Women's right (forgetting the men), page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 09:41 AM by poedxsoldiervet
reply to post by oozyism



We are men, we deal with it, we dont run and cry about our rights, 9 times out of 10 a women is much better at the hands on aspect of taking care of the kids, we are better at other things. Balance of nature.


reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 07:42 PM by oozyism
reply to post by vkey08





I think my point was why do we even need rights groups to begin with, women's , men's or purple people eater's.....

We need rights because humans are no doubt animals, and they have their instincts. Mix instincts with emotions we have humans, a very bad combination, I guess that is the reason why they decided to have laws.

Why do we need wo/men rights? I guess the same reason why we need human rights.

Although these groups are not necessary, as you point out, either neither groups should exist, or both should to create a balance. Without that balance you can expect man's rights to be diminished.

Of curse diminished is a far stretch, but if we have a good think we would come to the conclusion that if one group exists alone then that group would have no competition, just like a judge with no lawyers. Competition is needed, or no competition at all.

I guess your point is no competition which I agree with also.

Thanks for your time

ooz
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Memorial day thoughts.
  Posted 3 days ago with 11 member flags
Global governance and the challenge to the American Constitution
  Posted 11 days ago with 5 member flags
Abraham Lincoln Filed a Patent for "Facebook\' in 1845..? (HOAX)
  Posted 19 days ago with 3 member flags
Explosive Scoop on Obama from Breitbart.com
  Posted 10 days ago with 1 member flags