It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by whatukno
What would happen is they would stop the trial to have you tested to see if your mentally competent to stand trial.
If you are found competent, you would get the maximum penalty if found guilty for wasting the courts time.
If your found incompetent to stand trial, it's one flew over the cuckoo's nest time.
If you did not kill anyone in a premediated or cold blooded fashion. If you did not steal anything from anyone else. If you did not commit Treason...
You have not broken any Constitutional Law. The other 600,000 codes on the book are simply wishful thinking of a Dictatorial Military/Corporate Dictatorship looking to profit off the backs of the decieved citizens.
Originally posted by autowrench
"Are we on the record?"
"Yes, your Honor, I am the beneficiary of the Trust.
As the beneficiary, I now appoint you, Judge XXX as Trustee of my Trust."
As Trustee of my Trust, I hereby instruct you, Judge XXX, to expunge the record of this court of any and all documentation concerning me, and that my name be stricken from these records."
Further, Judge XXX, I instruct you, as Trustee of my Trust, to pay me, from the court fund, X amount, for my time and effort in appearing in this venue."
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
reply to post by whatukno
Oops too late friend. Take my advice don't get a lawyer and learn some Latin and the law!
They will not put you in the loony bin, they instead shake your hand and respectfully wish you well as you head out the door.
The United States Congress legally disbanded in 1861 friend and was never legally called back into session per it's own Constitutional Rules since.
Nothing passed into law since 1861 has any Constitutional validity.
It's all a De Facto War Time Government and Corporate Contract Law.
Congress has no right to pass any law that impinges on your individual sovereignty or right to self determination with 600,000 laws on the books and counting they all impinge on your individual sovereignty and right to self determination.
You only live this life once my friend. You get points for living it large and thinking big, not for living it small and thinking small.
Break out of that box you are in! The air is fine out here.
[edit on 1/11/09 by ProtoplasmicTraveler]
Originally posted by nwodeath
Originally posted by finnegan
Originally posted by nwodeath
Do the terms and words used in law have different meaning than those in English language?
Judge: Well, yes they do. [That is the only answer he can give]
[edit on 16-10-2009 by nwodeath]
I'm not very educated with laws most everything I know is from someone's interpretation of the law unless I have to look up some city code.
I was wondering if in this scenario the judge would say "no, the meanings are the same"
Now at this point you can't argue with a judge or he could hold you in contempt I think. So then the case would have to play out and then an appeal filed, but then the appeal could just get thrown out without being looked at or the next judge may say the first was correct.
He cannot say the meanings are the same. If he does, that's a "reversible error" on appeal. Its procedural misconduct, and it's completely reversible, provided that you do not sit on your rights.