Originally posted by bommer09
Perhaps he is remarking on the fact that many of those who "hate" Obama are the very same people we would call fundamentalist Christians. The
article isn't really loading for me and I have no idea as to the true context.
However I don't really think he is equating Obama with God. However it is possible, a lot of kids are really dumb.
oh me. I don't know what to say. A lot of kids are really dumb? My boy is 7 years old, not far from this childs age, and I have to say, almost all
of what a kid knows at that age is a reflection of his/hers parents. To me, a "dumb" person is one who knows better, or has the resources to know
better, but just chooses not to. How can a child be "dumb" at that age? They haven't even had the time to be dumb yet, as I see it as a condition
that you nurture, not something you are born into.
Also, I know that the literal definition of dumb is much different that the way we are using it here, so there's no need to correct me on that, I'm
aware of the actual correct use for "dumb". I'm responding to the way it is used in this context.
It may seem silly to some of you me using this little disclaimer, but I have learned that with all the snobby people you can run into here, you must
not givehtem any way to derail the main idea by insulting your inteligence. I recently made a great (IMO) thread that got wonderful feedback, and
many compliments, but there are always a few. One wonderful ATS'er made a two line post (1 line longer thatn the norm for this behaviour actually)
putting my entire thread to waste because of my grammar! I am not any good at grammar, and this is the second or third time someone actually hinted
that the content of my thought was not as valid as their because of my sentence structure and spelling!
so, that's why the disclaimer, I wanted to make sure PenandSword couldn't come back with:
"that doesn't even have anything to do with the word dumb, so that is ignorant of you, which i believe is the word you were looking for."
or something similar.