Real racism or just the racism card?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 16-10-2009 @ 04:17 AM by theyreadmymind
Whenever I'm in the car I like to listen to talk radio, but the only talk radio I can get is right-wing radio. Now I'm non-partisan for the most part, but I must say I've become very sensitive, through no real fault of my own, to what I feel are a majority of mistruths from the right. Especially since George Bush years. So much so that it's actually been pushing me left. So let that just be my disclaimer. I didn't set out to be left, but I just can't stand liars and I hear it coming more from the right than anyone.

I've been hearing a lot on the radio about how the right is being labeled as racists all the time by the left and how horrible they are because of it. But aside from a few random Joes on the Internet, I haven't really heard anyone calling Republicans racist. So who is the right-wing MSM upset about? And I really hope it's from mainstream sources, and not just some nobodies on the Internet because if that is the case I'm going to have to believe they're just playing the racism card to be the innocent victim. The MSM should not be upset because some nobodies on the Internet are calling them racist. They never give us the time of day any other time.

Now I do hear this a lot on the Internet too, that people are tired of being called racist. I just saw a thread about it. And I rarely hear anyone call people racist on the Internet unless they're really acting racist. Recently it was something about Jews. But you sort of expect that from people on the Internet. I don't expect it from people on talk radio or in the MSM unless they can back this up with sources. So I ask you, who is making all the racist accusations and why haven't I heard it?

Just because I know the first thing you do before you ask a question is Google it, I decided to go and Google this to see who was making the accusations and what I found out was actually quite startling. Now I know this is not any kind of scientific test, but what do you think of these results?

Google results:

"Republicans are racist" - 10,300 pages
"Democrats are racist" - 230,000 pages
"Republicans are not racist" - 274,000 pages
"Democrats are not racist" - 233,000 pages

Now, like I said this is not a scientific test by any means. But just from a totally random selection of results, it does seem like there's a good possibility of the following.

1. Very few people are calling Republicans racist
2. A lot of people are calling Democrats racist
3. An overwhelmingly improportionate amount of Republicans are complaining about being called racist who are not (Over 2600%!)
4. An equal amount of Democrats are complaining about being called racist who are being called racist

Now what do you think of this? Is something going on here or is it just me? Who are the Republicans barking about? I don't get it.


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 06:18 AM by mikerussellus
reply to post by theyreadmymind



As a political wonk, I have seen it quite a bit. It was used early on, if you disagreed with a policy of Obama's, and the left couldn't argue it well, they then resorted to pulling the race card.

It was quite common early on. Even here on ATS, but I see it being used less, just because it was so over-used.

Heck, I've been called a racist more THIS YEAR, than in all time of my aged long life of 46 years.


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 06:45 AM by j2000
reply to post by theyreadmymind



Your results did not seem to refect what was going on here lately in the world. Dems getting called racists the most by 20 fold? hahaha


"Republicans are racist" - 10,300 pages
"Democrats are racist" - 230,000 pages
"Republicans are not racist" - 274,000 pages
"Democrats are not racist" - 233,000 pages

Here are the terms were it comes up the most.

"Conservatives are racist" - 832,000 pages
"Tea Party are racists" - 56,000 pages

Just sayin...............



reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 06:56 AM by grover
reply to post by j2000


Like the OP said those aren't scientific numbers.

It merely reflects what is being posted on line. I am certain if you had looked during the bush minor years you would find different numbers.


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 06:57 AM by mikerussellus
reply to post by grover



All I did was google racist ads run by democrats

just a sample
www.soundpolitics.com...

blogs.nashvillescene.com...

www.amazon.com...


The hardest thing to overcome, the stereo-type of race, is CONSTANTLY emphasized by the left.

Black Caucus this, black history month this, black history month that, black pride, black america, african-american, afro-american.

Cut it out!!!

The reason there is still so much emphasis is because of black liberals. Imagine if everyone stopped being racist.

Jesse Jackson would be out of a fracking job.

Whites, you've been forgiven. Get over the guilt.
Blacks, we've come a long way baby, time now to move forward. Whites aren't going to do it for us. Only we can.

I get so tired of this. . . .


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 07:20 AM by j2000
Originally posted by grover
reply to
post by j2000


Like the OP said those aren't scientific numbers.

It merely reflects what is being posted on line. I am certain if you had looked during the bush minor years you would find different numbers.


I don't remember being called a racists in the Bush, Clinton, Bush, Regan years for fighting against big Govt.

This time around, the Govt expansion has gone crazy and so have the empty accussations of racisim. Of course along with other things like facists, etc.

The level of freedom that is being highjacked from us right now and since the Patriot Act is unbelievable.
Unless someone stands up to the Govt, most all will be given away and we will be in a bondage state of labor.
When the thought of getting away and living off the land, costs too much to think about, something is very wrong.

I want to work hard, save money, pay for things as I get them and not borrow. They keep coming for more and more and giving my money to the wealthy and the poor for things they either do not need, or won't work for.
Now I am a racists. How the hell does that figure?


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 07:31 AM by poedxsoldiervet
reply to post by grover



umm I do not think you are stated the truth there, Dixiecrats did not bolt to the Repiblican party.... Here is a Question what memeber of Congress use to be KKK member but is now a US Senator?

Answer Robery Byrd Democrat...


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 07:35 AM by Hazelnut
reply to post by JJay55



And how many television series shows can we watch about racism?

CSI last night for example. A white cop guns down a black cop and the entire show examines racism. Sheesh, can't get away from the stuff! Social engineering at work. Watch and learn folks.


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 07:45 AM by poedxsoldiervet
reply to post by Hazelnut



That was a good show, and go figure its the black CSI that shows he wasn’t a racists-)

I hate the fact that 40 years after the Civil rights act, that we still talk about this nonsense. I have been called a racists and just laugh and trot out my nieces and nephews, My dad and his three daughters, so hey if I am a racists then I guess I hate my family-) And after I point out this fact Liberals usually resort to more name calling-) God I love it.


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 08:16 AM by grover
reply to post by poedxsoldiervet



You are the one who is misinformed:


www.u-s-history.com...

They (the Dixiecrats...my parenthesis) remained in the Democratic fold, restive, until the candidacy of Republican conservative Barry Goldwater liberated them in 1964 by refreshing some of the Dixiecrat ideologies and therefore accelerated the transition from a solid South for the Democrats to one for the Republicans. Strom Thurmond switched to the Republican Party that year and remained there until his death in December 2003.

Other presidential candidates, such as Republican Richard M. Nixon in 1968, have effectively used the Southern strategy of "states' rights" and racial inequality to garner votes from the racially conservative electorate in the southern states.



www.georgiaencyclopedia.org...

Although the Dixiecrats immediately dissolved after the 1948 election, their impact lasted much longer. Many white voters who initially cast Dixiecrat ballots gravitated back toward the Democratic Party only grudgingly, and they remained nominal Democrats at best. Ultimately, the Dixiecrat movement paved the way for the rise of the modern Republican Party in the South. Many former Dixiecrat supporters eventually became Republicans, as was highlighted by Strom Thurmond's conversion in the 1960s.


In summary while what was known in 1948 as the Dixiecrat party returned to the Democratic fold over the course of the 60's many of its supporters followed Strom Thurmond to the Republican party paving the way for the rise of the GOP in the south and the decline of the Democratic party there...

and that migration paved the way for the GOP southern strategy which included using racially divisive rhetoric and propaganda.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
  Posted 18 days ago with 21 member flags
Study says racists and conservatives are dumb
  Posted 8 days ago with 16 member flags
Is ‘anti-Canadianism’ the new ‘anti-Americanism?’
  Posted 17 days ago with 8 member flags
Clarification on the definition of "natural born citizen"
  Posted 15 days ago with 7 member flags