Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty, Claims British Lord, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 28 times


reply posted on 15-10-2009 @ 02:33 PM by Remixtup
Treaties are potentially so threatening to the sovereignty of the individual States and the Union of These States that two thirds of the Senators are required to be convinced that the treaty under consideration does not contravene the U.S. Constitution and/or adversely impact on the retained functions and interests of the States before they consent/ratify.

In 1789, the States directly ratified the Constitution --- as per Article VII. Since then, the States through their representatives (their Senators) must also ratify any treaty --- Article II, Section 2, paragraph 2 --- for the same reason, namely, that the creators (the States) must have the final say.

There is a pecking order: God made People, People made States, States made the Union. Therefore, the Union is beholden to the States, the States are beholden to the People, and all three are beholden to God.

Further, Article VI, paragraph 2 quoted above commands that if and when all of the above requirements for a treaty are met --- that is, a) it does not contradict the Constitution; b) it is negotiated by the President who has sworn to not violate, and who in fact is not violating the Constitution; and c) it is ratified by two thirds of the State-defending-Senators who have sworn to not violate, and who do not by their vote violate the Constitution --- then, and only then, may the treaty in question go into full force and effect for the Union and for all of the individual States in the Union. This latter consequence is the reason for Article VI, paragraph 2 to conclude:

"...and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the [not "this"] Constitution [ of any State] or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. [Emphasis added.]"

So, the Judges in each State must obey a bona fide treaty, even if the treaty is contrary to that state's Constitution or contrary to any law of that state.


reply posted on 15-10-2009 @ 03:55 PM by DaMod



reply posted on 15-10-2009 @ 05:49 PM by DaMod
reply to post by I_am_Spartacus



That's what happens when things start to click perfectly into place. There are a lot of things clicking into place these days.


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 01:21 PM by Stormdancer777
reply to post by I_am_Spartacus




All these topics need to be somehow merged into a more cohesive picture, changes are happening quickly.


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 02:07 PM by Ulala
reply to post by Stormdancer777



I like to think I'm educated, but I read the first couple of posts last night and didn't understand where the loss of sovereignty comes in. The transfer of funds from rich to poor nations I understand, to help them prevent adding to the global warming we (allegedly) caused, affords them funding to go straight from little or no electricity generation to windfarms, solar generation and such like rather than coal, oil etc. Surely any incoming Republican administration can repeal this (voluntary) treaty ??

With respect to Christopher Monckton, he's not particularly well known over here in UK. Kudos to him for his work debunking global warming. But I don't understand the sovereignty thing, apols. Can someone better explain it ?


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 03:18 PM by Stormdancer777
reply to post by marg6043





the health care bill is nothing compare to what we are going to be heading with the CRAP and trade bill if passed.

I feel sick.


reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 05:45 PM by Heronumber0
reply to post by I_am_Spartacus



Before I believe something published on a blog, I need secondary proof please. If true, this news is dynamite, but then, I could have written the 'speech' myself and attributed it to someone else. More proof please.


reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 07:31 PM by ascisco
reply to post by Heronumber0



United Nations Climate Change Conference Copenhagen 2009

Official website.
en.cop15.dk...

Do a little bit of scanning, read the rhetoric all over the site. They are saying if nothing is done during this conference all is lost humanity is doomed!

Id say this is plenty of evidence to start a mass dissemination of knowledge on this disgusting treaty they will be trying to force on us.

Oh yea and here is a link to the actual treaty.

unfccc.int...

This thread needs more attention now!


[edit on 17-10-2009 by ascisco]


reply posted on 17-10-2009 @ 10:17 PM by orionthehunter
I'm surprised there are only one page of posts on this topic. I read here
fightinwordsusa.wordpress.com...
that Obama was likely going to sign a treaty that would end up transferring our wealth to third world countries and create a new world government. I wouldn't be surprised if cap and trade was the method. For the average American, this would result in electricity bills possibly increasing over 100 dollars a month and gas prices and anything that uses energy doubling or tripling or worse in my opinion. If you wanted to start a civil war, this would definitely get people fired up after they find out what our leaders have been up to.

[edit on 17-10-2009 by orionthehunter]
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Startling revelations from a Swiss banking insider
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
Rothschild Speaks: Want\'s One World Currency
  Posted 8 days ago with 21 member flags
ACTA and You - Important Video - It has Begun
  Posted 12 days ago with 15 member flags
Know Thine Enemy! Iran Warns of Coming Great Event.
  Posted 7 days ago with 12 member flags
MSM Try To Debunk Illuminati Denver Airport Underground Facility
  Posted 17 days ago with 10 member flags
They\'re Back!! Soros: Occupy To Turn Violent
  Posted 18 days ago with 8 member flags