 million years, which is only, what, 5.5% of the history of our Earth.
Do you realize the implications of this? For 4.25 billion years (assuming the age of our Earth to be exactly 4.5 billion years old, for sake of this argument), Earth was a much-smaller planet with no huge oceans; then, suddenly, in just a short span of 250 million years, Earth expanded suddenly, adding in enormous oceans. That's like being a little 4-ft-tall kid until the age of 19.5 years old, then, suddenly, spurting up to about 5' 10" in just a half-year, in the time period from 19.5 years of age to 20 years of age.
As a primer, read up on the basics of the Global Tectonics Theory (note that this is a 20th-Century theory and, oftentimes, such old theories eventually are discarded in light of new, superior scientific evidence):
en.wikipedia.org...
In this article, beautifully written by James Maxlow, summarizes very nicely the challenge of the old Global Tectonic Plate theory and the promise of the new Earth Expansion Tectonics that is far more in line with the new scientific facts that have emerged from scientific inquiry.
www.tmgnow.com...
Here's a wonderful website that I was pleased to find; it's pages are easy-to-read written in layman's terms and the graphics show a lot of how our beautiful Earth has expanded significantly, (I must say that I disagree with their thesis that the expansion of Earth has "grave implications for the future of mankind"), to wit:
www.expanding-earth.org...
David Wilcock also has some Earth-shaking -- so to speak -- information about this topic and pay particular attention to his "Aetheric earthquake model", to quote:
divinecosmos.com...
Later on, Wilcock delves into the Earth Expansion Theory, supported by the evidence presented earlier in this post, to wit:
So, in the efforts to find out who we are and how we are connected to our Earth, it is vitally important for each of us to discard old theories that no longer are true and to supplant them with much-better, more accurate theories that are fully supported by the alternative science that has yet to be accepted by mainstream science.
As it often happens, new-theory-busting information moves many of us to be shaken AND stirred to find out the real truths that shake our realities as we know them.
It is widely accepted that the long-held Global Plate Tectonics Theory is what causes the plates to move, causes the earthquakes and shapes our continents as we know them. This theory is now debunked with the new and not-so-new scientific evidence that now shows that are beloved planet has nearly doubled in size in only about 250 million years, which is only, what, 5.5% of the history of our Earth.
Do you realize the implications of this? For 4.25 billion years (assuming the age of our Earth to be exactly 4.5 billion years old, for sake of this argument), Earth was a much-smaller planet with no huge oceans; then, suddenly, in just a short span of 250 million years, Earth expanded suddenly, adding in enormous oceans. That's like being a little 4-ft-tall kid until the age of 19.5 years old, then, suddenly, spurting up to about 5' 10" in just a half-year, in the time period from 19.5 years of age to 20 years of age.
As a primer, read up on the basics of the Global Tectonics Theory (note that this is a 20th-Century theory and, oftentimes, such old theories eventually are discarded in light of new, superior scientific evidence):
en.wikipedia.org...
Plate tectonics (from the Vulgar Latin tectonicus, meaning "building") is a theory which describes the large scale motions of Earth's lithosphere. The theory builds on the older concepts of continental drift, developed during the first decades of the 20th century by Alfred Wegener, and seafloor spreading, developed in the 1960s.
In this article, beautifully written by James Maxlow, summarizes very nicely the challenge of the old Global Tectonic Plate theory and the promise of the new Earth Expansion Tectonics that is far more in line with the new scientific facts that have emerged from scientific inquiry.
www.tmgnow.com...
Global tectonics was introduced a number of decades ago as an all embracing science that seeks to quantify and explain the Earth as a dynamic, interactive entity. As an outcome of this new philosophy we, in all our walks of life, have become accustomed to viewing the Earth globally, be it geology, ecology, climate, population, politics, and so on. Global tectonics however, in its strictest sense, must go beyond the present, or near present, i.e. human scale, and include the geological past, dating back to the formation of the Earth during the Archaean some 4,500,000,000 years ago, and all the Eons in between. In presenting Global Expansion Tectonics it must be realized that the global geological and geophysical database has only now reached the stage where any global tectonic hypotheses can be confidently quantified, challenged, and/or discarded.
Here's a wonderful website that I was pleased to find; it's pages are easy-to-read written in layman's terms and the graphics show a lot of how our beautiful Earth has expanded significantly, (I must say that I disagree with their thesis that the expansion of Earth has "grave implications for the future of mankind"), to wit:
www.expanding-earth.org...
The evidence is empirical and the conclusions are obvious—the Earth ~200-250 million years ago was a single planetary landmass ~40% smaller than it is today, and at that moment in geologic time there were NO OCEANS!
David Wilcock also has some Earth-shaking -- so to speak -- information about this topic and pay particular attention to his "Aetheric earthquake model", to quote:
An elongated hollow tube is discovered in the crust at the site of the explosion. Even more interestingly, and profitably, the inside of the tube is completely lined with diamonds! Normally it is believed that diamonds and other such crystals take untold thousands of years to be created, yet in these cases they appear to have formed instantaneously.
divinecosmos.com...
Later on, Wilcock delves into the Earth Expansion Theory, supported by the evidence presented earlier in this post, to wit:
With the new data in hand, the “plate tectonics ” model can now be discarded.
However, according to Maxlow and other sources, there are two main reasons for why the mainstream scientific and geological community does not accept an Earth Expansion Theory:
1. Matter is not “supposed to ” be able to expand in our current understandings of quantum physics.
2. The evidence needed to create a mathematical model that can accurately reproduce an Earth expansion process over time does not appear to exist.
The first point is effectively eliminated by the quantum models that we have discussed in this book, and Maxlow has provided the supportive evidence required for the second point.
As more and more information about the geophysics of the Earth is acquired, the Earth Expansion theory is only further enhanced in its credibility.
So, in the efforts to find out who we are and how we are connected to our Earth, it is vitally important for each of us to discard old theories that no longer are true and to supplant them with much-better, more accurate theories that are fully supported by the alternative science that has yet to be accepted by mainstream science.
As it often happens, new-theory-busting information moves many of us to be shaken AND stirred to find out the real truths that shake our realities as we know them.
reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 11:07 PM by Historical-Mozart
Originally posted by Keymaster1
Please go to nealadams.com for beautifully done video's explaining the REAL reasons for dinosaur extinction, earth creation/expansion etc.
*snip*
Also, go to understandearth.com, helpful!
Awesome url, Keymaster! I had forgotten about Neal Adam's site, but now it's bookmarked.
www.nealadams.com...
Get on his homepage; then click on "science" and then click on "Videos and Discussion", then click on "Press clip #0" and you'll get your first video tutorial.
I don't know if there is any narration or music, as I'm nearly deaf, so I don't bother with any sounds of any kind.
And this site...
understandearth.com...
...is an awesome one, also. New one for me, so I've bookmarked that one and I'm going right back to it to read up on it.
A big SHOUT-OUT to those who explored, discovered and shared the Earth Expansion Theory -- we have a debt of gratitude to all of you!
The truth of how our Earth grew is far better than the mainstream-accepted fiction, for sure!
reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 11:45 PM by calcoastseeker
That continent drift theory has always been weird if you ask me.I never could understand how seemly intelligent people believe that.
Even now with this posting there will be believers in subduction who will debate you and still believe the Grand Canyon was carved by water.
If the Universe is expanding then why wouldn't planets, solar systems and galaxies.
I believe the planet is in an expansion phase right now.
The rift valley in Africa is proof of that.
So is the large number of active volcanoes both on land and on the ocean floor.
Neal Adams has a number of animations that show this theory.
Don't take to much stock in much David Wilcock says on his website.
He also believes that dinosaurs are time travelers.
I subscribe to the USGS earthquake e-mail notification.
I have received numerous notifications of quakes and then later on an email that it was deleted after review by a seismologist.
When are earthquakes not true quakes? When it is magma movement.
The Japanese are very aware of this and of course our USGS is too.
They also know that the Yellowstone and Long Valley caldera magma chambers are connected.
Hot springs in the 2 areas register temp changes at the same time.
Many of the deleted quakes are in Nevada directly in line between Long Valley and Yellowstone.
The strange sounds heard in the northwest is indicative of strain on the crust and possibly magma movement.
The whole Puget Sound area is slowly pulling apart. So is the Columbia river area.
The water main breaks in the L.A. basin is also an indicator.
It is happening all over the U.S. and old pipes are being blamed.
But it is actually stress being applied deep underground.
In the mid west the strain extends from Missouri up the Mississippi/Ohio river valley through Illinois,Indiana, Ohio and extends up to and through the St. Lawrence seaway.
Look at historical quake history for proof.
Follow this link to this program,Seismic Eruptions.
Download it and install it. You can update it to recent quakes.
Play around with it and increase how fast the quakes happen.
There are drop down buttons that allow you to do this.
There is a pattern to earthquakes they are just so far apart in human time that they seem random.
But I believe they are not. The energy released in each quake travels around the globe creating another somewhere else.
There are points in the earth that some times it is accumulated until it has enough stored and then releases the energy.
Look at the Aleutian chain and mainland Alaska. That area is constantly shaking.
Puerto Rico and Virgin Island too.
The earth is expanding.
Even now with this posting there will be believers in subduction who will debate you and still believe the Grand Canyon was carved by water.
If the Universe is expanding then why wouldn't planets, solar systems and galaxies.
I believe the planet is in an expansion phase right now.
The rift valley in Africa is proof of that.
So is the large number of active volcanoes both on land and on the ocean floor.
Neal Adams has a number of animations that show this theory.
Don't take to much stock in much David Wilcock says on his website.
He also believes that dinosaurs are time travelers.
I subscribe to the USGS earthquake e-mail notification.
I have received numerous notifications of quakes and then later on an email that it was deleted after review by a seismologist.
When are earthquakes not true quakes? When it is magma movement.
The Japanese are very aware of this and of course our USGS is too.
They also know that the Yellowstone and Long Valley caldera magma chambers are connected.
Hot springs in the 2 areas register temp changes at the same time.
Many of the deleted quakes are in Nevada directly in line between Long Valley and Yellowstone.
The strange sounds heard in the northwest is indicative of strain on the crust and possibly magma movement.
The whole Puget Sound area is slowly pulling apart. So is the Columbia river area.
The water main breaks in the L.A. basin is also an indicator.
It is happening all over the U.S. and old pipes are being blamed.
But it is actually stress being applied deep underground.
In the mid west the strain extends from Missouri up the Mississippi/Ohio river valley through Illinois,Indiana, Ohio and extends up to and through the St. Lawrence seaway.
Look at historical quake history for proof.
Follow this link to this program,Seismic Eruptions.
Download it and install it. You can update it to recent quakes.
Play around with it and increase how fast the quakes happen.
There are drop down buttons that allow you to do this.
There is a pattern to earthquakes they are just so far apart in human time that they seem random.
But I believe they are not. The energy released in each quake travels around the globe creating another somewhere else.
There are points in the earth that some times it is accumulated until it has enough stored and then releases the energy.
Look at the Aleutian chain and mainland Alaska. That area is constantly shaking.
Puerto Rico and Virgin Island too.
The earth is expanding.
reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 01:56 AM by GORGANTHIUM
reply to post by Historical-Mozart
What about all the nuclear tests conducted in the pacific over the years by the United States and France.What kind of unknown damage did thoses exsplosions have on the Tectonic plates.There is very little infomation on this subject as its a hard to determin if any damage was done or not.
What about all the nuclear tests conducted in the pacific over the years by the United States and France.What kind of unknown damage did thoses exsplosions have on the Tectonic plates.There is very little infomation on this subject as its a hard to determin if any damage was done or not.
reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 02:04 AM by OmegaLogos
Disclaimer: I'm a theist but not of the Abrahamic faiths. I have minor biblical scholar and scriptural skills. Also I am not a scientific/legal or
medical expert in any field. Beware of my Contagious Memes! & watch out that you don't get cut on my Occams razor.All of this is my personal
conjecture and should not be considered the absolute or most definitive state of things as they really are. Use this information at your own risk! I
accept no liability if your ideology comes crashing down around you with accompanying consequences.
Explanation: 1stly No Star or Flag!
EPIC FAIL!
1stly I noticed the OP's myopia in regards to accurately assessing temporal states! For example, they imply that the theory in question is "outdated" and yet its less than 150yrs old and then they imply that 250million yrs is just a "short span" of time!
Do you realize the implications of this?
2ndly I noticed that the main evidence that the OP presents to suppport their argument is the www.expanding-earth.org website and they post a quote directly from there to wit: " The evidence is empirical and the conclusions are obvious—the Earth ~200-250 million years ago was a single planetary landmass ~40% smaller than it is today, and at that moment in geologic time there were NO OCEANS!"
This is totally promoting ignorance! HERE'S WHY!.....
Did Corals exist 500million yrs ago?
ANSWER: YES!
Do you realize the implications of this?
Personal Disclosure: Thanks for the opportunity to laugh myself silly at the poor quality of [psuedo]science attempted AND used as evidence for this alternate theory.
for the 
Explanation: 1stly No Star or Flag!
EPIC FAIL! 1stly I noticed the OP's myopia in regards to accurately assessing temporal states! For example, they imply that the theory in question is "outdated" and yet its less than 150yrs old and then they imply that 250million yrs is just a "short span" of time!
Do you realize the implications of this?
2ndly I noticed that the main evidence that the OP presents to suppport their argument is the www.expanding-earth.org website and they post a quote directly from there to wit: " The evidence is empirical and the conclusions are obvious—the Earth ~200-250 million years ago was a single planetary landmass ~40% smaller than it is today, and at that moment in geologic time there were NO OCEANS!"
This is totally promoting ignorance! HERE'S WHY!.....
Did Corals exist 500million yrs ago?
ANSWER: YES!
Do you realize the implications of this?
Personal Disclosure: Thanks for the opportunity to laugh myself silly at the poor quality of [psuedo]science attempted AND used as evidence for this alternate theory.
for the reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 03:21 AM by Historical-Mozart
Originally posted by OmegaLogos
Explanation: 1stly No Star or Flag!
Well I am very surprised that, at this point, there not yet any stars or flags on this thread...yet. Why? Epic fail? Hardly! There is a LOT of accurate science to back up my positions that I have made in my post.
1stly I noticed the OP's myopia in regards to accurately assessing temporal states! For example, they imply that the theory in question is "outdated" and yet its less than 150yrs old and then they imply that 250million yrs is just a "short span" of time!
"Short" in terms of geological time, not human time!
2ndly I noticed that the main evidence that the OP presents to suppport their argument is the www.expanding-earth.org website and they post a quote directly from there to wit: " The evidence is empirical and the conclusions are obvious—the Earth ~200-250 million years ago was a single planetary landmass ~40% smaller than it is today, and at that moment in geologic time there were NO OCEANS!"
I agree that the term "NO OCEANS!" was a very poor use of words on their part. Take a close look at what I said: Earth was a much-smaller planet with no huge oceans;
I said the underlined above because I disagreed with the quoted part from the Expanding-Earth site, as I knew for certain that there WERE oceans, but that they were SHALLOW oceans... in which coral was able to form.
Take a look at this that I just now found...
animals.howstuffworks.com...
...and see how CLOSELY the existence of the corals match up with the shallow seas that existed when the Earth was far smaller. Take a close look -- it's a perfect matchup! Watch those Expanding-Earth vids and see how the shallow seas line up with the presently-existing coral reefs.
Far from busting the Expanding Earth Theory, you have helped me support it, so I thank you, OmegaLogos, for helping my cause here.
As to the S&F, beats me why there has been a dearth of them so far in the start, but, as people realize the accuracy of the science behind the Expanding Earth Theory, the S&F will come in, I'm sure.
I dare anyone to match up the old Global Plate Tectonics theory against the Expanding Earth Theory any day. Trust me, the old Global Tectonics Theorists will be shaken badly, very badly, due to the lack of accurate science to back up their theory and to the sheer abundance of accurate science to back up the Expanding Earth Theory.
reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 04:07 AM by OmegaLogos
reply to post by Historical-Mozart
Disclaimer: As above!
Explanation: From the website you provided as evidence I noticed this speculation "This whole area, like other areas of the United States, was once covered by water, forming a shallow epicontinental sea, so one can assume the cataclysm that caused the breakup of Pangaea and formation of the Pacific Ocean basin ~200 Ma offered a lower elevation into which this shallow sea could run off—thus eroding and creating the Grand Canyon." [Note: Bold is my edited emphansis! ]
And just to clear up any speculation I provide this as evidence.....
Grand Canyon [wiki]
Specifically "The canyon was created by the Colorado River over a 5.4 million year period. The canyon is 277 miles (446 km) long, ranges in width from 4 to 18 miles (6.4 to 29 km) and attains a depth of over a mile (1.83 km) (6000 feet).[1] Nearly two billion years of the Earth's geological history have been exposed as the Colorado River and its tributaries cut their channels through layer after layer of rock while the Colorado Plateau was uplifted. The "canyon began in the west, followed by another that formed in the east. Eventually, the two broke through and met as a single majestic rent in the earth, more commonly referred to as the "Grand Canyon Event" approximately 5.4 million years ago. [...] The merger apparently occurred where the river today bends to the west, in the area known as the Kaibab Arch."[2] The major form of the canyon was created by this event. The Colorado River continued to erode and form the canyon to the point we see it as today.[3]"
Personal Disclosure: Are you starting to get the picture that the website your thread relies on has no scientific merit due to its claimed
evidence not standing up to any kind of real scrutiny! How are you feeling about that dare you dared?
Disclaimer: As above!
Explanation: From the website you provided as evidence I noticed this speculation "This whole area, like other areas of the United States, was once covered by water, forming a shallow epicontinental sea, so one can assume the cataclysm that caused the breakup of Pangaea and formation of the Pacific Ocean basin ~200 Ma offered a lower elevation into which this shallow sea could run off—thus eroding and creating the Grand Canyon." [Note: Bold is my edited emphansis!
] And just to clear up any speculation I provide this as evidence.....
Grand Canyon [wiki]
Specifically "The canyon was created by the Colorado River over a 5.4 million year period. The canyon is 277 miles (446 km) long, ranges in width from 4 to 18 miles (6.4 to 29 km) and attains a depth of over a mile (1.83 km) (6000 feet).[1] Nearly two billion years of the Earth's geological history have been exposed as the Colorado River and its tributaries cut their channels through layer after layer of rock while the Colorado Plateau was uplifted. The "canyon began in the west, followed by another that formed in the east. Eventually, the two broke through and met as a single majestic rent in the earth, more commonly referred to as the "Grand Canyon Event" approximately 5.4 million years ago. [...] The merger apparently occurred where the river today bends to the west, in the area known as the Kaibab Arch."[2] The major form of the canyon was created by this event. The Colorado River continued to erode and form the canyon to the point we see it as today.[3]"
Personal Disclosure:
Are you starting to get the picture that the website your thread relies on has no scientific merit due to its claimed
evidence not standing up to any kind of real scrutiny! How are you feeling about that dare you dared? 
Fail.reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 05:06 AM by quackers
reply to post by paranoiaFTW
It is also impossible for a bumble bee to fly, what is your point?
[edit on 17-10-2009 by quackers]
[edit on 17-10-2009 by quackers]
[edit on 17-10-2009 by quackers]
It is also impossible for a bumble bee to fly, what is your point?
[edit on 17-10-2009 by quackers]
[edit on 17-10-2009 by quackers]
[edit on 17-10-2009 by quackers]
reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 05:12 AM by OmegaLogos
reply to post by paranoiaFTW
Disclaimer: As elsewhere!
Explanation: Nope! EPIC FAIL!
The earth does expand..just not 40% in 1/4 billion years under the influence of quantum forces that the OP is promoting!
There is accretion occuring! It works out to about 50 metric tons of space originating influx of debris/mass to the planet daily!
Also the continental plates both rise and sink under the pressure [or via the lack] of massive ice sheets during the various ice ages and thaws!
Finally there are places at the boundaries of some plates that actually are expanding away from each other [mid atlantic ridge for example] but of course this expansion is coped with by subduction elsewhere!
Personal Disclosure: Ever heard of a volcano creating MORE land! 
Disclaimer: As elsewhere!
Explanation: Nope! EPIC FAIL!
The earth does expand..just not 40% in 1/4 billion years under the influence of quantum forces that the OP is promoting!
There is accretion occuring! It works out to about 50 metric tons of space originating influx of debris/mass to the planet daily!
Also the continental plates both rise and sink under the pressure [or via the lack] of massive ice sheets during the various ice ages and thaws!
Finally there are places at the boundaries of some plates that actually are expanding away from each other [mid atlantic ridge for example] but of course this expansion is coped with by subduction elsewhere!
Personal Disclosure:
Ever heard of a volcano creating MORE land! reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 05:17 AM by quackers
reply to post by OmegaLogos
So you put blind faith in science just because the majority believes in an unproven theory (a theory which itself was scoffed at by the likes of yourself for many many years before it was finaly accepted)? Not only that but your penchant for dogma automatically makes you exclude any other theory, even though said theories are also unproven. Is the Grand Canyon 5.4 million years old? Or is it as some now thing 17 million years old. If the scientific community started to believe it was 50 million years old would you stick to your wiki article or would your opinion change as soon as someone updated it?
Don't question, accept everything your told, promote ignorance.
So you put blind faith in science just because the majority believes in an unproven theory (a theory which itself was scoffed at by the likes of yourself for many many years before it was finaly accepted)? Not only that but your penchant for dogma automatically makes you exclude any other theory, even though said theories are also unproven. Is the Grand Canyon 5.4 million years old? Or is it as some now thing 17 million years old. If the scientific community started to believe it was 50 million years old would you stick to your wiki article or would your opinion change as soon as someone updated it?
Don't question, accept everything your told, promote ignorance.
reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 05:42 AM by OmegaLogos
reply to post by quackers
Disclaimer: As elsewhere!
Explanation: Blind faith? In science? NOPE! I have tested the Kuhnian paradigm with a view to Poppers methods of falsifying it, that is, the theory of plate tectonics ,and I have found out emprically for myself that the evidence provided for it is quite robust!
Conversely the evidence that the OP relies on is coming from a website that is presenting assumtions as fact and it hasn't stood up too well against my Occams razor!
Personal Disclosure: You post ad hominens me several times and I ask that you kindly retract them, especially the statement implying that I support "Don't question, accept everything your told, promote ignorance." which is not what I posted at all! Seems your posts rabid pathos has had a go at my ethos! Lets keep this in the realm of logos OK!
Disclaimer: As elsewhere!
Explanation: Blind faith? In science? NOPE! I have tested the Kuhnian paradigm with a view to Poppers methods of falsifying it, that is, the theory of plate tectonics ,and I have found out emprically for myself that the evidence provided for it is quite robust!
Conversely the evidence that the OP relies on is coming from a website that is presenting assumtions as fact and it hasn't stood up too well against my Occams razor!
Personal Disclosure: You post ad hominens me several times and I ask that you kindly retract them, especially the statement implying that I support "Don't question, accept everything your told, promote ignorance." which is not what I posted at all! Seems your posts rabid pathos has had a go at my ethos! Lets keep this in the realm of logos OK!
Volcano in Iceland Erupting Alongside The Aurora Borealis (pics)
Posted 7 days ago with 121 member flags
Posted 7 days ago with 121 member flags
West Coast USA: Pay Attention, Cascadia May Be Ready to Rupture
Posted 8 days ago with 87 member flags
Posted 8 days ago with 87 member flags
Newest topics, updated in real-time:
Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 14 hours ago, 40 flags
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 14 hours ago, 40 flags
CPAC; Ron Paul won 2 years in a row; they change to electronic voting and he comes in 4th today?
US Political Madness, Posted 12 hours ago, 32 flags
US Political Madness, Posted 12 hours ago, 32 flags
Book of Thoth. Secret Societies. truth seekers This is a good read!
Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 14 hours ago, 21 flags
Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 14 hours ago, 21 flags
ATS Live: 96: Super powers, Falklands Woes, Stan Deyo Interview, Syria, Telepathy, The Devils Chord.
ATS Live, Posted 15 hours ago, 19 flags
ATS Live, Posted 15 hours ago, 19 flags
Protests Planned for 'Child Witch-Hunting' Preacher Headed to US for 'Deliverance' Tour
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 10 hours ago, 11 flags
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 10 hours ago, 11 flags
Exclusive: Marines Nazi-Flag Whistleblower Comes Forward
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 9 hours ago, 9 flags
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 9 hours ago, 9 flags
Maine GOP Chairman: Any Caucus Votes After Tonight Won't Count Towards Total
Breaking Political News, Posted 6 hours ago, 9 flags
Breaking Political News, Posted 6 hours ago, 9 flags
Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:
First thread, Possible Ghost picture I took myself, Would appreciate your opinion on this.
Paranormal Studies, Posted 15 hours ago, 77 replies
Paranormal Studies, Posted 15 hours ago, 77 replies
Mystery of the Masonic "hunnerts o' times" language of Orphan Annie
Secret Societies, Posted 8 hours ago, 51 replies
Secret Societies, Posted 8 hours ago, 51 replies
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 14 hours ago, 45 replies
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 14 hours ago, 45 replies
The Politics of ‘Star Trek’: ‘Patterns of Force’
Political Ideology, Posted 15 hours ago, 36 replies
Political Ideology, Posted 15 hours ago, 36 replies
Exclusive: Marines Nazi-Flag Whistleblower Comes Forward
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 9 hours ago, 33 replies
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 9 hours ago, 33 replies
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.325 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.325 seconds
