Originally posted by sirnex
In which there is no actual evidence *for* a quantum mind at all.
And you know because you've read the book too?
A quantum system would decohere to quick to be useful and there currently exists no mechanism showing how a non quantum system could protect
against that decoherence.
Once again, you are demonstrating your lack of understanding and misconceptions. Quantum effects are
known to be able to have a direct effect
upon biasing the tiny environmental signals coming into individual neurons, that "bias" them, if you are familiar with the term from electrical
engineering. Neurons
are biased by environmental EM fields in how they determine which neuron serves as the momentary path-of-least-resistance
to the next neuron in the chain, and this is well-known and well-studied. What
isn't as well-known and well-studied are the how's and why's
these tiny EM fields fluctuate so much, but it's known that self-reference or
recursion is actually happening within each neuron, as it links
back to itself a number of times, and this potentially infinite open-loop is always unpredictable and becomes susceptible to influence from the
surrounding EM field.
Ah, I'm trying to find someone who can explain it better than I can.
Here's a response to a question from physicsforums.com:
There are really two questions here.
1. Is the behavior of single neurons ever affected by quantum mechanics?
2. Is the behavior of a larger nervous system affected by quantum mechanics?
---
To the first question the answer is certainly yes. Membrane potential is constantly fluctuating due to random openings and closing of ion channels and
the like. Mini synaptic events also occur stochastically probably due to quantum fluctuations.
As for the second question. This seems to be untrue. It is likely that just as with any other macroscopic system the basic component parts may feel
quantum effects but the assembly as a whole behaves classically.
www.physicsforums.com...
Maybe that is a better explanation. There are multiple levels going on at the same time here. That much should be OBVIOUS, because your brain
definitely operates on the same quantum field that all other matter in the universe does! The question is whether your brain is sensitive to
information on that level, and the individual neurons certainly can be. So if individual neurons are altered in a sequence by quantum functions, then
just that possibility alone opens up huge potential.
Oh wow, you really like reading only what you want to see huh? The mechanism involved is unknown nor is anything actually moving faster than
the speed of light itself.
Wow. First you say what's going on is unknown, then you say nothing is moving faster than the speed of light. Yes, something is. Did you not see
the measurement of the lower bounds of this phenomena being
10,000 times the speed of light? Do you think they are measuring "nothing"?
Someone is reading only what they want to see, but it isn't me...
No information between the two entangled pairs moves between the two entangled pairs.
No
classical information, which comes with its own rules and definitions. Which I am not particularly interested in, no more than I am
Newtonian mechanics when it comes to quantum physics, which is modern.
Matter is energy. A very dense form of energy. Light is also a form of energy, though a photon must have hardly any mass to it
whatsoever.
Man, you almost got it... so damn close. keep trying kiddo.
Photon's mass is
assumed zero.
You have to understand what the technical stuff really means before you can see past it to the reality of the mystery they are attempting to label.
There is a difference between the word "light," and this stuff that is beaming into your eyeballs this very instant.
Dr. William Tiller
Psychoenergetic Science ... please, you also believe in a geocentric hollow flat Earth too?
lmao, not even in the same league. Did you miss "MIT," "tenured"? What do you think
other professionals think of the man? Why don't you
look that up, actually?
You are getting desperate now aren't you?
All you have to do is admit we may be onto something. And you might even tell us that you'll do some personal investigation into it yourself! Are
you too afraid to do that?