Originally posted by jerico65
Originally posted by fraterormus
Historically speaking, a Republican controlled Congress would be more likely than a Democratic controlled Congress to enact a Draft, and even then
most Republicans realize that doing such would amount to political suicide and would only do so as a last resort or in a case where it really was a
National Emergency and not a fabricated National Emergency we have in the War on Terror.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think it's been Democratic senators that have been the ones to talk about a draft in most recent years.
Solely Draft Issues like the Universal Military Training and Service Act that would require any U.S. Citizen between the ages of 18 and 34 to be
enlisted in the military have been introduced by Republicans in past years (Rep. Nick Smith R-MI, Rep. Roscoe Bartlett R-MD, Rep. Curtis Weldon
R-PA.)
However, if you are talking about the Universal National Service Act that would require any U.S. Citizen between the ages of 18 and 26 to perform a
15-month period of national service, either as a member of the armed forces or in a civilian capacity, that has been introduced 3 years in a row by
the same Democrat from NY (Rep. Charles Rangel D-NY).
Notice the distinction between a Draft and National Service. The Republican one is exclusively for Armed Services, while the Democrat one can be
served in either the Armed Services or in a Civil Service.
Still, the last time either was brought up for a vote, in the Democratically controlled Congress even the later only got 2 Votes for compared to 402
Votes against it.
[edit on 15-10-2009 by fraterormus]