If we were actually being *gasp*
reasonable here, wouldn't the actual arguement be based upon the
molecules of testosterone and
estrogen?...
both of which men
and women have different amounts of flowing through their bodies at any given point?
supply a man with enough estrogen and testosterone suppressant...
and you get a woman..
supply a woman with enough testosterone and estrogen suppressant... and you get a man..
so why not start yelling at a poster of the testosterone molecule for all the
male chouvanist patriarch rule?
I mean.. because at the end of the day.. all things considered..
THAT'S the root cause of the "blame" .. right?
all in all the whole feminist/masculist type talk is based on exactly that.. freacking molecules influencing the shape and behavior of our vehicles...
our bodies.
soop up a female with enough testosterone and you'll have her fellow women beginning to complain about her 'domineering' ways and any other thing
they don't like about how testosterone makes someone behave....
vice versa.
people can get caught up in this illusion of temporary form all they want .... but we're actually just the same body which has taken a certain form
because of specific hormones... that at any time could be changed for better or worse.
i think the whole arguement is a bunch of crap.
I dream of a global hermaphrodidic republic.
IN YOUR FACE, FEMINISTS AND MASCULISTS!
-