Glenn Beck :: The Radical Truth About Anita Dunn, page 2

privacy

Pages: << 1 2 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 25 times

reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 07:02 PM by littlebunny

Originally posted by Shades1035

Well, maybe you're just upset because the president is black.. because the facts remain. Democrats are not communists. It's just stupid to claim that. Just admit you're racist and come clean.....

That statement above has got to be one of the dumbest damn things I have read in a long time... But it shows yet again just how low of character and how low a conviction these socialists have... They know what they believe is nothing short of pure evil, so what do they do if you disagree with them and point out just how disgusting and evil their beliefs truly are... they call you a racist!

That card has been pulled so many times by these evil socialist it means nothing anymore, absolutely nothing!

BTW I will openly admit I Absolutely HATE SOCIALISM with every ounce of my body and soul! I HATE IT! I wonder if that makes me a racist, no no... a terrorist... that's what they'll start calling all who disagree with them next... no no... a racist terrorist... now that sounds scary!

Stop with the name calling, either defend your point of view without calling people names or just sit down and let the grownups talk.

Regarding the OP...

I can't believe these people are openly telling the world they are devote socialist... I believe if these types of speeches and attempted socialist laws continue, we will be in a full blown civil war before the end of President Obama's first term... I hope instead these people realize they are pushing to hard to fast and back off.... They need one more cycle (generation) of life before they can do all they want.... As it stands, if they don't stop war this way comes... That scares me on so many levels, but not nearly has much as living on my knees!

--Charles Marcello

[edit on 17-10-2009 by littlebunny]

reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 07:42 PM by conspiracyrus

I dont like glenn beck ... truthfully its his face and whiny voice... he really is pathetic... BUT that doesnt change the fact that Mao Zedong is directly responsible for millions of deaths... no scratch that 10's of millions So i would say that if you look to Mao for advice your a pretty despicable person

reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 08:17 PM by DJM8507

The right conservative wing is as fanatical and doing things just as extreme. I suppose the difference is that they don't hide it...

reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 08:22 PM by PenandSword

reply to post by jibeho

He is not reflecting his past. He is reflecting the present and future of America, Komrade. Da? Niet?

reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 11:49 PM by fockewulf190

Originally posted by TheAmazingK
reply to post by Shades1035

That makes me laugh what good, just so you know. Here I am, thinking to myself that I am far freer than any American, and I live in a Mao-ist dictatorship!

But seriously. Those leaders many in here are spouting about, yeah, they were pretty awful. However, isn't "mao-ist" China the ones holding all your IOU's? Isn't Mao the one who loked you in the face 50 years ago, and said: "Wait and see. We'll industralize so fast, so well, you won't even know what hit you,"? Obviously, they knew how to do it better than you after all. Is that what you're so sore about?

How could anyone think someone who idealizes parts of a leaders regime is some horrible hag witch undeserving of the position she has worked hard to attain? Because, judging by the current results, Mao won. While alot of highly questionable things happened along the way in order to get the system he envisioned in place, he did it. Can Americans truly say, with no doubt in their hearts, that the US today is everything its founding fathers (and mothers) envisioned it to be?

Well, well...with such a philosophy you may go far working for the Obamination Administration. I could picture your resume getting an approving nod from the gatekeeper Ron Emanuel himself. Or should I say hellhound?

reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 01:00 AM by nenothtu

Originally posted by Shades1035

Originally posted by Mr Poopra
People can say what they will about Beck, the facts are he is exposing Obama and his cronies for the radicals they are. I would've laughed him off the stage a couple years ago. I cannot believe the route my country has taken lately and NO ONE is reporting it but him.

Well, maybe you're just upset because the president is black.. because the facts remain. Democrats are not communists. It's just stupid to claim that. Just admit you're racist and come clean.....

OH NOES! you DIDN'T play THAT worn out, used up haggard gambit that the left uses when it's got NOTHING valid to respond with!

Ya showed yer cards, dude!

reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 01:03 AM by dthwraith

Thanks for posting this, it's opened my eyes to some ugly things. I'm passing it on to everyone I know. This is our country and its going to hell while we all watch, it makes me sad and sick. I wonder how much longer before the people snap?

reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 01:12 AM by Mr Poopra

Click here for more information.

reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 01:20 AM by corusso

I think Beck is a moron.
No real reason, just saying.

reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 01:21 AM by TheAmazingK

reply to post by fockewulf190

What philosophy is that exactly?

We all admire different people, for different reasons. Some people admire Glenn Beck. Others think he is an air-headed doucheball with nothing worthwhile existing in his head. Whatever.
The point of the matter is, we admire traits and dislike traits in individuals. I dislike that Mao achieved his goverment through force and subterfuge. I admire that he crafted a system that worked.
I admire the founding fathers of the US for trying to craft their own system that would benefit all, but I dislike those who still vainly cling to those long past ideals, instead of thinking of new ways to progress and solve problems.
I dislike Obama for not really sticking to his highly prized word, but I admire him for shouldering the responsibilities left by a truly incompetent forebear.
Do you see the difference?
I dislike Glenn Beck becuase I, personallly, don't agree with his ideologies or methods, but I admire those who stick to their convictions. And Beck certainly does that, at the very least.

reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 01:58 AM by Styki

reply to post by DrMattMaddix

Ok, just wait till a republican is in office. Good ol Glenn will be singing the fine toon and marching to the beat.

reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 02:21 AM by Digital_Reality

Mao Tse-tung is a murdering pig. Anyone who says he is somehow a part of their decision making or uses him as an example whether it be a Republican or a Democrat has the same filthy soul.
Nothing else matters, who cares what the cover story is...

Wake up! They are not even hiding it anymore.

reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 02:57 AM by ibegood2

Do people forget what we did to the unarmed,women and children in germany? how about the 4 million we killed in korea, a third of them children. or the 2 million in viet nam? or better yet the backing of israel who is on a mission to extermanat the lebanese while we as a country supply them blindly, and allowed plans for nukes to get in there hands! NO ONE NATION can say they are perfect anymore. the only thing we can do is work together for a comprimise.

reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 02:59 AM by Digital_Reality

Know what is confusing?
Remember the peacefull protesters that marched on Washington last month, you know the ones that cleaned up after they left. They had signs with crossed out swastikas to protest AGAINST Nazi like ideas. Well the media totally twisted that and made it look like they were the Nazis.

Now she gets up there and mentions Mao and mother Teresa with the same breath and says how she idolizes Mao for making a quote about him "fighting his own fight" and Glen is taken it out of context and somehow its propaganda. LoL

Nice try. No wait, actually its a weak ass try.

[edit on 17-10-2009 by Digital_Reality]

reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 04:21 AM by demonseed

Originally posted by pluckynoonez
reply to post by DrMattMaddix

Glenn Beck has very little to do with "reporting"

www.colbertnation.com...

Just sayin'.

plucky

[edit on 16-10-2009 by pluckynoonez]

I lost all respect for Colbert when i saw that. Was never a huge fan anyway but you could tell he ran out of ideas.

Theres plenty of news reporting going on on all news stations why attack the one guy who is actually searching for truth?(even if he's faking, which i doubt).

I, personally, think Beck is distraught at what's going on around him and is acting this way because of it. Thats how normal people react to this kind of situation.

In a way its funny. Fox News is struggling for ratings and Glenn is currently one of their highest rated shows, quickly catching up to O'reilly.

Im not going to go out on a limb and say Beck is going to save America, but remember he was one of the few news casters to actually support Ron Paul rather than smear him.

I think Beck actually cares for our futures unlike the other Bobble heads. He may be a bit emotional but thats a good thing these days.

As for the piece. Was he out there?
I would say No.

Anita literally said one of her "favorite philosophers" is Mao. Glenn is right here. See, quoting an evil dictator to make a point is one thing.
"The loss of one life, is a tragedy. The loss of millions, is a statistic." -Stalin

That quote is very true. Using it would not make one a bad person. Now picture yourself using that quote and saying, "To quote one of my favorite philosophers, Joseph Stalin."

Just because Mao wasn't as bad as Stalin or Hitler does not change the fact he was an evil person.

reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 04:27 AM by demonseed

Originally posted by TheAmazingK
reply to post by fockewulf190

What philosophy is that exactly?

We all admire different people, for different reasons. Some people admire Glenn Beck. Others think he is an air-headed doucheball with nothing worthwhile existing in his head. Whatever.
The point of the matter is, we admire traits and dislike traits in individuals. I dislike that Mao achieved his goverment through force and subterfuge. I admire that he crafted a system that worked.
I admire the founding fathers of the US for trying to craft their own system that would benefit all, but I dislike those who still vainly cling to those long past ideals, instead of thinking of new ways to progress and solve problems.
I dislike Obama for not really sticking to his highly prized word, but I admire him for shouldering the responsibilities left by a truly incompetent forebear.
Do you see the difference?
I dislike Glenn Beck becuase I, personallly, don't agree with his ideologies or methods, but I admire those who stick to their convictions. And Beck certainly does that, at the very least.

Well for starters, America's government is one of the best built free governments today. The only problem is, the people deserve the government they get. And Sadly enough, nobody is realizing this.

And second, admiring people for certain traits is one thing. But their philosophies?

Think about that for a second....

I mean you could call Hitler handsome(not that he is, just an example) but that would not be anywhere as close to admiring him as a philosopher..

Philosophies and traits are two completely different ball parks.

reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 04:37 AM by AnonymousMoose

Originally posted by Styki
reply to post by DrMattMaddix

Ok, just wait till a republican is in office. Good ol Glenn will be singing the fine toon and marching to the beat.

I hope not...we must question all authority no matter who's in office...even if Ron Paul were president! No man is immune to corruption and greed

reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 03:09 PM by Mr Poopra

Originally posted by Styki
reply to post by DrMattMaddix

Ok, just wait till a republican is in office. Good ol Glenn will be singing the fine toon and marching to the beat.

Well good thing Beck is an Independent, huh? You've obviously never watched or listened to his show because he exposed Bush just as much. He gives a bipartisan ass kicking which is good.

reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 05:53 PM by nenothtu

reply to post by Mr Poopra

They carry on so because they've got nothing. Can't attack the message, because it is what it is. At least they've wised up enough to not attempt to refute obvious facts, backed up by evidence.

So, since they CAN'T attack the message, they light out after the messenger instead. Their attacks on the messenger are largely of no effect, because they know not whereof they speak, and just try to pull labels out of their butts and paste them on.

Unfortunately for them, without a valid argument against the message, the sticky stuff on the labels just doesn't work.

Pages: << 1 2 >> ^^TOP^^